Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Halliburton Aries Petroleum...
Ranking in Production Planning
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in Production Planning
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
ERP (9th), Activity Based Costing Software (4th), Demand Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Production Planning category, the mindshare of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is 11.6%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 12.8%, up from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Production Planning Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne12.8%
Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software11.6%
Other75.6%
Production Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Jacobo Ortiz Avila - PeerSpot reviewer
Production Engineer at Parex Resources Inc
Has supported data integration across teams but lacks advanced analytics features
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software's decline curve analysis. It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve. If it is only a linear regression that you could get from the data, that would be a mistake. If you could adjust the parameters according to the engineering criteria, that would be interesting. But if it's an inferred value for the parameters, that gives you a scenario where you lose control, and you stop trusting the decline curve. Python is important because you could take out outliers from your data and describe properly the function that could describe your trend. It is necessary to have engineering capability to properly forecast. My experience with the pricing of this product limits us regarding the amount of licenses we could get, so it's challenging. The integration with other software helps us; we integrate with the platform through SQL, but it's the only connection we have experienced.
Euan Ellis - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization
Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best features of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software are that they attempt to integrate everything coming from the field; every data point that we could get from the field creates a database not only from production but also the mechanical status the wells have."
"The solution excels in costing and work order processing. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne manages multiple manufacturing modes in the same process effectively."
"We compared one company which was working on SAP and converted to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, and it was a big company that converted from SAP to JD Edwards."
"The modular design of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps my organization customize its ERP functionalities because that's one of the key features of the software."
"The financials are great."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
 

Cons

"It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."
"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."
"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a lot of value for the money. The implementation cost and license cost are quite reasonable compared to other solutions, such as Oracle EBS or SAP."
"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."
"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."
"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."
"EnterpriseOne is cost-effective for large enterprises."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Production Planning solutions are best for your needs.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
33%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
7%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petr...
What is your primary use case for Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
This software is for production planning. It gathers production data from the field, which is my main use case.
What advice do you have for others considering Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
We are working with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software, and I can provide a review regarding different reporting tools or monitoring tools. I would give them a rating of seven out of ten...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.
 

Also Known As

Aries Petroleum Economic Software
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
Find out what your peers are saying about Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.