Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Genesys PureConnect vs NICE CXone comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Genesys PureConnect
Ranking in Workforce Engagement Management
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Contact Center Infrastructure (5th), Unified Communications (7th), IP Telephony & Unified Communications (2nd)
NICE CXone
Ranking in Workforce Engagement Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
IVR Systems (2nd), Knowledge Management Software (6th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Workforce Engagement Management category, the mindshare of Genesys PureConnect is 12.5%, down from 17.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NICE CXone is 12.8%, up from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workforce Engagement Management
 

Featured Reviews

Mohamed-Saber - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides great functionality
There are many use cases for Genesys, as it has almost all the channels needed to have a better customer experience which will increase customer satisfaction A most valuable feature is that it can be customized to meet all customer needs.  As of now, they are doing great in all areas and they…
James Arvidson - PeerSpot reviewer
A software that enables centers to operate more efficiently, increase the quality of every customer interaction, create new pathways to profit, and ensure ongoing customer-centric business improvemen
One of the best aspects of CXone is its omnichannel experience. It treats all contacts, whether phone, chat, email, or SMS, through the same system, allowing for consistent reporting and a true omnichannel experience. The platform is very flexible. You can customize it to do almost anything as long as it's based on logic, which has been incredibly valuable. In terms of analytics, CXone offers consistent, accessible data across all channels. In the past, different systems like Avaya for phones or separate platforms for chat and email made it hard to compare performance across channels. With CXone, you get the same data points across all interactions, making decision-making much easier. It also allows for deeper reporting, like IVR reporting, where you can see what options people choose and create custom KPIs for better insight.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Can integrate with a lot of gateways in voice."
"Being able to listen in on a call, which is exceptionally good with training."
"inContact has helped our organization greatly by allowing us to see at a glance which agents are available to receive calls and those who are not, we are able to see why not."
"It has the ability to edit the HTML, as well as the WYSIWYG."
"Customer support is terrific. The team is personable, informed, and responsive."
"I have found the ease of use of the ACD to be most valuable along with the inView dashboard."
"It is easy to look up and playback calls with this system as it categorizes the different types of calls that come through my call center. I like that inContact is always updating and continues to improve. The quality of its recorded calls is among the best that I have had experience with."
"It's easier as a supervisor to do your job more efficiently. You can have multiple things open at once to watch everything, being able to take one look at a page and see everything you need rather then having to flip through multiple programs. This is such a time saver. I get a lot more done in my day due to being able to keep my opened programs down to a minimum."
"We are able to see the calls in queue and able to see if someone is available or not."
 

Cons

"Customer support can sometimes be delayed."
"It is a hassle, if you are busy and caught up with something, that it will log you out."
"Your docs go on their servers and getting them out is difficult, especially if you want to switch to another authoring format, e.g., Markdown. There are no converters and an automated extraction of the docs from the CMS is not available."
"If you have hundreds of books, the initial download is slow."
"MindTouch would greatly benefit by providing a GitHub pull request functionality to foster draft mode and open contribution writing."
"One of the biggest missing pieces is a link checker."
"There are times when the data does not load and you have to keep hitting refresh. More colors and different layouts should be included in the next release."
"It could improve the quality of calls."
"I would like to see inView be a built-in feature of CXone rather than a separate platform, but everything else is terrific."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We had a custom setup that cost us some money."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workforce Engagement Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Genesys PureConnect?
Can integrate with a lot of gateways in voice.
What needs improvement with Genesys PureConnect?
As of now, they are doing great in all areas and they keep improving their services
What is your primary use case for Genesys PureConnect?
There are many use cases for Genesys, as it has almost all the channels needed to have a better customer experience which will increase customer satisfaction.
What needs improvement with NICE CXone?
One area where CXone could improve is in creating a more streamlined, user-friendly interface. While the interfaces are good, they can get a bit dated over time, though NICE is usually good about u...
What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?
I chose NICE CXone because it had the best return on investment and could scale effectively. After setting it up, I was so impressed that I went to work for NICE for three years, implementing their...
What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
 

Also Known As

Interactive Intelligence Customer Interaction Center, CIC
NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy cc: Discover, cc: Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Americas Credit Union, Nowa Era, ING Bank, SJ Traffic Control, Western & Southern Life, Thomas Cook Northern Europe, Raiffeisen Bank, T-Mobile Austria, BOS Bank, mBank, Lasik MD, Allianz, Memira, Goteborg Energi AB
MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy
Find out what your peers are saying about Genesys, Five9, NICE and others in Workforce Engagement Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.