Genesys PureConnect [EOL] vs NICE CXone comparison

Genesys and NICE are both solutions in the Workforce Engagement Management category. Additionally, 100% of Genesys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of NICE users who would recommend it.

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Read 1 Genesys PureConnect [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

NICE CXone

Read 15 NICE CXone reviews

2,341 Views
702 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

NICE CXone

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 24, 2025

NICE CXone and Genesys PureConnect [EOL] compete in the contact center solutions market. NICE CXone is preferred for its superior functionality and user-friendly design, while Genesys PureConnect [EOL] offers a robust feature set.

Features: NICE CXone provides a cloud-native architecture, AI-driven analytics, and omnichannel capabilities, enhancing agent efficiency and customer engagement. Genesys PureConnect [EOL] is recognized for its powerful routing and wide integration support, although its end-of-life status is a concern for future-proofing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NICE CXone offers rapid deployment and scalability through its cloud-based model, coupled with 24/7 customer support ensuring seamless integration. In contrast, Genesys PureConnect [EOL] requires substantial technical expertise for its traditional on-premises deployment, which may lead to delays.

Pricing and ROI: NICE CXone uses a subscription-based pricing model that fits diverse businesses, typically resulting in a quicker ROI due to lower upfront costs and operational efficiency. Genesys PureConnect [EOL] generally demands higher initial investment for on-premises setup, impacting short-term ROI, making NICE CXone's affordable pricing and cost efficiency appealing to organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Workforce Engagement Management Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NICE CXone

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workforce Engagement Management (3rd), IVR Systems (1st), Live Chat (2nd), Knowledge Management Software (6th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (4th)

Featured Reviews

Mohamed-Saber

Sr. Genesys System Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides great functionality

There are many use cases for Genesys, as it has almost all the channels needed to have a better customer experience which will increase customer satisfaction A most valuable feature is that it can be customized to meet all customer needs. As of now, they are doing great in all areas and they…

Read full review

Antoneil Phillips

Operations Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Real-time adjustments enhance call management, though pricing needs improvement

The reporting isn't bad, but there are opportunities for improvement; we get real-time dashboards for monitoring, though for performance management, we have to procure certain reports manually by pulling down raw data from the system, which could be better. Regarding the pricing, this would be an area of opportunity as well; this feedback is based on where we're positioned in the Caribbean. Compared to challengers such as Zoom, which seem more cost-effective, NICE CXone's suite of products is very modular, so as they provide new services, you have to add to your existing package and this balloons your costs since there's an additional license needed to use the new tools, leading to potentially higher out-of-pocket expenses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Can integrate with a lot of gateways in voice."

"I have found the ease of use of the ACD to be most valuable along with the inView dashboard."

"Some of the best features with NICE CXone are the real-time visibility that you have, which empowers you to make adjustments on the fly, such as turning on and off your queues and adjusting how we route calls to our agents."

"It is easy to look up and playback calls with this system as it categorizes the different types of calls that come through my call center. I like that inContact is always updating and continues to improve. The quality of its recorded calls is among the best that I have had experience with."

"Customer support is terrific. The team is personable, informed, and responsive."

"It has the ability to edit the HTML, as well as the WYSIWYG."

"The technical support for NICE CXone is outstanding."

"Being able to listen in on a call, which is exceptionally good with training."

"It's easier as a supervisor to do your job more efficiently. You can have multiple things open at once to watch everything, being able to take one look at a page and see everything you need rather then having to flip through multiple programs. This is such a time saver. I get a lot more done in my day due to being able to keep my opened programs down to a minimum."

More NICE CXone pros

Cons

"Customer support can sometimes be delayed."

"If you have hundreds of books, the initial download is slow."

"It could improve the quality of calls."

"Your docs go on their servers and getting them out is difficult, especially if you want to switch to another authoring format, e.g., Markdown. There are no converters and an automated extraction of the docs from the CMS is not available."

