Genesys PureConnect [EOL] vs NICE CXone comparison

Genesys and NICE are both solutions in the Workforce Engagement Management category. Additionally, 100% of Genesys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of NICE users who would recommend it.

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Read 1 Genesys PureConnect [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

NICE CXone

Read 16 NICE CXone reviews

3,085 Views
956 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

NICE CXone

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 24, 2025

NICE CXone and Genesys PureConnect [EOL] compete in the contact center solutions market. NICE CXone is preferred for its superior functionality and user-friendly design, while Genesys PureConnect [EOL] offers a robust feature set.

Features: NICE CXone provides a cloud-native architecture, AI-driven analytics, and omnichannel capabilities, enhancing agent efficiency and customer engagement. Genesys PureConnect [EOL] is recognized for its powerful routing and wide integration support, although its end-of-life status is a concern for future-proofing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NICE CXone offers rapid deployment and scalability through its cloud-based model, coupled with 24/7 customer support ensuring seamless integration. In contrast, Genesys PureConnect [EOL] requires substantial technical expertise for its traditional on-premises deployment, which may lead to delays.

Pricing and ROI: NICE CXone uses a subscription-based pricing model that fits diverse businesses, typically resulting in a quicker ROI due to lower upfront costs and operational efficiency. Genesys PureConnect [EOL] generally demands higher initial investment for on-premises setup, impacting short-term ROI, making NICE CXone's affordable pricing and cost efficiency appealing to organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Workforce Engagement Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,886 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NICE CXone

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workforce Engagement Management (2nd), IVR Systems (1st), Live Chat (1st), Knowledge Management Software (6th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (4th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (5th)

Featured Reviews

Mohamed-Saber

Sr. Genesys System Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides great functionality

There are many use cases for Genesys, as it has almost all the channels needed to have a better customer experience which will increase customer satisfaction A most valuable feature is that it can be customized to meet all customer needs. As of now, they are doing great in all areas and they…

Read full review

Morvin Arun Pinto

Cx Product Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Omnichannel features have unified journeys and AI now speeds up responses for our agents

NICE CXone is a good feature, but it is expensive and costlier than other products such as Genesis or other alternatives. When it comes to solutioning, there are too many SKUs, which are line items or components that could have been bundled together. For example, CXone agent licenses do not include QM in the basic packages, whereas in the Genesis world it is bundled. The price comparison is higher compared to Genesis or other platforms. I have been using Genesis for three to four years across multiple customers, and now that NICE CXone has become available, I have started comparing all the features and benefits. I find there are some gaps, with more features available but at a higher cost for NICE. Regarding cost-effectiveness and return on investment of NICE CXone, the main challenge is working with the NICE team. The speed of onboarding is lengthy and people-dependent initially. When comparing with other OEMs and CCaaS products, the UI interface and partner portal have multiple access points. I need to log into different portals for NICE CXone, whereas my other competitor platforms offer single sign-on where I can log in once and access all partner-led programs and learning materials in one location. There is room for improvement in this area, though gradually NICE can change this approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Can integrate with a lot of gateways in voice."

"Customer support is terrific. The team is personable, informed, and responsive."

"It's easier as a supervisor to do your job more efficiently. You can have multiple things open at once to watch everything, being able to take one look at a page and see everything you need rather then having to flip through multiple programs. This is such a time saver. I get a lot more done in my day due to being able to keep my opened programs down to a minimum."

"Being able to listen in on a call, which is exceptionally good with training."

"The technical support for NICE CXone is outstanding."

"It is easy to look up and playback calls with this system as it categorizes the different types of calls that come through my call center. I like that inContact is always updating and continues to improve. The quality of its recorded calls is among the best that I have had experience with."

"Some of the best features with NICE CXone are the real-time visibility that you have, which empowers you to make adjustments on the fly, such as turning on and off your queues and adjusting how we route calls to our agents."

"It has the ability to edit the HTML, as well as the WYSIWYG."

"The system is very flexible and powerful, especially for organizations wanting to control their environment."

More NICE CXone pros

Cons

"Customer support can sometimes be delayed."

