Google Firebase vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Google and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.9. Google holds a 6.3% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Google Firebase

Read 45 Google Firebase reviews

6,701 Views
4,427 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 40 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,637 Views
2,236 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Firebase

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Google Firebase and SAP S4HANA on AWS both compete in the realm of digital solutions, focusing on app development and enterprise resource planning, respectively. While Firebase offers a strong suite for app development, including real-time capabilities, S4HANA provides robust ERP functionalities, excelling in finance and manufacturing support.

Features: Google Firebase includes Real-time Database, Google Cloud Functions, and Crashlytics, enabling seamless app development and deployment without a significant backend setup. SAP S4HANA on AWS offers comprehensive ERP capabilities, exceptional database management, and integration with AWS, catering to extensive enterprise needs, especially in finance and manufacturing.

Room for Improvement: Google Firebase users seek better control over Cloud Functions, improved log management, and more flexible pricing models, along with enhancing technical support. SAP S4HANA on AWS can benefit from addressing the high cost of hardware and refining product compatibility with virtualization platforms. Improvements in the licensing process and documentation clarity are also suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Firebase generally features easy deployment on the public cloud with clear documentation, while community support is strong, although official support could be better. SAP S4HANA on AWS offers varied deployment options across public cloud, private cloud, and on-premises environments, but may require complex initial configurations. Nevertheless, AWS provides responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Google Firebase is praised for cost-effective pricing models, including a generous free tier, but the usage-based pricing can bring unexpected costs. SAP S4HANA on AWS is considered expensive due to licensing and maintenance costs; however, its comprehensive features justify the investment for large enterprises. While Firebase assures strong ROI with lower costs, S4HANA's ROI aligns with its extensive enterprise capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Firebase

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Firebase is 6.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.9%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Shravan Revanna

Vice President at E-Cell Ramaiah

Simple to get started with and offers integration features in multiple programming languages

The product provides integration features in multiple languages, such as Python, JavaScript, Golang, and all other languages. Google Firebase has documentation, which might seem a bit confusing, but one with decent knowledge can easily explore and get started with Firebase quickly. Before jumping into any cloud infrastructure, the tool should analyze how much it would cost to run the database. Google Firebase provides a certain number of reads and writes per day, which is approximately 40,000 reads and writes. If there are more than 200 to 300 active users per day, there will be plenty of reads and writes to the database. In such a case, one can't use Google Firebase and has to upgrade to Spark, which is where it is based on usage. The tool is fairly simple to get started with. Utilize all the features can get very complicated. One must be a pretty good developer who has a lot of experience to be able to utilize the best features. It gets really complicated over time. The basic functionality and basic usage are easy to use and easy to get started. There are plenty of deprecated versions, and frequently upgrading them causes inconvenience. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Bhavesh Shah

SAP Cloud Engineer SAP Commvault Backup Administrator- DC Migrations on AWS at CLARIANT SE

With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users

CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"The product’s most valuable features are integration and hosting."

"It has security rules to control database read/write operations in real-time."

"The most valuable feature of Google Firebase authentication and deployment."

"Allows us to create functions without any infrastructure apart from the Google App Engine."

"The platform is scalable."

"If you are selling an app with extensive Firebase use, costs may go up."

"The most beautiful feature of Google Firebase is that it gives you a lot of functionalities out of the box, without you having to develop or having to complete a solution. For example, identity management is integrated, and security is out of the box, particularly security for the user and the ability of each user to see his data. I also like that Google Firebase has a really good performance and is comparable to MongoDB. It's on the same level, and sometimes, it's on an even higher level than MongoDB. Other functions that Google Firebase has that I find valuable include information dissemination, mail automation, and SMS, available out of the box. Another valuable feature of the solution is that it allows you to develop some functionalities on the server side, so you can write JavaScript functions on the server side and use those functions quite easily. Google Firebase gives you almost a full backend environment out of the box without you having to do any deployments or a lot of administration because all administration is given out of the box."

More Google Firebase pros

"The most valuable features of SAP S/4HANA on AWS include its availability and performance."

"The solution adds great value to any organization."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."

"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS has high performance. All the data is in one place and it's real-time. When you make an entry you don't have to wait a couple of minutes, hours, or overnight as something the batch process takes time. It is instantaneous and is available to everybody."

"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."

"The tool covers many modules, like production, planning, management, and finance. It is a very scalable tool that can be beneficial for any company."

"They have their own instances where you can host your database."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"The notifications must be made a little bit better."

"I would prefer Google Firebase to focus more on its integration capabilities since it is an area in the solution with certain shortcomings."

"The platform's bandwidth is quite expensive. Its price could be better."

"You need to have some experience with deployment."

"There needs to be an easy way to duplicate a database."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"Google Firebase's app testing feature for Android, where you can upload your APK, needs improvement because it's not working very well."

