QlikView vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

Information Builders and Qlik are both solutions in the Embedded BI category. Information Builders is ranked #16, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Information Builders holds a 2.2% mindshare in EBT, compared to Qlik’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Information Builders users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

ibi WebFOCUS

Read 18 ibi WebFOCUS reviews

1,835 Views
551 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 163 QlikView reviews

7,316 Views
2,634 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ibi WebFOCUS

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

QlikView and ibi WebFOCUS compete in the business intelligence sector. QlikView seems to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, while ibi WebFOCUS provides extensive functionality that may justify its higher price.

Features: QlikView offers powerful data visualization, ad hoc reporting, and an interactive graphical interface. Its in-memory processing and associative querying enable quick and flexible data analysis. On the other hand, ibi WebFOCUS excels in data integration, comprehensive data management, and embedded analytics, providing advanced security and large-scale reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: QlikView can improve in scalability for massive datasets and augment its drag-and-drop feature to match competitors. Additional script automation and integration with non-standard database sources are also areas to explore. ibi WebFOCUS might benefit from plans that cater to smaller businesses, reducing dependencies on internal resources for deployment, and enhancing user-friendly customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView facilitates a straightforward deployment process with robust customer support, making it appealing for a variety of businesses. ibi WebFOCUS, while also offering solid customer service, involves more configuration during deployment but offers tailored solutions for complex enterprises, appealing to those requiring extensive customization and integration.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView is praised for its cost-effectiveness, offering quick ROI due to its user-friendly platform and lower implementation costs. Ibi WebFOCUS, requiring a larger initial investment, promises higher long-term benefits owing to its extensive capabilities. For cost-sensitive buyers, QlikView remains attractive, while ibi WebFOCUS can deliver significant returns for complex data needs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,678 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Using ibi WebFOCUS, significant cost savings are achieved with improved processes and high returns, reducing downtime expenses.

Sentiment score

6.4

QlikView ROI appears through time savings, decision-making improvements, and efficient deployment, despite licensing complexity impacting perception.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

3.6

ibi WebFOCUS support is knowledgeable and prompt, with personalized service, though reaching experts for advanced issues may be challenging.

Sentiment score

6.1

QlikView's customer support is highly rated, with quick responses, a helpful community, and generally strong availability despite geographic factors.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

I would rate the customer support a solid 10.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

I am totally satisfied with technical support from Qlik.

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.6

ibi WebFOCUS efficiently manages large-scale applications, supporting both small and large entities, impressing diverse sectors with scalability.

Sentiment score

7.0

QlikView scales well with efficient resource management, but superior scalability features are found in Qlik Sense, requiring robust infrastructure.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

If you want better performance with a larger volume of data, you can simply add an additional server.

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

Users praise ibi WebFOCUS for its stability, quick issue resolution, and lower maintenance compared to IBM products.

Sentiment score

7.7

Users rate QlikView's stability highly, with issues mainly due to infrastructure or large data, resolved with hardware tweaks.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Room For Improvement

Users seek an intuitive interface, improved documentation, simpler security, better SQL embedding, and enhanced charting and training in ibi WebFOCUS.

QlikView needs a more intuitive interface, better scalability, integration, predictive analytics, and cost-effective licensing for improved user experience.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

AI features are already available in Qlik Sense, so you would need to migrate to that platform.

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Setup Cost

ibi WebFOCUS offers competitive, scalable pricing with a CPU-based license, ideal for enterprises focused on BI and process improvement.

QlikView pricing is variable and can be costly, but strategic planning can maximize ROI for organizations.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Valuable Features

WebFOCUS provides intuitive visualization, robust connectivity, flexible reporting, and reliable scheduling, supporting comprehensive data integration and application development.

QlikView offers powerful data analysis with dynamic dashboards, intuitive interface, and rapid visualization for enhanced business performance and insights.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ibi WebFOCUS report

Data integration capabilities are quite good; you can integrate any information stored anywhere in different systems with QlikView.

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Categories and Ranking

ibi WebFOCUS

Ranking in Embedded BI

16th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Predictive Analytics (7th)

QlikView

Ranking in Embedded BI

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Reporting (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Embedded BI category, the mindshare of ibi WebFOCUS is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 7.7%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Embedded BI Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
QlikView	7.7%
ibi WebFOCUS	2.2%
Other	90.1%

Embedded BI

Featured Reviews

Twanette Jurd

Technical Director / Solutions Architect at InfoBuild

Business Intelligence, reporting, data integration, ETL, data migration - everything is handled within one unified platform and highly scalable solution.

WebFOCUS goes beyond just dashboards. It's also used for operational reporting, making it crucial for mission-critical systems. In fact, a core strength is that it's not "just" a BI tool; it can be used to build complete applications. It is the best tool because of its all-in-one nature. Data integration, ETL, data migration, everything is handled within the same platform. Then, on the front end, it offers portals, reporting, distributed analysis, and more. For customers who have data in the right structure and right format, the WebFOCUS Designer tool is very powerful. It allows them to create self-service reporting applications.

