GoToWebinar vs Microsoft Teams comparison

GoTo and Microsoft are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. GoTo is ranked #24, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. GoTo holds a 2.0% mindshare in VM, compared to Microsoft’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

GoToWebinar

Read 8 GoToWebinar reviews

215 Views
173 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Teams

Read 163 Microsoft Teams reviews

419 Views
160 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GoToWebinar

Microsoft Teams

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

GoToWebinar and Microsoft Teams are products in the web conferencing category, each addressing unique business requirements. Microsoft Teams seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set, catering to a broader range of collaboration needs.

Features: GoToWebinar offers high-quality webinar capabilities with features like automatic recording and transcription, polling, and in-depth analytics. Microsoft Teams provides a comprehensive suite for team collaboration, integrating chat, file sharing, and video conferencing.

Room for Improvement: GoToWebinar could enhance its integration with other business tools, improve user interface flexibility, and expand its mobile platform capabilities. Microsoft Teams might improve its interface speed, reduce resource demands, and expand its webinar-specific features for larger audiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoToWebinar provides an uncomplicated setup with reliable customer support, ideal for standalone webinar services. Microsoft Teams offers seamless integration with Microsoft 365 tools, simplifying deployment for organizations already utilizing these products, ensuring a smoother user experience.

Pricing and ROI: GoToWebinar operates on a subscription-based model focusing on webinar functions, with ROI depending on usage. Microsoft Teams, bundled with most Microsoft 365 plans, emerges as a cost-effective solution with potential for higher ROI due to its varied functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoToWebinar

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Teams

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of GoToWebinar is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 2.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

RITA Conroy-Martin

Director of Marketing at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Video library is a great tool and it enables good customization; feels a little antiquated and rusty

I like that recordings are available immediately, it's a great feature. I also appreciate being able to use the video library as a tool, and the integration of an API with other systems we have. We were able to build our own customer portal and then integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface. People thought they were on our platform, but they were using GoToWebinar. Those are unique features that seemed to be very easy for our development team to integrate. I like that aspect of it. It also provides good visibility if somebody had seen a webinar that was useful. It's very easy to push them out. Registration is an easy process as is customization on the back end. We very rarely had technical issues running the webinars so it's a pretty robust platform overall.

Read full review

Santhosh Varghese

Director - Cloud Security at Mastercard

Whiteboard and content sharing features are good

I would rate Teams's stability as a nine out of ten. However, some recent updates have made it less stable. I find it a little bit choppy. Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth. So, sometimes, when you have low bandwidth the quality becomes very poor. So, you have to optimize your usage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All of their features are good. They are more or less equivalent to the competition. There's less disturbance, less jitter, the voice is always good even at a low bandwidth."

"We were able to build our own customer portal and integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface."

"This solution is very reliable. It is easy to switch between audio and microphone when using headphones."

"I can extract the activity and the attendance reports, along with every single question that was asked during the webinar, which is a feature that we highly value."

"The interface is browser-based and simple, which is an advantage over other solutions."

"Setting up Teams was not difficult."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format."

"This solution is great for ad hoc video conferencing. It's so easy to start a meeting."

"Message and chat retention is a valuable feature."

"Multiple channels and tools for recording."

"Microsoft Teams can facilitate the broadcast of information and distribution of tasks through a single platform."

"It is a scalable solution."

"We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Microsoft Teams pros

Cons

"The chat window and using polls is easier in Zoom than compared to GoToWebinar. Make it simpler and easier to publish polls on the fly would improve the solution."

"The platform feels old and a little rusty, more could be invested into the look and feel of it."

"Some of my friends also use GoToWebinar to collect clients for affiliate marketing. In those cases, they found some features were missing with respect to some of the competition. And the worst part is the price."

"GoToWebinar would be improved with the inclusion of support for video endpoints."

"The sharing of cameras is limited to meeting organizers."

"We cannot change the mic automatically in Microsoft Teams. We have to do it manually."

"I don't like the online version of Word and Excel. It skews the layout. It is no longer representative of the layout that you actually have in a document. You always have to open it in the desktop application to get an accurate representation of how the document will look."

"One thing that needs improvement in the solution is licensing tools within the application, preferably on a per-user basis. Also, it would be great if the contacts list could be synced between it and Outlook. If I receive an email in Outlook, I can easily create a meeting with that person's credentials. But I must manually find and enter their email address in Microsoft Teams. It's a small thing, but it can be frustrating."

"User interface could be improved"

"I didn't know that Teams is part of Office 365, so I think that it should be better advertised with its features and capabilities."

"Its stability could be better."

"I have faced issues with connection. Maybe, it's an issue from my side. The company accounts in Teams has some issues as well. I could not establish calls with certain domains, and then the product asked me to buy a professional account. The problem with Teams is that they are split between professional or company accounts and personal accounts. It's not very clear how you can go from one to another. That's the main issue with teams."

"The product needs to improve its security."

More Microsoft Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a free solution."

"It is a monthly subscription and the price is quite expensive if you're not paying annually."

"The tool is cheaper than Google Meet. I rate it a three out of four."

"The tool's price is high. We purchase Microsoft Office 365 on per user basis and we get support also on that basis."

"It is expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

"The solution's pricing is average."

"It is affordable because it also includes the licenses on Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and SharePoint."

"The solution is part of enterprise Microsoft 365 licensing."

"You don't buy only the Teams license; you buy it as part of the Microsoft 365 bundle."

More Microsoft Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

73%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?

I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party comp...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?

Improvements could be made in utilizing AI features, such as getting a transcript of meetings. During my usage, there were no AI features available.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 30% of the time

Symphony vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 23% of the time

SharePoint vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 13% of the time

Loom vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 11% of the time

Huddle vs Microsoft Teams

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar

February 2025

Download GoToWebinar product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Teams

February 2025

Download Microsoft Teams product report

Also Known As

No data available

MS Teams

Overview

Web conferencing SaaS for larger webinars

GoTo

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Avigilon Corporation, Bitdefender, British Library's Business & IP Centre, Business Wire, Clarity, Colt, Conversion Rate Experts, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., DemandGen, DPR Construction

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams

January 2025

Free Report: GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.