

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
By migrating from AWS to Google Cloud Platform, we have saved a lot of time and money.
It eliminates the need for additional hardware, making it a financially and technically sound investment.
Reputation and data security are the two most important things to a financial institution.
We may have prevented a security breach with remediation of the findings.
They can respond with technical documentation or pass on the case to the next level because it requires the development of a new feature or changing a feature due to a bug.
Anywhere we raise a tech case, they revert back within an hour.
Support is not just good; it's excellent.
The autoscaling capabilities of Google Kubernetes Engine have significantly impacted our operations.
Scalability is a strong aspect; we have never experienced issues with it.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We haven't had any issues scaling the solution.
If I have 100 replicas of containers and the traffic suddenly pushes to 1,000 within a fraction of a second, the selected machine type must be fast.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
It provides excellent stability capabilities.
Most of the time, when the client requires data, it is not available.
When looking at the web interface, it feels kind of slow due to the many features involved.
Log observability could be made easier so someone from high school can use it without having technological expertise.
It would be helpful if I could easily find log information in a particular namespace without needing to write certain labels.
Prisma Cloud is an excellent tool.
We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts.
Even though documentation was available, it took a while for a new person to understand what integration meant, what will be achieved after the integration, or how the integration needed to be done on the Azure or AWS side.
Instead, we only pay for the hardware we use, which results in cost-cutting.
Google is considered cheaper compared to AWS, making it suitable for smaller to medium companies concerning cost.
The on-demand nodes are quite expensive.
The cost was not on the higher side.
If you are using a single tool like Prisma Cloud, with a single license, you can monitor all environments, such as Google Cloud, Azure, AWS, and Oracle Cloud.
Prisma Cloud isn't cheap.
The most valuable aspect of Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is its managed nature, which significantly reduces the burden on our platform team.
The best advantage of Google Kubernetes Engine is that it manages Kubernetes for you, making everything related to the master nodes managed for you with automatic updating and upgrading.
GKE is easier to understand and use than Elastic Kubernetes Service.
Prisma Cloud excels by offering a comprehensive solution within a single dashboard. This unified approach addresses all our requirements, making it the most advantageous aspect of this tool.
There is a wide range of integrations, and the compatibility with various cloud providers is very useful.
It provides a single pane of glass.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Kubernetes Engine | 2.3% |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform | 18.9% |
| Amazon EKS | 13.3% |
| Other | 65.5% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 12.8% |
| Wiz | 20.2% |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 9.8% |
| Other | 57.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.
Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.
What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?
What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?
Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.