Frontegg vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Frontegg and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Frontegg is ranked #30, while Ping Identity is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Frontegg holds a 0.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Ping Identity’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

207 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 28 Ping Identity Platform reviews

2,477 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Frontegg both cater to organizations seeking robust identity management solutions. Frontegg seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly integration and advanced security functionalities.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers a comprehensive range of identity management and access control features, supporting multifactor authentication, single sign-on, and advanced access policies. Frontegg provides user-friendly integration, advanced security functionalities, and innovative features like self-service portals and role-based access management.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could enhance performance, simplify configuration processes, and improve scalability. Frontegg users recommend better documentation, more intuitive setup guides, and enhanced customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform’s deployment requires thorough configuration but offers solid customer service. Frontegg allows straightforward deployment and quick setup with decent customer service, making it easier for users to get started.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform has higher initial setup costs but delivers solid ROI due to extensive capabilities. Frontegg’s competitive pricing and rapid time-to-value make it cost-effective, particularly for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

30th

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

9th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

4th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

6th

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (4th), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 3.5%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395

Developer at Kovrr

Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support

Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.

Read full review

Dilip Reddy

Ping Engineer at Equitable

Easy to use but requires improvements in the area of stability

In my company, we have worked on authorization, and I know that there are different types of grants. We have worked on the authorization code, client credentials, and ROPC grant. There are two types of tokens, like the JWT token and internally managed reference tokens. JWT tokens are useful for finding information related to the claim requests. Internally managed reference tokens are useful for dealing with visual data and information. For the clients to fit the user information, they need to do additional work to fit all the user info into the site, which is to define and validate the token issue and provide the request for VPNs. I worked on the key differences between the authorization code and implicit grant. In the authorization code type, you will have the authorization code issued initially to the client, and the client has to exchange it with the authorization server, like using a DAC channel to get the access token. In implicit grants, tokens are issued right away if the application is a single-page application. We can either use the authorization code or an implicit grant.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

"People use the solution to secure their applications and authenticate particular processes."

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The product is costly."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 64% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 10% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors, best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, and best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.