IBM Cloud Video vs Zoom comparison

"I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with."

"There are lots of great features available to every user."

"The base infrastructure is robust."

"The quality of the connection from Zoom is very good. There are many functions and features available. I am only a basic user and it has more than I will ever use. It has lower bandwidths than other products that we have used and has worked well. It is important to have good quality sound and video than anything else."

"Zoom is stable and easy to use."

"The solution is easy to navigate."

"Zoom is easy to use."

"Zoom is a stable solution."

"This is the easiest product to use for videoconferencing."

"They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that."

"The solution needs to have a feature that allows you to take over another person's screen. right now, that's not possible. This is important for our purposes due to the act that we are often using the solution to troubleshoot issues for our clients. If we could just take over their screen and go in and fix issues, it would make troubleshooting infinitely easier."

"Extra security would be a good added feature."

"The video quality of the free version might not be as good as the enterprise edition."

"Variable sound quality."

"Zoom could be improved by adding more third-party integrations. They should also work on their virtual backgrounds. I think these could be more professional and creative."

"I don't have any particular issues, but I think the user interface could be improved. Previously, I used Microsoft Teams, where the chat, video, and audio options were all easily accessible in one place, making the user experience smoother. In Zoom, it's a bit more manual. For example, we must use external chat options like Slack and manually send the Zoom URL link to initiate a chat. In MicrosoftTeams, you can directly call and chat with someone from the contact list simultaneously."

"Zoom could improve by extending the one-hour maximum session time in the free version."

"Zoom will be cheaper if you want to have a general meeting, but if you want a real enterprise version, Cisco will be cheaper."

"We do not incur a licensing fee."

"We do not incur any licensing costs, as we use the free version."

"My company is using the paid version of Zoom."

"I use Zoom's free version."

"For personal use, I use the free version of Zoom, so I haven't paid anything."

"The exact costs are handled on a corporate level, however, I understand that if you just want to own a license for your small business or something like that, it's around $300 a year, which is very reasonable."

"I believe that all of their licenses are purchased, so that they may use the solution for their teaching purposes."

"Zoom can be used for free."