Genesys PureConnect [EOL] vs NICE CXone comparison

Genesys and NICE are both solutions in the Workforce Engagement Management category. Additionally, 100% of Genesys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of NICE users who would recommend it.

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Read 1 Genesys PureConnect [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

NICE CXone

Read 16 NICE CXone reviews

2,769 Views
886 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

NICE CXone

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 24, 2025

NICE CXone and Genesys PureConnect [EOL] compete in the contact center solutions market. NICE CXone is preferred for its superior functionality and user-friendly design, while Genesys PureConnect [EOL] offers a robust feature set.

Features: NICE CXone provides a cloud-native architecture, AI-driven analytics, and omnichannel capabilities, enhancing agent efficiency and customer engagement. Genesys PureConnect [EOL] is recognized for its powerful routing and wide integration support, although its end-of-life status is a concern for future-proofing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NICE CXone offers rapid deployment and scalability through its cloud-based model, coupled with 24/7 customer support ensuring seamless integration. In contrast, Genesys PureConnect [EOL] requires substantial technical expertise for its traditional on-premises deployment, which may lead to delays.

Pricing and ROI: NICE CXone uses a subscription-based pricing model that fits diverse businesses, typically resulting in a quicker ROI due to lower upfront costs and operational efficiency. Genesys PureConnect [EOL] generally demands higher initial investment for on-premises setup, impacting short-term ROI, making NICE CXone's affordable pricing and cost efficiency appealing to organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Workforce Engagement Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,282 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NICE CXone

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workforce Engagement Management (3rd), IVR Systems (1st), Live Chat (1st), Knowledge Management Software (6th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (4th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (9th)

Featured Reviews

Mohamed-Saber

Sr. Genesys System Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides great functionality

There are many use cases for Genesys, as it has almost all the channels needed to have a better customer experience which will increase customer satisfaction A most valuable feature is that it can be customized to meet all customer needs. As of now, they are doing great in all areas and they…

Read full review

Argha Ghosh

Technology Specialist at Cognizant

Improved efficiency with browser-based call handling and efficient scripting tools

The audio quality in NICE CXone has room for improvement, as I experience issues like diffused calls and crackling audio. Clearing cache and cookies from browsers often resolves these problems, but it's something that occurs frequently. Simplifying the studio tool could also be an improvement, along with organizing external training and better communication about new features, like agent assist or agent co-pilot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Can integrate with a lot of gateways in voice."

"inContact has helped our organization greatly by allowing us to see at a glance which agents are available to receive calls and those who are not, we are able to see why not."

"The system is very flexible and powerful, especially for organizations wanting to control their environment."

"Being able to listen in on a call, which is exceptionally good with training."

"It is easy to look up and playback calls with this system as it categorizes the different types of calls that come through my call center. I like that inContact is always updating and continues to improve. The quality of its recorded calls is among the best that I have had experience with."

"We are able to see the calls in queue and able to see if someone is available or not."

"I assess the impact of the omnichannel capabilities on customer journey consistency as excellent, as it is a single pane of glass solution where all channels and omnichannel features are available, which is very supportive and increases customer productivity overall."

"It's easier as a supervisor to do your job more efficiently. You can have multiple things open at once to watch everything, being able to take one look at a page and see everything you need rather then having to flip through multiple programs. This is such a time saver. I get a lot more done in my day due to being able to keep my opened programs down to a minimum."

"I have found the ease of use of the ACD to be most valuable along with the inView dashboard."

More NICE CXone pros

Cons

"Customer support can sometimes be delayed."

"One of the biggest missing pieces is a link checker."

"I have noticed that occasionally the dashboard will freeze and some things may get stuck for a while. For example, if I have a dashboard open that shows how many calls are in queue and how many are currently being handled by agents, sometimes a call that an agent is handling will get stuck on the dashboard after the agent ends the call and the dashboard will show that the call is still a live call. Our tech team has explained this to us as a ghost call. After some time (or maybe many screen refreshes) the call will go away like it has just ended."

