GoToWebinar vs Webex comparison

GoTo and Cisco are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. GoTo is ranked #18, while Cisco is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. GoTo holds a 2.2% mindshare in VM, compared to Cisco’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

GoToWebinar

Read 8 GoToWebinar reviews

597 Views
597 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Webex

Read 128 Webex reviews

3,354 Views
3,253 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GoToWebinar

Webex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Webex and GoToWebinar are competing products in the virtual meetings and webinars category. Webex leads in pricing and customer service support, while GoToWebinar is favored for its comprehensive features.

Features: Webex integrates seamlessly with third-party apps, offers advanced security protocols, and provides customization capabilities, appealing to businesses with specific needs. GoToWebinar stands out for extensive webinar-specific tools like automated email reminders, detailed analytics, and custom branding options, better catering to large, structured virtual events.

Room for Improvement: Webex could enhance its webinar features and integration capabilities further to match GoToWebinar. It might also improve its advanced analytics and expand branding options. GoToWebinar could benefit from simplifying its integration with other apps, improving mobile experience, and enhancing affordability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Webex provides a simplified deployment process with comprehensive onboarding resources and 24/7 customer service. GoToWebinar, though slightly more complex to deploy, offers extensive documentation and strong support, typically available during business hours.

Pricing and ROI: Webex offers cost-effective plans favorable for organizations with budget constraints, ensuring high ROI through affordable pricing and robust support. GoToWebinar, despite higher pricing, compensates with specialized features that provide significant value, offering solid ROI for businesses requiring advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed GoToWebinar vs. Webex Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar vs. Webex

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoToWebinar

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Webex

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

128

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of GoToWebinar is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 6.5%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Webex	6.5%
GoToWebinar	2.2%
Other	91.3%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

RITA Conroy-Martin

Director of Marketing at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Video library is a great tool and it enables good customization; feels a little antiquated and rusty

I like that recordings are available immediately, it's a great feature. I also appreciate being able to use the video library as a tool, and the integration of an API with other systems we have. We were able to build our own customer portal and then integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface. People thought they were on our platform, but they were using GoToWebinar. Those are unique features that seemed to be very easy for our development team to integrate. I like that aspect of it. It also provides good visibility if somebody had seen a webinar that was useful. It's very easy to push them out. Registration is an easy process as is customization on the back end. We very rarely had technical issues running the webinars so it's a pretty robust platform overall.

Read full review

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Collaborating in hybrid incident calls has become faster while the meeting interface still needs fixes

The best features are the ability to schedule meetings and launch ad hoc meetings. Additionally, we can create breakout rooms within the meeting itself, which is another excellent feature. Whenever we have production issues, many teams join a single Webex call. Sometimes we need to group together as separate smaller groups and work in parallel to identify the production issues. In those cases, we create Webex breakout rooms and each member joins the corresponding breakout session to progress on their task. Webex helps significantly in the hybrid environment. When we are working from home, it is very easy for us to meet with other team members and the management to get in touch and progress. Webex improves communication because even if we are working from home, we can connect with people and talk to them on a video call. It has improved the incident resolution time by getting into a call in Webex rooms and remediating the issues together as soon as possible. Audio and video quality is excellent for Webex. It has saved considerable time in terms of incident remediation. Whenever we have issues, we jump on a call and work together in parallel. This approach saves time and improves efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were able to build our own customer portal and integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface."

"The interface is browser-based and simple, which is an advantage over other solutions."

"I can extract the activity and the attendance reports, along with every single question that was asked during the webinar, which is a feature that we highly value."

"This solution is very reliable. It is easy to switch between audio and microphone when using headphones."

"All of their features are good. They are more or less equivalent to the competition. There's less disturbance, less jitter, the voice is always good even at a low bandwidth."

"I like that it can accommodate larger groups of listeners. I think in my client's organization, they use Webex for meetings with a larger group of listeners. I believe Skype For Business is not preferred. I think they use Webex or their own custom platform because it accommodates more users in one meeting."

"The most noteworthy aspect of Webex is its quality, which I found satisfactory without any notable issues."

"Webex is easy to use, even for people who are just learning it."