"In terms of DevOps, such as CI/CD deployments and integrating webhooks with GitHub, GitLab, or other platforms, Firebase does not offer those capabilities at that level."

More Google Firebase cons

"Currently, AWS has data centers in only a limited number of regions compared to other cloud providers like Azure or Google Cloud."

"If you go to AWS's site they offer training programs that are very good. SAP does not do the same, if SAP could provide some training that would be great."

"The user-friendliness is questionable. The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training."

"The tool should undergo an overall improvement, including support. Data sharing should also be faster."

"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."

"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."

"The solution is costlier than other products."

"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Google Firebase is an expensive solution."

"The pricing component is a bit confusing when it comes to what exactly you'll pay for, but I wouldn't say it's expensive."

"My company makes monthly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no additional costs apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution."

"I rate the price of Google Firebase a four out of five."

"It is not easy to calculate the cost per copy, use or if the load rose dramatically we did not know how that would impact the final price."

"The price of Google Firebase is very good."

"Google Firebase’s pricing needs improvement."

"The pricing plans indicate it can get very expensive."

More Google Firebase pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the solution's pricing an eight."

"There are additional modules-wise, it's needed for modules, and also for any new functions."

"The licensing of the product is reasonable but the cost of the hardware is exorbitant."

"We pay a monthly fee for the use of SAP S4HANA on AWS for approximately five years. That's the time of the contract."

"It is a significant investment, around six hundred thousand dollars, and it involves both a one-time on-premises installation on servers and a cloud subscription with different flavors for SAP S4HANA."

"SAP S4HANA's pricing model should be more flexible and transparent - there's a lot of negotiation and internal factors, and some customers get better value and services for the same product."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS has reasonable pricing."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Firebase?

Google Analytics for Firebase is the best feature of the solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation. On a scale of one to ten for expense, SAP is a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

There are many things already there. There just needs to be a document approval workflow, which is not limited to procurement and other documents. There might be an additional document approval wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Google Firebase

Compared 57% of the time

DigitalOcean vs Google Firebase

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Firebase

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Firebase

Compared 8% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Firebase

Compared 7% of the time

More Google Firebase Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 70% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 9% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Firebase

April 2025

Download Google Firebase product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

March 2025

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Overview

Google Firebase is a stable, reliable, and scalable mobile platform that enables you to quickly develop apps, accelerate them, and monitor their performance.

With Google Firebase You Can

Build and run successful apps
Scale globally
Monitor app quality and performance with little effort
Boost user engagement

Google Firebase Features:

Crashlytic
Automatic updates
Fast and easy deployment
Access to Cloud Firestore
Multi-platform sign-in authentication
Flexible drop-in UI
Real-time database
Remote configuration
Firebase machine learning
Cloud messaging
Advanced message targeting
Push messages
Error monitoring

SDKs supported by Google Firebase:

Web SDK
iOS SDK
Android SDK
Admin SDK

Benefits of Google Firebase:

Fast implementation: Google Firebase makes it possible for you to set up your authentication system quickly, using minimal code.
Comprehensive security: With Google Firebase, your systems remain secured; It is backed by Google Sign-in, Chrome Password Manager, and also Smart Lock.
Machine learning capabilities: Firebase offers machine learning capabilities that help you deploy and train custom models.
Eliminate the need to manage servers: Because Google Firebase offers cloud functions, it enables you to run your mobile backend code without having to also manage your servers.
Authentication for any platform: Google’s Firebase authentication makes the sign-in process easier by providing an end-to-end identity solution that works with any platform.
Customized notifications: With cloud messaging, you can customize alerts, defining how and when they are sent, what sounds they should make, and can also select the expiration date for each message. In addition, it gives you the ability to track custom conversion events.
Fast and secure web hosting: Firebase makes it possible for you to have easy and secure web hosting with fast content delivery. Firebase hosting also provides free SSL certificates.
Cloud storage: With Google Firebase you have access to cloud storage that supports robust uploads and downloads, can handle user-generated content, and provides simple and intuitive access control.
Developer-friendly: Developers prefer to use Firebase because it lets them focus on creating frontend code for mobile applications rather than having to concentrate on backend code.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot user Nilakshi S., technical team lead at AuthentiCode says, “The solution is very stable and very reliable. There aren't any bugs or glitches.”

"What I like most about Google Firebase is that it's one of the easier options to host a website or app quickly," says Craig F., application development manager at a financial services firm.

A senior developer at a consultancy says, “The documentation for Google Firebase is great. Also, what I like about it is the integration to Android, which is the reason I went with Firebase.”

Google

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Fabulous, Pic Collage, Shazam, SkyScanner

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

April 2025

Free Report: Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Firebase vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.