"MindTouch would greatly benefit by providing a GitHub pull request functionality to foster draft mode and open contribution writing."

"If you have hundreds of books, the initial download is slow."

"It could improve the quality of calls."

"Compared to challengers such as Zoom, which seem more cost-effective, NICE CXone's suite of products is very modular, so as they provide new services, you have to add to your existing package and this balloons your costs since there's an additional license needed to use the new tools."

"It is a hassle, if you are busy and caught up with something, that it will log you out."

"There are times when the data does not load and you have to keep hitting refresh. More colors and different layouts should be included in the next release."

More NICE CXone cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We had a custom setup that cost us some money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workforce Engagement Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with NICE CXone?

NICE CXone is a good feature, but it is expensive and costlier than other products such as Genesis or other alternatives. When it comes to solutioning, there are too many SKUs, which are line items...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?

We use NICE CXone for inbound and outbound calling and other digital channels for contact center purposes across all verticals. We are a system integrator and telecom provider that bundles this pla...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?

My recommendation for other organizations considering NICE CXone is that it is a good solution. Currently, I am based in India, and NICE CXone does not have a node in India to meet India's regulato...

See all answers

Comparisons

Genesys Cloud CX vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 39% of the time

Kamailio SIP Server vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Five9 vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Jabber vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Calabrio ONE vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Genesys PureConnect [EOL] Competitors

Genesys Cloud CX vs NICE CXone

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon Connect vs NICE CXone

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Webex Contact Center vs NICE CXone

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Service Cloud vs NICE CXone

Compared 6% of the time

Zendesk vs NICE CXone

Compared 6% of the time

More NICE CXone Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

January 2026

Download Genesys PureConnect [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

NICE CXone

January 2026

Download NICE CXone product report

Also Known As

Interactive Intelligence Customer Interaction Center, CIC

NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy, Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy, goMoxie

Overview

Gives your contact center a standards-based, multichannel software platform to blend all media types with your business systems.

Genesys

NICE CXone offers comprehensive solutions for managing customer support across channels, ensuring consistent reporting with integrated dashboards and efficient call management. The platform supports scalability and integration, catering to organizations of all sizes with diverse communication needs.

NICE CXone enhances customer support by providing dynamic content structuring and robust HTML editing. With omnichannel integration, users experience consistent reporting across platforms. The intuitive dashboards allow customizable views, improving supervision and training efficiency. Call management benefits from efficient tagging and audio playback, while tools like inView aid real-time data monitoring and flexible system customization. Challenges include occasional system slowness, dashboard freezes, and the need for a more user-friendly interface. Reporting features could be simplified for easier custom report creation, and users suggest enhancing call quality. The implementation process might pose difficulties, with a demand for additional layout options and interface enhancements. Despite these issues, NICE CXone remains a favored choice for comprehensive customer support solutions.

What are the key features of NICE CXone?

Dynamic Content Structuring: Improves organization of customer data.
Omnichannel Integration: Provides consistent cross-platform reporting.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalized supervision views.
Efficient Call Management: Includes tagging and audio playback.
Real-Time Monitoring: Supported by tools like inView.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Scalability: Effective for organizations of all sizes.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like Microsoft Dynamics 365.
Supervision Efficiency: Enhances monitoring and task assignments.
Communication Improvement: Optimizes email and call handling.

NICE CXone is extensively utilized in industries focused on customer support and workforce management, especially within call centers. It optimizes quality management through call recordings and workforce efficiency by managing agent breaks and tasks. Its integration capability with Microsoft Dynamics 365 makes it a strategic tool for organizations aiming to streamline communication processes across multiple brands.

NICE

Sample Customers

Americas Credit Union, Nowa Era, ING Bank, SJ Traffic Control, Western & Southern Life, Thomas Cook Northern Europe, Raiffeisen Bank, T-Mobile Austria, BOS Bank, mBank, Lasik MD, Allianz, Memira, Goteborg Energi AB

MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Genesys, Five9, NICE and others in Workforce Engagement Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workforce Engagement Management vendors.

We monitor all Workforce Engagement Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.