Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Google and Kaseya are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Google is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaseya is ranked #37 with an average rating of 6.3. Google holds a 1.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

1,243 Views
1,131 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

315 Views
185 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in monitoring and management solutions. Google Cloud's operations suite stands out for its comprehensive features, while Kaseya Traverse provides superior customer satisfaction in pricing and support.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers robust network performance monitoring, proactive issue resolution, and real-time analytics, making it effective in managing IT environments. Google Cloud's operations suite delivers comprehensive cloud monitoring, logging, and diagnostics, with the added advantage of seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, enabling extensive cloud-native operations.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse could enhance its cloud monitoring scope, improve multi-cloud integration, and offer more advanced analytics to augment its capabilities. Google Cloud's operations suite could lower its upfront costs, improve user interface simplicity for non-tech users, and enhance support response times for faster issue resolution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse facilitates deployment through an intuitive process and extensive support, ensuring efficient setup. Google Cloud's operations suite benefits from seamless integration within its ecosystem, accompanied by robust documentation and consistent support, promoting ease of use within cloud operations.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse presents a cost-effective profile with a quick ROI, well-regarded for its pricing structure. This approach aligns with customer satisfaction. On the other hand, Google Cloud's operations suite, despite higher upfront costs, is valuable for its advanced capabilities, beneficial for operations at scale, where ROI is realized through feature advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Kaseya Traverse

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (26th), Log Management (29th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

37th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (67th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.2%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"It's easy to use."

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"Google's technical support is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"The logging functionality could be better."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"It could be more stable."

"It could be even more automated."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost could be lower."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Stackdriver?

The Ops Agent and logging transport feature of the solution have had a major impact on improving application performance. The solution also allows the transport of logs into log buckets, which is h...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 22% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 53% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 24% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 22% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

April 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Kaseya Traverse

March 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.