QlikView vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

Information Builders and Qlik are both solutions in the Embedded BI category. Information Builders is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Information Builders holds a 1.6% mindshare in EBT, compared to Qlik’s 8.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Information Builders users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

ibi WebFOCUS

Read 18 ibi WebFOCUS reviews

231 Views
178 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 161 QlikView reviews

1,028 Views
913 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ibi WebFOCUS

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ibi WebFOCUS and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Embedded BI solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ibi WebFOCUS

Ranking in Embedded BI

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Predictive Analytics (7th)

QlikView

Ranking in Embedded BI

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

Reporting (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Embedded BI category, the mindshare of ibi WebFOCUS is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 8.1%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Embedded BI

Featured Reviews

Twanette Jurd

Technical Director / Solutions Architect at InfoBuild

Business Intelligence, reporting, data integration, ETL, data migration - everything is handled within one unified platform and highly scalable solution.

WebFOCUS goes beyond just dashboards. It's also used for operational reporting, making it crucial for mission-critical systems. In fact, a core strength is that it's not "just" a BI tool; it can be used to build complete applications. It is the best tool because of its all-in-one nature. Data integration, ETL, data migration, everything is handled within the same platform. Then, on the front end, it offers portals, reporting, distributed analysis, and more. For customers who have data in the right structure and right format, the WebFOCUS Designer tool is very powerful. It allows them to create self-service reporting applications.

Read full review

Arjun Meda

Assistant Vice President at HSBC India

Useful for data visualization and business intelligence

Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView used to be a way more customizable tool than Qlik Sense is in the present time. Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times. Hiding off the apps in the app overview tab based on the access was a really good feature that needs to be introduced back in the product since I see that, at the moment, there are multiple groups on the tool, owing to which multiple changes on the QMC part is required to handle the solution. Only the person with access to the dashboard in QlikView could have a link to the dashboard through QlikView's hub or access points. With Qlik Sense, one can see whatever is available in the stream. If a user wants to control everything in the product, then there is no need to make multiple changes in the QMC at the individual app level. The aforementioned area can be considered to improve Qlik Sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is building ad hoc reports."

"The solution can read and write 500 different types of outputs."

"It stands out for its ability to work across different platforms, support mainframe data, offer cloud integration, automate report scheduling, and provide a robust scripting language."

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's highly scalable and can handle significant data volumes."

"The most valuable feature of QlikView is the integration with other third-party tools."

"This solution has simplified getting to and understanding our data, no matter where it is housed."

"One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running."

"Once you open it up, you see everything that you can do."

"The language support is very good."

"E-T-L, The Extract, Transform, and Loading capabilities of QlikView make it a highly sophisticated self-service business intelligence tool for developers and analysts."

"On the positive side, QlikView's scripting is a great asset as it functions as an ETL."

"You can do a lot of things on the back end which are not possible in the other solutions on the market."

More QlikView pros

Cons

"The challenge lies not in what the tool can do but in how you use it and understand the data."

"If there were to be any improvements right now, their documentation needs to get in sync with their product."

"The solution can be improved by adding more automated options for reporting."

"When it comes to customer support, we don't always reach the right person. Sometimes, we get junior-level reps who aren't as knowledgeable as we are."

"They could provide a user-friendly analysis process rather than specialized IT resource code."

"Though the initial setup phase is simple, when it comes to the integration with the custom systems, the configuration and the compatibility sometimes take some more time."

"If a user wanted to see something not included in the application the new object had to be created by a power user or developer because Qlik view's scripting has somewhat of a learning curve."

"I would want them to have more options as a user. It would be nice for them to create their own dashboards and add fields."

"The pricing is high."

"The user interface is old."

"I really wish the application was easier to use in the development phase."

"For me, it is important to have a mix, what is the "view" and what is the "sense", Qlik Sense. They have two tools, but for me it is important to have only one tool, which combines the functions that we have from one side and the other side."

More QlikView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."

"It's reasonably priced and falls on the more affordable side."

"It is expensive for small companies."

"Its licensing costs are moderate, but it can get expensive due to the numerous add-ons available like those for printing."

"The platform's pricing is considered quite expensive, particularly given the dollar-based pricing."

"It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."

"The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head at NVidia

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Information Builders WebFOCUS?

I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Information Builders WebFOCUS?

Documentation could definitely be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Information Builders WebFOCUS?

I use it for supplying and developing business intelligence (BI) solutions, data management and reporting applications, and for the development of complete web-based applications. It's a versatile ...

See all answers

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

Qlik Sense's licensing metrics are flexible. They provide packages based on needs, like named licenses, developer licenses, or shared pool licenses. There is also a core-based license option for or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes. Qlik Sense offers a more modern approach with self-service features, allowing users to build dashb...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 47% of the time

Tableau vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 37% of the time

Databricks vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 16% of the time

More ibi WebFOCUS Competitors

Tableau vs QlikView

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Cognos vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

MicroStrategy vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ibi WebFOCUS

December 2024

Download ibi WebFOCUS product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

December 2024

Download QlikView product report

Also Known As

WebFOCUS

No data available

Learn More

Information Builders

Qlik

Overview

WebFOCUS is a strategic enterprise business intelligence (BI) and analytics platform that enables any executive, manager, analyst, employee, partner, or customer to execute smarter business from trusted data. The platform includes cutting-edge capabilities that provide organizations with everything they need to turn data into insight, and insight into impact.

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Sample Customers

Ace Hardware, AutoZone, Fred Hutch, MasterCard, OFS Brands, PostFinance, Real D, Yellow Pages, ABC Financial, AcuSport, BBVA, Babcock

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS

December 2024

Free Report: QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS

Find out what your peers are saying about QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS report.

See our list of best Embedded BI vendors.

We monitor all Embedded BI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.