Evanios vs OpenText Operations Bridge comparison

Evanios and OpenText are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Evanios is ranked #18, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Evanios holds a 0.5% mindshare in EM, compared to OpenText’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Evanios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Evanios

Read 6 Evanios reviews

42 Views
26 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Operations Bridge

Read 47 OpenText Operations Bridge reviews

770 Views
383 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Evanios

OpenText Operations Bridge

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

OpenText Operations Bridge and Evanios are competing products in the IT operations management space. OpenText Operations Bridge has the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, while Evanios is recognized for its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: OpenText Operations Bridge offers comprehensive monitoring, automation capabilities, and infrastructure health assessments. Evanios excels with seamless integration across platforms, straightforward interface design, and strong alert processing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Operations Bridge could improve with simplified deployment, enhanced user interface, and reduced complexity in setup. Evanios may benefit from enhanced automation features, wider support for third-party applications, and extended scalability for larger environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Bridge requires detailed deployment for complex environments, necessitating expertise and time. Evanios is favored for its rapid implementation and minimal learning curve. OpenText is lauded for comprehensive support, whereas Evanios is noted for responsive and hands-on service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Bridge involves higher initial costs but offers potential for substantial ROI through downtime reduction and resource efficiency. Evanios presents a cost-effective setup, allowing for quicker ROI, but long-term benefits depend on the extent of utilization.

To learn more, read our detailed Evanios vs. OpenText Operations Bridge Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. OpenText Operations Bridge

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Evanios

Ranking in Event Monitoring

18th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

17th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (67th)

OpenText Operations Bridge

Ranking in Event Monitoring

8th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Operations Bridge is 6.1%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user592602

Works at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for.

As with any new software implementation, during the integration we found a couple of minor issues when integrating certain products (such as SCOM). However, each time this happened Evanios was very quick to identify the bug we were seeing, patch it and provide the new update set for us to install. Also, during the evaluation of Evanios we found that they already had integrations with most of our larger monitoring tools, however they also stated that they would be able to create update sets to integrate certain products we used that they did not currently support. This proved to be very valuable for us because they were able to become an even better fit for our organization by creating update sets\integrations for PRTG, Quest Foglight, TIBCO and Thousand Eyes as well.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility

The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."

"Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with everything."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."

"I've found the solution to be very scalable."

"The preloaded rules and ways to monitor your systems are a must."

"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."

"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"It is stable."

"The most valuable aspect of Operations Bridge for us is its integration capabilities."

More OpenText Operations Bridge pros

Cons

"The price could be cheaper."

"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."

"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."

"Reporting has to be tackled a bit more. Conceptually, it is there and conceptually it is amazing, but somehow the module itself is suffering."

"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."

"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."

"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."

"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."

"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."

"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."

"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."

More OpenText Operations Bridge cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is competitive."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"The cost is very high."

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

It is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

Pricing for OpenText is considered very high compared to competitors. The licensing model is complicated, with separate licenses for different components like OBM and Smile, making it difficult to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

We need improvements in delivering quality reports from OBM and in integrating Operations Bridge with other components like UCMDB for asset discovery. Operations Bridge also lacks in the preparatio...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpsRamp vs OpenText Operations Bridge

Compared 43% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText Operations Bridge

Compared 32% of the time

BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText Operations Bridge

Compared 25% of the time

More OpenText Operations Bridge Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Evanios

February 2025

Download Evanios product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Bridge

February 2025

Download OpenText Operations Bridge product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

Overview

A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

Reduce the noise

Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

Evanios

OpenText Operations Bridge – SaaS is enterprise event and performance management software. With automated discovery, monitoring, and remediation, it fast-tracks your move to full-stack AIOps across multicloud and on- premises environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. OpenText Operations Bridge

February 2025

Free Report: Evanios vs. OpenText Operations Bridge

Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. OpenText Operations Bridge and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Evanios vs. OpenText Operations Bridge report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors and best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.