Kiuwan and GitHub Code Scanning compete in the code analysis and security testing category. GitHub Code Scanning seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration with the GitHub ecosystem and advanced features that facilitate process automation and collaboration.
Features: Kiuwan provides detailed analysis, a broad range of metrics, and effective vulnerability identification. GitHub Code Scanning offers seamless GitHub integration, extensive process automation capabilities, and a wide array of advanced security features.
Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could improve its integration with various systems, enhance performance speed, and strengthen customer support. GitHub Code Scanning would benefit from better documentation, expanded language support, and additional user guidance to enhance overall usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is noted for a straightforward deployment process but needs better customer service. GitHub Code Scanning provides efficient integration with GitHub repositories and responsive user support, offering a smoother user experience overall.
Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan offers a favorable return on investment, although initial setup costs might be a concern. GitHub Code Scanning is positioned as cost-effective due to leveraging GitHub's existing infrastructure, delivering a strong ROI through easy integration and comprehensive features.
Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.