Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Jira Align comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosted productivity by 30%, enhancing efficiency, though exact ROI calculation remains unclear over five years.
Sentiment score
7.3
Jira Align improved clarity, productivity, and ROI, despite concerns over pricing, with a noted negative return by one user.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
IBM's customer service is good; technical support varies, with some users preferring forums and local vendors over IBM support.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable and flexible but faces mixed reviews, especially regarding its reporting server and integration capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.6
Jira Align scales well, integrates with Jira, supports large teams, but poses adaptation challenges for non-technical users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM Engineering Workflow Management exhibits variable stability, with newer versions praised but challenges noted in customized deployments needing close monitoring.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management struggles with complex UI, sluggish performance, limited customization, and lacks features compared to competitors.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is complex and costly, but users find it cost-effective with justified ROI despite high expenses.
Jira Align is costly, with pricing based on user count and needs, more suitable for enterprise-scale than smaller companies.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers seamless task integration, comprehensive traceability, customizable reports, agile templates, and robust resource management features.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (5th)
Jira Align
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (9th), Value Stream Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jira Align is 4.5%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Tonia Spight-Sokoya - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly with good documentation and the ability to integrate with other third arty vendors
I am really focused on identity access management and getting access to the vendors. Right now, I'm setting up vendor access through Azure. You can do that or with the IAM. Sometimes we have to create several different types of access because we have vaulted databases. We have the Unix databases, I have MySQL, and we have Mongo, where I get access to those user classes or to the databases in the host group. Those are all different access scenario forms that I submit after I do the configuration in the form with the security team. I need clarity on the IAM. I'm not clear on PAM eighter. Is there a form that they have to submit to get access to the internal cyber-risk teams to get their access for people to be able to use the tool on the Confluence side? Do they have to send some kind of form to the operation's security or enterprise security? To be able to get the access for privileged access, do they need to be working on projects that have vaulted databases? I still need to figure out how that works. Other companies that are competitors of Jira and Confluence, are able to create their active directories for the vendors that don't come in internally. They only do access through the cloud and through third-party, two-factor identification. That's something I was wondering if that was already implemented in the packages, the package for Confluence. It would be nice to have that right in the solution.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
21%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
It's becoming less relevant for us, as we move to cloud-based and more contemporary cloud-based SCM systems such as GitHub. As new JDKs have been released over the years, tooling support in new rel...
What do you like most about Jira Align?
I joined the company because they had a large project, and as a startup company, they needed to scale up efficiently. My task was to review the current baseline, assess the team's capabilities, and...
What needs improvement with Jira Align?
The platform's communication features could be more robust for better team integration.
What is your primary use case for Jira Align?
We use Jira Align for business strategies, collaboration, and reporting. The solution allows us to manage the various products and features delivered on that platform.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
AgileCraft
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Anthem, nielsen, Homeland Security, NCR, dimension data
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira Align and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.