Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Qualys VMDR comparison

Fortra and Qualys are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Fortra is ranked #55, while Qualys is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Fortra holds a 0.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Qualys’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Read 6 Fortra Tripwire IP360 reviews

957 Views
775 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Qualys VMDR

Read 96 Qualys VMDR reviews

12,908 Views
8,648 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Qualys VMDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Qualys VMDR and Fortra Tripwire IP360 compete in vulnerability management and threat detection. With better pricing and support, Qualys VMDR has the edge, though Tripwire IP360 offers robust threat analysis.

Features: Qualys VMDR focuses on threat prioritization, continuous monitoring, and real-time insights. Fortra Tripwire IP360 stands out with its superior asset discovery, precision in vulnerability scanning, and environmental mapping capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Qualys VMDR could enhance its integration capabilities, reporting features, and user interface options. Fortra Tripwire IP360 may improve by simplifying its deployment process, expanding support channels, and reducing its infrastructure complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualys VMDR is praised for its straightforward cloud-based deployment and accessible customer service. In contrast, Fortra Tripwire IP360 relies on more complex infrastructure, potentially extending deployment time, yet it offers solid customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Qualys VMDR provides competitive pricing with a promising ROI due to efficient resource allocation and low maintenance costs. Fortra Tripwire IP360, while having higher initial setup costs, promises high long-term ROI through its advanced threat detection features.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Qualys VMDR Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Qualys VMDR

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

55th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualys VMDR

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (3rd), Configuration Management Databases (3rd), Container Security (9th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Fortra Tripwire IP360 is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys VMDR is 4.9%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys VMDR	4.9%
Fortra Tripwire IP360	0.6%
Other	94.5%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Corey Cole

Service Coordinator - Technology Security at a government with 10,001+ employees

The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain

Only the administrator was using the product. He used it to read reports as part of our compliance programs. It wasn't heavily used by a lot of users. The tool comes in at a large scale, and we tried to scale it down. The scaling did not apply to us. It was neither difficult nor easy. I rate the scalability a five out of ten. We had some challenges while scaling it down. It could do 10,000 devices, and we wanted to use it for ten devices. The process was difficult and expensive. We did not need the product anymore.

Read full review

Vaibhav Ghule

Soc Lead & Edr Administration at Persistent Systems

Continuous risk-based monitoring has strengthened incident response and vulnerability prioritization

I haven't explored Qualys VMDR's vulnerability lifecycle automation yet. One of my analysts mentioned that queries lack grouping operators in Qualys VMDR. From my experience, I would appreciate improvements in the query options in Qualys VMDR, specifically in the query-building process where I would need more features and operators. Additionally, we have been facing issues with Qualys on the cloud level. We cannot download the configuration profile from the cloud agent, and it is showing a pending action for download. During 2025, we noticed outages of Qualys a couple of times. I want to mention that there is an issue with receiving timely RCA deliveries. While this is not necessarily about the tool, it relates to support. The support has not been very responsive, and we are receiving RCAs a little delayed whenever we raise support cases or communicate with the TAMs. Additionally, the UI has a slight latency, which I and my team have experienced. They have also reported this latency issue when navigating through different pages.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."

"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."

"This solution gives us insight into our environment and improves our security. It helps us to maintain a good patching system whereby we know that XYZ is vulnerable within the system."

"We also like the flexibility in their licensing."

"I find Qualys VM very robust, and it's very useful for vulnerability management and patch management. The value that it brings to my environment is economies of scale. There is no limitation on adding any endpoints. You go by the rule, and it's added once another endpoint is added to our environment. It's automatically installed, and it's less work from our end. It frees up my license automatically if I don't need an endpoint or if my machine is decommissioned. I like the dashboard displays because I don't see any duplication. The most important part is vulnerability management and prioritization. Unlike Symantec, it shows the kind of vulnerability I would want to patch first. It provides a holistic view of the kind of vulnerabilities and the ones I should remediate first. I don't have to do a scan; it just brings up those critical kinds of vulnerabilities like zero-day vulnerabilities and tells me to prioritize them. You have to prioritize these vulnerabilities first and go on with the rest. The dashboard shows me the ones that have been fixed, so I don't have to complete an aging report. The user experience and the graphical interface are good. As it's user-friendly and understandable on an executive level, it brings real value. We also use this solution because it's robust and flexibile."

