IBM OpenPages vs SAI360 comparison

IBM and SAI Global are both solutions in the GRC category. IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7, while SAI Global is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 5.9% mindshare in G, compared to SAI Global’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAI Global users who would recommend it.

IBM OpenPages

Read 7 IBM OpenPages reviews

1,097 Views
772 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

SAI360

Read 1 SAI360 review

393 Views
216 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM OpenPages

SAI360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM OpenPages and SAI360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, AuditBoard and others in GRC.

To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GRC

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM OpenPages

Ranking in GRC

7th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (2nd)

SAI360

Ranking in GRC

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (15th), Data Privacy Management Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of IBM OpenPages is 5.9%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAI360 is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC

Featured Reviews

Seetha Pullela

Developer & Consultant at Aligne technologies

Enhanced risk management with useful reports and easy to deploy

We have deployed the ORM module in our bank. We have our businesses listed in the application, and we identify risks. We manage multiple controls, assess historical controls, and monitor these controls using test source control monitoring and management. We have recently started using the Assurant…

Read full review

DanielGarcia3

Risk Management Practice Lead at VERDANTIX LIMITED

Offers a reasonable amount of ROI and helps save costs

I use SAI360 in our company's day-to-day risk and compliance activity, depending on the need for the tool's role, of course. The solution's most beneficial feature for improving our company's compliance processes stems from how it helps with the connectivity between functionalities. In terms of risk management capabilities, I feel SAI360 is a very well-connected GRC tooling system. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. The trends I am observing in the risk and compliance space that SAI360 is helping our company address revolve around the area of connectivity across our entire organization. I rate the tool an eight to nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything about IBM OpenPages is valuable, particularly when compared to other solutions in the market like MetricStream, from which we switched due to its feasibility, user-friendliness, and performance."

"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."

"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."

"The product’s interface is very intuitive."

"The most valuable features are the workflow engine, calculations, and security rules."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

Cons

"Some self-relationships are not available in OpenPages' relationship model."

"It would be useful to have more out-of-the-box functionality, especially triggers and calculations."

"The solution must allow customization in reporting."

"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."

"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."

"If the product is used in a small organization, it doesn't work well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's price an eight."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

32%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM OpenPages?

The product’s interface is very intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM OpenPages?

It would be useful to have more out-of-the-box functionality, especially triggers and calculations. Additionally, more detailed documentation and video-oriented resources would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM OpenPages?

See all answers

What do you like most about SAI360?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAI360?

On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's price an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAI360?

The area of improvement in the solution is something that can be stated only after looking into who is using the solution. If the product is used in a small organization, it doesn't work well. The ...

See all answers

Comparisons

RSA Archer vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 48% of the time

MetricStream vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 26% of the time

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 7% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 7% of the time

SAS Enterprise GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM OpenPages Competitors

RSA Archer vs SAI360

Compared 100% of the time

More SAI360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GRC

January 2025

Download IBM OpenPages product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

January 2025

Download SAI360 product report

Also Known As

OpenPages

Compliance 360

Learn More

IBM

Video not available

SAI Global

Overview

Enables customers to manage risk and compliance initiatives across the enterprise, helping businesses to reduce loss, improve decision-making about resource allocation, and optimize business performance.

Compliance 360 consolidates your entire program onto a single scalable cloud-based platform, it enables your team to streamline and manage your risk and compliance program. Compliance 360 establishes and implements a cost-effective system-of-record for compliance, risk, and audit management. Compliance 360 helps turn risk into a strategic imperative that generates opportunities. Proactively address risk hot-spots across the enterprise with automatic alerts and real-time reporting. Eliminate laborious processes so you can stay ahead of regulatory changes.

Sample Customers

Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Dep‹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, Unum

EMQ Families First, St. Joseph Medical Center, Methodist Hospital System

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, AuditBoard and others in GRC. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.