IBM DOORS Next vs Jira comparison

IBM and Atlassian are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.3, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 8.5% mindshare in ARM, compared to Atlassian’s 15.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

IBM DOORS Next

Read 13 IBM DOORS Next reviews

3,570 Views
1,247 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 274 Jira reviews

3,516 Views
2,431 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM DOORS Next

Jira

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Jira and IBM DOORS Next compete in the fields of project management and requirements management, respectively. Jira seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, making it attractive for cost-sensitive businesses, while IBM DOORS Next is preferred for its comprehensive features, valuable for teams focusing on detailed requirement management.

Features: Jira offers superior tools for task tracking, agile development, and project management including Kanban and Scrum boards to boost team productivity and workflow management. It also provides robust API support for customization and integration. IBM DOORS Next provides strong capabilities in requirements management, traceability, and collaboration that cater to complex engineering projects, ensuring precise compliance and data management.

Room for Improvement: Jira could enhance its offering with deeper integrated requirement management solutions, better support for non-software development industries, and improved user interface customization. IBM DOORS Next may see improvements in ease of use, particularly concerning newcomers, making training less time-consuming, and could further develop its interaction with other software management tools to streamline projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, allowing easy integration across diverse workflows with comprehensive support and documentation. Its swift deployment capabilities are beneficial for teams seeking immediate solutions. IBM DOORS Next, with its strong on-premise deployment, ensures data security while providing extensive training and support, emphasizing tailored solutions for complex environments where data integrity is crucial.

Pricing and ROI: Jira offers a cost-effective entry with scalable pricing suitable for smaller teams, providing a quick return on investment for agile-focused teams at an attractive licensing cost. Conversely, IBM DOORS Next requires higher initial investment, which potentially yields significant returns for organizations prioritizing long-term value in managing complex requirements and fostering collaboration through its premium features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DOORS Next

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jira

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

274

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Project Management Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of IBM DOORS Next is 8.5%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jira is 15.7%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Roger Trackwell

System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements

The biggest thing is that it shows cradle to grave traceability between the initial parent requirement and the lowest level, or what we call a CID, a critical item development spec. You can establish your verification plans in DOORS, and then as you get test results, you can put them in DOORS as a link or as a pointer to where that specific test resides on a company database. Then you can also write compliance rationale and add a column for coding, like pass, fail, green, yellow, red, meets, does not meet, partially meets, or whatever scoring criteria you want to use. Like I said, the best thing about it is that it provides you that visibility of your verification, allowing you to know how close you are to your pre-production activities, prototyping, go ahead, or whatever it is.

Read full review

Saroj Ekka

Technical Delivery Lead at Applied Materials

Offers good repository integration, sprint board and easy to set up

There are some features and reports we need that are not there. For example, if I have to find out the capacity of the current sprint by user and compare it with the previous sprint, that visibility isn't there. We can know the capacity and what happened with the whole sprint, but not for an individual person to see where it's falling and how it's tracking. Report and analytics capabilities are important for a product manager. That visibility is important, so we use Jira. Some of the features are there, and I use my own Excels or other data things to compensate for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules."

"It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install."

"The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually."

"My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive."

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."

"The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The traceability matrix helps to view things better. It comes with different linking rules."

"The most valuable features are the baselines and links."

"The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them."

More IBM DOORS Next pros

"Jira has a good reporting system. It also has an API, so we can do all sorts of reporting."

"The flexibility to create different flows is most valuable."

"It also works well with all the integrated tools that you buy."

"The most valuable feature is project management."

"The solution offers up great transparency that makes it possible for everyone inside the departmental organization to see what's happening."

"It handles all of the issues that we need it to do."

"Transparency of development projects, as well as approval processes for some business projects, has improved massively."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the source linking on the commit level to git."

More Jira pros

Cons

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product."

"It does have a tendency to condense the requirements. It kind of puts them in a tree format. Sometimes those trees are a little difficult."

"When you are not working on it every day it is not very intuitive."

"As a web tool, DNG can be difficult to use if the server is loaded or your network connection to it is saturated."

"Be very careful how you load your DNG server. There are limits to the number of artifacts a server can handle."

"The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools."

"I have come to the conclusion that if you are considering migrating from DOORS to DNG, don't! Instead of spending 100's to 1000's of hours doing migrations, invest those hours in a DXL programmer to make DOORS do what it isn't doing for you now."

"Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."

More IBM DOORS Next cons

"We would like to see integration between Tempo and Jira."

"There are no fields to search or to filter by, mainly the ones which use a data around a date and time when something changes."

"There should be a way to integrate the mobile application or in some way, make it more clear because at first instance, I didn't understand how to use it."

"When you first start to use the interface, it is confusing."

"If Jira would be interested in offering a SharePoint version, it would be beneficial."

"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number."

"From a very software-centric or a lead developer standpoint, there should be the ability to work at multiple levels. You have epic stories and use cases or epic stories and tasks. It would be nice to be able to have multiple levels of stories and multiple levels of epics work with it. It's lacking a little bit there, and this is the big thing for me because it makes it difficult to do a real sprint when you're limited to one story per epic. It's really hard to isolate tasks at multiple levels to match the type of use cases you normally do. That's the biggest difficulty. Other than that, they've been improving year to year, and every version seems to have a level of improvement."

"Improvements in Jira for the next release could include adding AI tools for dashboarding, making it easier to report insights, and enhancing business intelligence capabilities. It should also improve on-prem support. As far as I know, Jira's on-premise support is being discontinued. From last year onward, they stopped providing on-premise licenses and now only offer cloud support. This shift happened gradually, and I believe they now only offer cloud licenses."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You are going to need a beefy server and a fat network pipe to it in order to make DNG and its companion tools work well for users."

"The cost of maintenance is €20,000 to €30,000 ($22,000 to $33,000 USD) and there are no additional fees."

"The price of this solution is very high, and it increases year after year."

"Users can buy a three-year license for about 12,000 Euros."

"If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation."

"We are on an annual license and could be less expensive."

"Jira is expensive and a lot of people are choosing DevOps because they are cheaper, open-source, easy to use, and have basic licenses. Jira should decrease its price to be more competitive."

"Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use."

"The price of Jira is reasonable."

"Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution."

"The license is yearly. It is a large, long-running program."

"It does not cost that much."

"There are no additional costs to the standard licensing."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

51%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The tr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

The pricing is considered unreasonable, and there is speculation that IBM may not be putting much effort into further development, possibly treating it as a cash cow.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

There is a need for improvement in user experience, as the UI is too complex and outdated. Updates should be more frequent to ensure security and functionality, especially in addressing vulnerabili...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 36% of the time

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 21% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 17% of the time

3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 4% of the time

Helix ALM vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM DOORS Next Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs Jira

Compared 9% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next

April 2025

Download IBM DOORS Next product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

April 2025

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

Rational DOORS Next Generation, RDNG, Rational Requirements Composer and IBM RRC

Jira Software

Overview

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (DOORS Next) is a requirements management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It offers a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis. DOORS Next improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and aids in better decision-making through clear traceability and version control. Compared to its predecessor, DOORS 9, DOORS Next is a web-based version with a modern interface that integrates with other IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools, while DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features in a non-web-based format.

IBM

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Major health insurer

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira

April 2025

Free Report: IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.