"I would like to see inView be a built-in feature of CXone rather than a separate platform, but everything else is terrific."

"It is a hassle, if you are busy and caught up with something, that it will log you out."

"It could improve the quality of calls."

"If you have hundreds of books, the initial download is slow."

"inContact should offer a way to send faxes."

"NICE CXone is a good feature, but it is expensive and costlier than other products such as Genesis or other alternatives."

"One of the biggest missing pieces is a link checker."

"The audio quality in NICE CXone has room for improvement, as I experience issues like diffused calls and crackling audio."

More NICE CXone cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We had a custom setup that cost us some money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workforce Engagement Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Insurance Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with NICE CXone?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?

We use NICE CXone for inbound and outbound calling and other digital channels for contact center purposes across all verticals. We are a system integrator and telecom provider that bundles this pla...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?

My recommendation for other organizations considering NICE CXone is that it is a good solution. Currently, I am based in India, and NICE CXone does not have a node in India to meet India's regulato...

See all answers

Comparisons

Genesys Cloud CX vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

Kamailio SIP Server vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Five9 vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Jabber vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Calabrio ONE vs Genesys PureConnect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Genesys PureConnect [EOL] Competitors

Genesys Cloud CX vs NICE CXone

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon Connect vs NICE CXone

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Webex Contact Center vs NICE CXone

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Service Cloud vs NICE CXone

Compared 6% of the time

Zendesk vs NICE CXone

Compared 6% of the time

More NICE CXone Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

February 2026

Download Genesys PureConnect [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

NICE CXone

February 2026

Download NICE CXone product report

Also Known As

Interactive Intelligence Customer Interaction Center, CIC

NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy, Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy, goMoxie

Overview

Gives your contact center a standards-based, multichannel software platform to blend all media types with your business systems.

Genesys

NICE CXone enhances customer service with AI-driven tools, omnichannel support, and dynamic help systems. Ideal for contact separation and centralized reporting, it simplifies call and email handling with real-time analytics and a flexible interface.

NICE CXone supports sophisticated customer interactions by offering features to improve call management and reporting. Integrating omnichannel experiences through consistent analytics, it provides efficient WebRTC functionality and customization. Real-time dashboards and AI tools improve operational efficiency. Yet, some areas like UI complexity and audio quality require attention, and pricing should be considered. It's keenly used for managing calls, emails, and workforce optimization.

What are the key features of NICE CXone?

Dynamic Help Systems - Simplifies content structuring and reorganization for ease of use
Omnichannel Support - Ensures seamless communication across channels with consistent reporting
Scripting Tool - Offers flexibility for customization to fit specific business environments
Real-time Dashboards - Enhances call management with instant insights and analytics
AI-driven Tools - Optimizes customer interactions through advanced technology applications
WebRTC Efficiency - Improves communication clarity and reliability in customer interactions

What benefits and ROI should reviews highlight?

Enhanced Call Tracking - User-friendly interface and call tagging improve monitoring and service efficiency
Advanced Analytics - Provides deep insights that help optimize customer service operations
Customization Flexibility - Adapts to varying business needs for better control and management
Efficiency in Workforce Management - Streamlines processes leading to more effective resource use
Custom Real-time Insights - Support decision-making with up-to-date data for strategic adjustments

In industries like tech, finance, and telecommunications, CXone is integral in managing high call volumes and optimizing workforce capabilities. Businesses utilize its voice routing, IVR, and omnichannel features extensively for effective customer support. Its implementation allows for seamless contact handling across multiple brands, enhancing customer experience while centralizing reporting and quality monitoring.

NICE

Sample Customers

Americas Credit Union, Nowa Era, ING Bank, SJ Traffic Control, Western & Southern Life, Thomas Cook Northern Europe, Raiffeisen Bank, T-Mobile Austria, BOS Bank, mBank, Lasik MD, Allianz, Memira, Goteborg Energi AB

MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy

Buyer's Guide

Workforce Engagement Management

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Genesys, NICE, Five9 and others in Workforce Engagement Management. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workforce Engagement Management vendors.

We monitor all Workforce Engagement Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.