"Compared to challengers such as Zoom, which seem more cost-effective, NICE CXone's suite of products is very modular, so as they provide new services, you have to add to your existing package and this balloons your costs since there's an additional license needed to use the new tools."

"The audio quality in NICE CXone has room for improvement, as I experience issues like diffused calls and crackling audio."

"inContact should offer a way to send faxes."

"MindTouch would greatly benefit by providing a GitHub pull request functionality to foster draft mode and open contribution writing."

"It is a hassle, if you are busy and caught up with something, that it will log you out."

More NICE CXone cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We had a custom setup that cost us some money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workforce Engagement Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with NICE CXone?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?

We're working in the finance space, banking, and our customers that we support are primarily banks and remittance services. We are a contact center providing services to other businesses, primarily...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?

I really can't add any value about how it's influenced our customer journey just yet because we're just in the process of implementing that and have no data at this stage. Overall, NICE CXone is no...

See all answers

Comparisons

Genesys Cloud CX vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 45% of the time

Kamailio SIP Server vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Jabber vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Calabrio ONE vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Five9 vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Genesys PureConnect [EOL] Competitors

Genesys Cloud CX vs NICE CXone

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon Connect vs NICE CXone

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Webex Contact Center vs NICE CXone

Compared 10% of the time

Five9 vs NICE CXone

Compared 9% of the time

Zendesk vs NICE CXone

Compared 6% of the time

More NICE CXone Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

August 2025

Download Genesys PureConnect [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

NICE CXone

August 2025

Download NICE CXone product report

Also Known As

Interactive Intelligence Customer Interaction Center, CIC

NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy, Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy, goMoxie

Overview

Gives your contact center a standards-based, multichannel software platform to blend all media types with your business systems.

Genesys

NICE CXone offers comprehensive solutions for managing customer support across channels, ensuring consistent reporting with integrated dashboards and efficient call management. The platform supports scalability and integration, catering to organizations of all sizes with diverse communication needs.

NICE CXone enhances customer support by providing dynamic content structuring and robust HTML editing. With omnichannel integration, users experience consistent reporting across platforms. The intuitive dashboards allow customizable views, improving supervision and training efficiency. Call management benefits from efficient tagging and audio playback, while tools like inView aid real-time data monitoring and flexible system customization. Challenges include occasional system slowness, dashboard freezes, and the need for a more user-friendly interface. Reporting features could be simplified for easier custom report creation, and users suggest enhancing call quality. The implementation process might pose difficulties, with a demand for additional layout options and interface enhancements. Despite these issues, NICE CXone remains a favored choice for comprehensive customer support solutions.

What are the key features of NICE CXone?

Dynamic Content Structuring: Improves organization of customer data.
Omnichannel Integration: Provides consistent cross-platform reporting.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows personalized supervision views.
Efficient Call Management: Includes tagging and audio playback.
Real-Time Monitoring: Supported by tools like inView.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Scalability: Effective for organizations of all sizes.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like Microsoft Dynamics 365.
Supervision Efficiency: Enhances monitoring and task assignments.
Communication Improvement: Optimizes email and call handling.

NICE CXone is extensively utilized in industries focused on customer support and workforce management, especially within call centers. It optimizes quality management through call recordings and workforce efficiency by managing agent breaks and tasks. Its integration capability with Microsoft Dynamics 365 makes it a strategic tool for organizations aiming to streamline communication processes across multiple brands.

NICE

Sample Customers

Americas Credit Union, Nowa Era, ING Bank, SJ Traffic Control, Western & Southern Life, Thomas Cook Northern Europe, Raiffeisen Bank, T-Mobile Austria, BOS Bank, mBank, Lasik MD, Allianz, Memira, Goteborg Energi AB

MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Genesys, Five9, NICE and others in Workforce Engagement Management. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workforce Engagement Management vendors.

We monitor all Workforce Engagement Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.