Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Loom vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Loom
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
15th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
162
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Loom is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 11.9%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Gerald Chioke - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-deploy solution that allows users to record videos seamlessly for presentation and collaboration
I use Loom to record my screen for issues and bugs. I can also record my voice The product has helped me to present the recording of my work. I can easily record my screen and show what I did. It is like a walk-through of the work I do. The solution allows me to do it seamlessly. The ability to…
Santhosh Varghese - PeerSpot reviewer
Whiteboard and content sharing features are good
I would rate Teams's stability as a nine out of ten. However, some recent updates have made it less stable. I find it a little bit choppy. Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth. So, sometimes, when you have low bandwidth the quality becomes very poor. So, you have to optimize your usage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product."
"We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"You can add teams to a conversation. You can create reports, project plans, or many other things based on Microsoft solutions. It has improved communication between teams and within each team."
"I like the product's screen share feature since we can explain things to the users at the other end using it. The solution helps me to establish a virtual connection with my team."
"You can use Microsoft Teams to chat with people, share your documents, manage your calendar, manage your project, and assign tasks."
"The most valuable feature for me is the chat."
"I like the video call and document-sharing features."
"We use Microsoft Teams for group communications."
"Microsoft Teams is user-friendly and flexible. I like its SharePoint feature also."
 

Cons

"The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time."
"The solution is very expensive and I won't be able to afford it personally."
"The application's user interface on Google has shortcomings that need to be improved."
"We have experienced response delays with the product. It can be hard to understand where to click in the solution. Also, the solution should incorporate videos like 'How to use Teams' that can be popularized among customers."
"The chat option in the Teams tab is not very helpful. We don't use it very often. There is also an expiration on the recordings. It would be useful to not have a time limit."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams."
"There can be more customization and also the task management tools needs better tools for integration."
"There are some issues with stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution's pricing is average."
"We don't have to pay for the solution."
"We have a license needed to use Microsoft Teams."
"The solution is part of enterprise Microsoft 365 licensing."
"Microsoft Teams is priced less than other solutions, such as Bridge."
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution."
"The tool is cheaper than Google Meet. I rate it a three out of four."
"I use Teams' free version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
70%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Loom?
The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product.
What needs improvement with Loom?
The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time. I cannot use the product on my phone. The product must provide a mobile version of the product. Sometimes, when we record, it takes...
What is your primary use case for Loom?
I use Loom to record my screen for issues and bugs. I can also record my voice.
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party comp...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Everything is running smoothly, and I’m still exploring more features. As for improvements, I think it could be more user-friendly and integrate better with third-party software, like Zoom and othe...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Teams
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

hubspot, airtable, grubhub
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.