ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) comparison

ExtraHop Networks and IBM are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #73, while IBM is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.5. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of IBM users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

1,820 Views
1,329 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Read 54 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews

5,066 Views
2,533 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) are competing products in the network performance monitoring category. ExtraHop Reveal(x) holds an advantage in pricing and support, while IBM SevOne NPM provides more comprehensive features justifying its cost.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers real-time network monitoring, anomaly detection, and automated threat response. IBM SevOne NPM stands out with complex network environment compatibility, robust performance monitoring, and scalability.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) could benefit from enhanced customization options, improved integration capabilities, and more advanced reporting tools. IBM SevOne NPM needs a simplified configuration process, better user interface design, and reduced initial deployment complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) is known for its easy deployment and responsive customer support, suitable for various IT teams. IBM SevOne NPM, although requiring more initial setup, benefits from a strong support network that aids in handling complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) is seen as cost-effective with favorable ROI, reducing operational costs through efficient network management. IBM SevOne NPM may have higher initial costs but tends to deliver significant ROI by enhancing performance and efficiency in complex environments.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,012 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (11th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (18th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (41st), Log Management (43rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)	1.0%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.6%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

reviewer1543041

Network monitoring engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides consistent infrastructure monitoring with excellent usability and support

The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastructure's availability and ensure that alerts are generated when needed The most valuable features of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) are its stability,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"Wire data analytics."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"The out of the box reports and workflows are pretty good and they meet our requirements well."

"The comprehensiveness of this solution's collection of network performance and flow data is one of the basics in the field for what it does. It meets all of our needs. So for all those areas, for the most straightforward collection capabilities, right up to NetFlow and even telemetry, it meets all those demands. Not only just basic or fundamental SNMP collection capability, but the product also supports what we need for the future with telemetry streaming. So it's very comprehensive."

"One of the solution's biggest strengths is its capacity management performance, with out-of-the-box reports through NMS, as well as its ability to collect NetFlow-related data from devices. The collection of network performance and flow data is important because we have many critical business applications."

"The SMP and the xStats, which is for flat file integration, are both useful for integrating the various metrics that the device provides to monitor the performance of those systems."

"It's given us the ability to create various real-time network performance reports and distribute them to any colleague who can access these reports immediately."

"We have benefited mainly from the use of the dashboard interface. It makes the network visually interesting for other people who are not in the network. A lot of people are not network techies who understand streams in the network. Based on location, we have streams coming in and out. They can see visually when there is some problem. They don't need to understand all the network technology behind it to be able to understand if everything is working well or if there is a problem."

"We find that the reporting is particularly valuable in terms of not only communicating with our peer teams but also with the executives."

"I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or in-house. We don’t have to carry the data all over the globe. Also, I am impressed with the tool's flow reporting and Wi-Fi."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros

Cons

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"I would like to see live maps as an added feature. Also, build modules on AI and EML to provide better data insights that would proactively tell us what we should be looking after."

"The one area with room for improvement is probably administration. They added data insights to make a better user experience, but I'd like to see some improvements in the way the system's administered."

"There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities."

"The reporting of NMS is good, but it could be better."

"Some similar solutions offer end-to-end visibility."

"High-frequency polling is data-intensive because you're pulling more. If SevOne could figure out a way to manage the impact of high-frequency polling on the system, that would be very popular."

"There are a lot of pain points. My main problem is that we don't have a high availability system. There are 20 peers. We're going to lose the end-of-life appliances that are old. If we lose a peer and it doesn't come back, we lose all that data. The reason we don't have high availability is because it's double the charge."

"In terms of having a complete view of our network performance, I would rate it a nine out of 10. The reason for not giving it a 10 is that there is no packet capture associated with SevOne, but we do have other tools in place to do that."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"For the value that you get from SevOne, it's worth the price. There are a lot of cheaper alternatives on the market, and even free options. But they require more staff, more resources, and engineers with more advanced knowledge of monitoring. That's what makes SevOne worth the price."

"Choose a SevOne partner who can provide SevOne as a service and can deliver professional services and maintenance."

"There are different options available for licensing, with the per-device option being more expensive but more flexible."

"The pricing has been fair."

"There are cheaper solutions available."

"Many tools price things based on the number of KPIs that you're collecting around a device. In many cases, there could be hundreds of metrics that you need to collect. SevOne provides device-level pricing. That gives us the flexibility to turn on, and expand on, the metrics that we're collecting around those devices, without taking a financial hit."

"The pricing has not evolved with the market, which is one of the reasons we are moving to a new product."

"Have a bank of licenses, because it is about the number of objects (RAM, ports, CPU, etc.)."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?

There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities. It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improv...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SevOne Network Data Platform?

The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) ( /products/ibm-sevone-network-performance-management-npm-reviews ) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastru...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SevOne Network Data Platform?

To compete with custom-built tools, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) should accommodate the desired features and be timely in the delivery of feature updates. I would rate the overal...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 11% of the time

LiveNX vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 3% of the time

Avada Software Infrared360 vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

March 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

February 2026

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report

Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report

Also Known As

No data available

SevOne

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...

IBM

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

March 2026

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.