Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian Confluence
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
105
Ranking in other categories
Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (2nd), Knowledge Management Software (1st)
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
163
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Atlassian Confluence is 9.8%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 11.8%, down from 19.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

RabindraMaharana - PeerSpot reviewer
Editing features improve document accessibility
There is a holiday calendar, however, I need to install an app or add something to it. The add-on feature is not readily available or well-documented. Guidance on this should be available in a forum. Recently, I used a feature in another tool—perhaps GitHub—where it helped prepare a chart. It involved listing resources, like having fifteen people in the X team, ten in the Y team, and seven in the Z team. It created a bar chart showing these numbers. This chart used AI to offer users the option to create it based on the data. It was then created on a separate page and made available.
Santhosh Varghese - PeerSpot reviewer
Whiteboard and content sharing features are good
I would rate Teams's stability as a nine out of ten. However, some recent updates have made it less stable. I find it a little bit choppy. Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth. So, sometimes, when you have low bandwidth the quality becomes very poor. So, you have to optimize your usage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The sharing of information and simple formatting are valuable features. That is, there are no templates, and everything uses one format. This means that people don't need to worry about formatting."
"We have found limiting permissions and history very valuable."
"The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"The best feature is document management."
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"For me, the most valuable feature is its high performance. It's crucial for us in the bank, as we handle a massive number of transactions every day."
"It is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its video calling feature which makes it easier to work on the solution."
"The solution integrates with project management products like Jira."
"Microsoft Teams is user-friendly and flexible. I like its SharePoint feature also."
"The solution is perfect and works pretty well. It gets your streaming and helps to get your calls. I like it a lot."
"The solution helps with collaborative communication. You can use it to chat and book calls. You can even set the status as away. It also has a transcript feature integrated."
"What I use the most is the plugin or the optimization feature."
"The solution has calendars that help us to manage work."
"The solution's technical support team is helpful."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in maybe the tree structure for articles. If you have a lot of articles, it becomes difficult to navigate."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"The user interface could be improved."
"I'd like to see some improved reporting on usage."
"Indentation and other basic word processing styles must be improved."
"Atlassian should rethink its withdrawal of the self-hosted version of the product. They only offer cloud-based service or the "datacenter-edition", which is quite expensive for small companies and private users."
"The solution is not very user-friendly."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"The integration with SharePoint can be cumbersome at times."
"I'd like to see better document-sharing capabilities. Sharing multiple documents during a meeting can take time, especially on Mac. On Windows, you can switch shared content on the fly, but on Mac, I often have to stop sharing and then choose another window to share."
"After six months of working with it, I still find the UI a little clunky when it comes to sharing content and moving around between features like the calendar and files."
"The tool has two versions: the desktop application installed on the computer and the web-based version. There are some differences between the two. For example, from the browser, you can pin it on the taskbar without installing the application, similar to Google Chat. You can also use the installed desktop application you download from the web."
"Teams doesn't always sync to show as Do Not Disturb during Outlook meetings."
"Microsoft Teams should include better integration of the multi-viewer webinar-type system."
"Microsoft Teams becomes complicated when used with SharePoint. It needs to improve its integration with other Office 365 tools."
"In future releases, short voice messages would be useful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The issues I have with the pricing are in respect to the add-ons."
"Making integration with other tools easier would be beneficial."
"We have a site license for Atlassian Confluence and there are some limitations on external users."
"The price of the on-premises data center version is too expensive."
"There is an annual license."
"Pricing wise, it ends up being an expensive solution. In the beginning it's cheap, but by the time you have all the functions you need, it turns out to be expensive."
"The product is neither cheap nor expensive, meaning its price falls somewhere in the mid-range zone."
"For us, it's free to use. We don't pay any licensing."
"The product is expensive."
"I don't think the solution is as expensive as big Webex licenses. It doesn't usually offer one-on-one licenses, so it's hard to compare. It's more expensive than the Google equivalent, but you can't replace Microsoft Teams with Google's offering."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"We have a license needed to use Microsoft Teams."
"The solution's cost is high."
"It costs around $12 for SharePoint and Teams per user."
"My understanding is that there are licensing fees, but I'm not sure how much they might be."
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution because it's included in the Microsoft 365 suite."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

NC
Nov 17, 2021
Nov 17, 2021
Because Microsoft Teams is not a wiki, therefore it makes no sense to compare it to Confluence, a wiki. And one should be careful not to store wiki content in (Teams) chats because the data in the chat is not structured and is very difficult to find again. We would never choose Atlassian products again because the prices increase very much every year, longstanding errors are not fixed, the lic...
See 2 answers
TS
Oct 18, 2021
Because Microsoft Teams is not a wiki, therefore it makes no sense to compare it to Confluence, a wiki. And one should be careful not to store wiki content in (Teams) chats because the data in the chat is not structured and is very difficult to find again. We would never choose Atlassian products again because the prices increase very much every year, longstanding errors are not fixed, the licensing for on-premise is exorbitantly high and you are practically forced to store the data on the Atlassian servers. That's why we have several projects underway that aim to replace JIRA, Confluence, etc. And it is a great joy and relief for all team members to be getting closer to this goal.
Nov 17, 2021
Microsoft Teams has good conference call quality and is perfect for large group meetings - the up to 90k+ capacity is amazing! The simplicity of scheduling for video conferencing, especially when using Outlook for email and calendar, makes everything very easy. One click to schedule the meeting, one click activates the meeting. It's that easy. They offer different options with backgrounds, which our teams like very much. One favorite feature is the repository, which is great for knowledge management. We can store and retrieve documents, maintain control, and collaborate freely and easily with each other. We would like to see the same functionality between mobile and desktop applications, though. Some of the features vary greatly and this can make things difficult. Microsoft Teams takes up a lot of bandwidth, which can slow things down at peak times. This can also affect things like screen sharing, downloading, and losing sound and video. The Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence is great. Atlassian Confluence is extremely intuitive and user-friendly; you don’t have to be tech-savvy to use it. Atlassian Confluence has a great offering of templates that can be used for just about any situation, such as creating documents, charts, or enhanced tables. The hyper-linking and drawing tools are one of our favorite features. Atlassian Confluence recently stopped offering the self-hosted version of the product. The cloud-based service currently offered can be very expensive for smaller companies. There could also be more flexibility when it comes to editing a page to make it look the way you want it to look. Conclusion For what we were looking for, we felt Microsoft Teams was the best fit. You get great collaborative options, documentation workflows, and follow-up. The additional benefit of extraordinary call conferencing options that are fully integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem made it a very easy choice for us.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
74%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Computer Software Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Educational Organization
73%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlassian Confluence?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from its document-controlling feature. In Atlassian Confluence, controlled documents cannot be edited by anyone else.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian Confluence?
With Atlassian, the costs are reasonable. Although higher than before when we used multiple platforms and licenses, having a collaborative platform like this is advantageous. It streamlines license...
What needs improvement with Atlassian Confluence?
There is a holiday calendar, however, I need to install an app or add something to it. The add-on feature is not readily available or well-documented. Guidance on this should be available in a foru...
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party comp...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Improvements could be made in utilizing AI features, such as getting a transcript of meetings. During my usage, there were no AI features available.
 

Also Known As

Confluence
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, Skype, Microsoft, NASA, Netflix, Adobe, Bonobos, LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.