"Qualys VMDR provides us with a quick response to threat findings through regular scheduled scanning, which improves our security operations."

"The most valuable features of Qualys VMDR include patch management and the use of virtual scanners to scan appliances and devices, especially those provided by vendors where we cannot manage them ourselves."

"Qualys VMDR provides a real-time response and reporting feature, which is excellent."

"Detects new hosts along with vulnerabilities."

"It allowed us to divide tasks easily among teammates, significantly improving efficiency."

More Qualys VMDR pros

Cons

"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."

"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."

"Qualys VM should improve its methodology."

"If anything, I would like to see the user interface modernized a bit more."

"Could use additional security for the app."

"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."

"I do not like that all of the data is stored on the cloud."

"The response time of technical support takes a while."

"Support could be improved since the response can be slow."

More Qualys VMDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the price compares well within the market."

"The product was expensive for us."

"The solution is costly."

"The license is on a yearly basis."

"There are no additional fees in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"We have an annual contract for Qualys VMDR. I believe it's for either two years or five years."

"Qualys VM is better suited for medium to large companies because the price can be too much for smaller customers."

"The pricing and licensing for Qualys could be improved."

"Qualys Virtual Scanner Appliance isn't expensive right now. But the price for their product bundles could be better."

"We do see over $100,000 in terms of price, for mid-size programs. You likely will pay more than $100,000 without any discount. It is a bit pricey."

More Qualys VMDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Retailer

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	70

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Qualys VMDR?

I like that we have many scanners and channels that don't overload. It helps us scan and track easily. Also, the tagging system is good for tagging. We can still use QualysAgent task ID tools even ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys VMDR?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that we can consider both time and money saved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys VMDR?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 25% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 20% of the time

BMC Helix Automation Console vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 11% of the time

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualys VMDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360

March 2026

Download Fortra Tripwire IP360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys VMDR

February 2026

Download Qualys VMDR product report

Also Known As

IP360

Qualys VM, QualysGuard VM, Qualys Asset Inventory, Qualys Container Security

Overview

Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks.

Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

Fortra

Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response (VMDR) is a cornerstone product of the Qualys TruRisk Platform and a global leader in the enterprise-grade vulnerability management (VM) vendor space. With VMDR, enterprises are empowered with visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure - making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure their actual risk exposure over time.

Qualys VMDR offers an all-inclusive risk-based vulnerability management solution to prioritize vulnerabilities and assets based on risk and business criticality. VMDR seamlessly integrates with configuration management databases (CMDB), Qualys Patch Management, Custom Assessment and Remediation (CAR), Qualys TotalCloud and other Qualys and non-Qualys solutions to facilitate vulnerability detection and remediation across the entire enterprise.

With VMDR, users are empowered with actionable risk insights that translate vulnerabilities and exploits into optimized remediation actions based on business impact. Qualys customers can now aggregate and orchestrate data from the Qualys Threat Library, 25+ threat intelligence feeds, and third-party security and IT solutions, empowering organizations to measure, communicate, and eliminate risk across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments.

Qualys

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM

Agrokor Group, American Specialty Health, American State Bank, Arval, Life:), Axway, Bank of the West, Blueport Commerce, BSkyB, Brinks, CaixaBank, Cartagena, Catholic Health System, CEC Bank, Cegedim, CIGNA, Clickability, Colby-Sawyer College, Commercial Bank of Dubai, University of Utah, eBay Inc., ING Singapore, National Theatre, OTP Bank, Sodexo, WebEx

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Qualys VMDR

March 2026

Free Report: Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Qualys VMDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Qualys VMDR and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Qualys VMDR report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.