Read full review

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Daily invoice analytics has become streamlined and complex data modeling is now simplified

We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only tabular presentation of data because that is what we need. Presenting a large volume of data in QlikView with graphics can be overwhelming for the majority of people who want to see a lot of information in one picture. It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView. However, I think they will decommission QlikView, and AI features are already available in Qlik Sense, so you would need to migrate to that platform.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	76

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for QlikView?

The primary use case involves analyzing data on a daily invoice level with QlikView. Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tableau Enterprise vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 16% of the time

Red Hat Lightspeed vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 10% of the time

PredicSis vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 8% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs ibi WebFOCUS

Compared 6% of the time

More ibi WebFOCUS Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 13% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs QlikView

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 4% of the time

Zendesk vs QlikView

Compared 4% of the time

MicroStrategy vs QlikView

Compared 4% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ibi WebFOCUS

April 2026

Download ibi WebFOCUS product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

April 2026

Download QlikView product report

Also Known As

WebFOCUS

No data available

Overview

ibi WebFOCUS is a dynamic analytics platform with strengths in report building, self-service reporting, and data visualization. It integrates seamlessly across platforms and supports cloud environments, aiming to optimize analytics and decision-making processes.

ibi WebFOCUS provides comprehensive tools for analytics, including ad hoc report capabilities and a versatile interface with drag and drop functionality. It supports multi-platform operations, incorporates cloud integration, and automates reports with robust scheduling features. Its scripting capabilities enhance its flexibility, making it suitable for diverse analytical needs. Users utilize WebFOCUS Designer and Report Caster for advanced reporting and predictive analytics. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in automation, user documentation, and interface intuitiveness, along with simplified security and SQL embedding solutions.

What are the key features of ibi WebFOCUS?

Ad Hoc Report Building: Facilitates customized reporting based on user requirements.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers drag and drop and intuitive design.
Robust Data Visualization: Enhances insight with detailed graphics.
Meta Data Canvas: Streamlines data management and accessibility.
Customizable PDF Reports: Allows tailored report generation.
Versatile Output Options: Supports multiple formats for varied needs.
Self-Service Reporting: Empowers users with independent data access.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Flexibility: Adaptable to different industry uses and data requirements.
Ease of Use: Simplifies analytical tasks for users of all skill levels.
Predictive Analytics: Offers foresight into trends and outcomes.
Powerful Reporting Tools: Includes tools like Report Caster for automated scheduling.

In the industry context, ibi WebFOCUS addresses analytics challenges in sectors such as healthcare, education, insurance, and law enforcement. Users develop business intelligence applications, conduct data analysis, and generate tailored reports. It's instrumental in managing finances and strategies, executing complex queries, and optimizing departmental workflows, ensuring applicability across multiple operational areas.

Information Builders

QlikView enhances data analysis with its associative data model and rapid in-memory processing, providing dynamic dashboards and robust visualization, while efficient data integration allows connections to multiple sources.

QlikView offers powerful analytics and insight generation capabilities through its integration with Salesforce, enabling real-time sales data access. Its customizable dashboards are complemented by scripting for complex calculations and QVDs for performance optimization. Designed to be user-friendly, it supports ETL processes and diverse data browsing, allowing users to interact with data intuitively. However, there is room for improving licensing complexities, scalability, and self-service functionality. Additional enhancements are desired in visualization, integration with Qlik Sense, and predictive analytics support.

What are QlikView's key features?

Data Integration: Connects seamlessly with multiple data sources for diverse data access.
Associative Data Model: Enhances data discovery and analysis.
In-memory Technology: Offers rapid data processing for efficient analysis.
Customization Options: Allows personalized dashboards and visualizations.
Salesforce Integration: Provides real-time access to sales data.
Scripting Capabilities: Facilitates complex calculations and analytics.
QVD Performance: Optimizes data loading and processing speeds.

What benefits should you look for in QlikView reviews?

Enhanced Data Access: Seamless integration allows widespread data connectivity.
Rapid Insights: In-memory technology speeds up analysis.
Flexible Customization: Tools enable tailored visualizations.
User-friendly Interaction: Non-technical users can navigate data easily.

QlikView finds use in building business intelligence dashboards across sectors, integrating with Salesforce for analytics, supporting financial planning, and tracking sales. Its intuitive interface aids manufacturing companies in KPI monitoring and informs commercial decisions. The tool enhances reporting, ETL processes, and diverse data source integration, facilitating offline data access.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Ace Hardware, AutoZone, Fred Hutch, MasterCard, OFS Brands, PostFinance, Real D, Yellow Pages, ABC Financial, AcuSport, BBVA, Babcock

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS

April 2026

Free Report: QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS

Find out what your peers are saying about QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QlikView vs. ibi WebFOCUS report.

See our list of best Embedded BI vendors.

We monitor all Embedded BI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.