"Webex has one-click calling, which makes things easier. You click, and it automatically dials in to the meetings without pressing additional buttons. It's easy for people who aren't on WebEx. That was helpful."

"Webex improves communication because even if we are working from home, we can connect with people and talk to them on a video call."

"The product is quite secure. Other products, such as Zoom, have had security issues raised in the media."

"The product improves team collaboration in our company since it integrates with Microsoft Teams or other vendors."

"Webex is a collaboration tool that helps you with remote support and collaboration."

More Webex pros

Cons

"The chat window and using polls is easier in Zoom than compared to GoToWebinar. Make it simpler and easier to publish polls on the fly would improve the solution."

"The sharing of cameras is limited to meeting organizers."

"GoToWebinar would be improved with the inclusion of support for video endpoints."

"The platform feels old and a little rusty, more could be invested into the look and feel of it."

"Some of my friends also use GoToWebinar to collect clients for affiliate marketing. In those cases, they found some features were missing with respect to some of the competition. And the worst part is the price."

"Webex could improve the performance."

"The product needs to improve its integration. I'm not sure how difficult it is for the IT team to set up the integration. Once set up, it's easy but still not as straightforward as other platforms, like Microsoft Teams, where everything is within the same technical environment. To ensure further security, face authentication should also be added for all internal corporate users logged into the platform."

"In terms of features, it would be beneficial for Webex to focus on improving its chat functionality to make it more user-friendly. Additionally, enhancing communication operations to create a friendlier user experience would be advantageous. Other individuals who have tried using it faced challenges when attempting to share content with third parties during conversations or meetings."

"The initial implementation was a bit difficult. If they could simplify that aspect of the solution, it would be helpful for future users."

"The base application uses a lot of resources. They could work on the performance of the application so that it's less heavy."

"There could be a feature available to record the meetings."

"Webex's translation feature could work more accurately."

"They should integrate the solution with multiple hardware vendors."

More Webex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a monthly subscription and the price is quite expensive if you're not paying annually."

"This is a free solution."

"I use the free version, not the enterprise version. The only compelling reason to go for paid WebEx pay is if you're hosting large meetings."

"We purchase the product's yearly license. It is expensive."

"I use the solution for free because I don't use the solution's enterprise version."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"There is a need to pay the licensing charges to use Webex Enterprise Edition."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

"Features matter more than the price for us. As long as we get all the features we want and it fits our budget, then the price doesn't matter. I can't speak for other companies. We have tried other applications, and we run into some problems that we don't see in Webex."

"Webex is very expensive."

More Webex pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Marketing Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Webex?

Webex improved our overall team collaboration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webex?

Webex can be simplified in terms of user interface, where many features should be displayed in a compact view, with similar features grouped together and a minimalistic design helping users underst...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Teams vs GoToWebinar

Compared 20% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs GoToWebinar

Compared 19% of the time

PGi GlobalMeet vs GoToWebinar

Compared 10% of the time

GoToMeeting vs GoToWebinar

Compared 9% of the time

Skype for Business vs GoToWebinar

Compared 9% of the time

More GoToWebinar Competitors

Zoom Workplace Business vs Webex

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Webex

Compared 7% of the time

GoToMeeting vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

Skype for Business vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

TeamViewer vs Webex

Compared 5% of the time

More Webex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar

March 2026

Download GoToWebinar product report

Buyer's Guide

Webex

February 2026

Download Webex product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco Spark

Overview

Web conferencing SaaS for larger webinars

GoTo

Webex is designed to help companies improve communication and increase productivity with unlimited HD video meetings in shared meeting spaces.

Companies can use Webex, a Cisco product, to collaborate with peers, share documents and other information, create high-impact webinars and online events, and present dynamic online courses. It can be tailored to your exact company needs and can be fully integrated with mobile apps for iPhone, iPad, Android, and BlackBerry.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Avigilon Corporation, Bitdefender, British Library's Business & IP Centre, Business Wire, Clarity, Colt, Conversion Rate Experts, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., DemandGen, DPR Construction

Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar vs. Webex

March 2026

Free Report: GoToWebinar vs. Webex

Find out what your peers are saying about GoToWebinar vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoToWebinar vs. Webex report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.