Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Google and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Google is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #65. Google holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

2,456 Views
2,213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Diagnostics

Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews

434 Views
272 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

OpenText Diagnostics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Diagnostics and Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) are both prominent tools in the market. Google Cloud's operations suite seems superior due to its features, making users feel it is worth the price.

What features are offered by OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Diagnostics is praised for its diagnostic accuracy, detailed reporting, and cost-effectiveness. Google Cloud's operations suite is recognized for its integration capabilities, scalability, and comprehensive solution for larger environments.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

Users of OpenText Diagnostics mention the need for more cloud capabilities, enhanced integrations, and modern features. For Google Cloud's operations suite, users seek a simplified setup process, better real-time monitoring, and process simplicity.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Diagnostics users report an efficient deployment process but express concerns about the depth of customer service. Google Cloud's operations suite users note a steeper learning curve during deployment but commend the responsive and helpful customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

OpenText Diagnostics is commended for its cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI. Google Cloud's operations suite, while perceived as more expensive, is viewed as delivering better value for money due to advanced features and strong performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Diagnostics Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Diagnostics

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,476 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (29th), Cloud Monitoring Software (23rd)

OpenText Diagnostics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

65th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.1%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.

Read full review

Ravi Suvvari

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training

HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"Google's technical support is very good."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."

"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."

Cons

"The logging functionality could be better."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"It could be even more automated."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."

"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."

"The interface could be more user friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"The cost could be lower."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Stackdriver?

The Ops Agent and logging transport feature of the solution have had a major impact on improving application performance. The solution also allows the transport of logs into log buckets, which is h...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 21% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Prometheus Group vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 43% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 32% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 26% of the time

More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download OpenText Diagnostics product report

Also Known As

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics

Overview

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

BSkyB, Alior Bank

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Diagnostics

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Diagnostics

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Diagnostics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. OpenText Diagnostics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.