IFS Cloud Platform vs JD Edwards World comparison

IFS and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. IFS is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.6. IFS holds a 2.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

2,379 Views
1,504 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

JD Edwards World

Read 15 JD Edwards World reviews

939 Views
776 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

JD Edwards World

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

IFS Cloud Platform and JD Edwards World are prominent competitors in the ERP space. User reviews indicate that IFS Cloud often leads in user satisfaction regarding its integration and customization capabilities.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform offers flexible pricing models and user-based licensing, making it scalable and cost-effective for growing enterprises. Its warehouse functionality supports complex business operations with advanced analytics. JD Edwards World provides simplicity and ease of use, particularly valued in legacy systems, with a robust structure that ensures stability and a reliable user experience.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform could enhance usability by refining integration workflows and expanding reporting capabilities. JD Edwards World may benefit from modernizing its interface, enhancing cloud integration, and improving pricing structures to attract more users. Usability and interface design updates are areas for potential development in both platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IFS Cloud Platform supports various deployment models including public and private cloud environments, offering global presence albeit with varying technical support by region. JD Edwards World delivers strong on-premises support but lacks modern deployment options and faces reports of slower support response times.

Pricing and ROI: IFS Cloud Platform, while more expensive, offers extensive functionality that reportedly provides a solid ROI, especially for larger enterprises. JD Edwards World's legacy system offers modest pricing that aligns with its features. Early pricing negotiations can aid in managing costs and maximizing ROI for both solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards World Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards World

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in ERP

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (21st), Customer Experience Management (7th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (11th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (3rd), Local Government CRM (6th), IT Asset Management (10th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th), License Management (3rd)

JD Edwards World

Ranking in ERP

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 2.4%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards World is 0.9%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Ramandeep Walia

Delivery Lead - IT Finance at Cargill

A good legacy solution that is reliable and has good support

We haven't done any implementation in the last ten years. That said, we did upgrade it in 2017-16 to the latest version and it was quite okay. It was complex yet not too much. I'd rate it three and a half out of five in terms of ease of setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"Feature-wise, I like the way it provides inventory details...It is a stable solution."

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products. This makes the UI a little bit easier to understand."

"The product is quite flexible."

"We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do."

"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."

"Having a young talented programmer, during the six years of use, we were able to save around 75 000 EUR preparing simple modifications using customization rather than ordering them in IFS / Partner."

"The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"Collecting data in standard formats for processing in a data warehouse."

"The solution's UI is user friendly and has good performance and good search facility."

"JD Edwards World supports operations in manufacturing and distribution, which are crucial for our organization."

"It has worked fine for many years."

"The ease of use is consistently there."

"In my use cases, JD Edwards World offers flexibility in listing capabilities."

"Overall, its flexibility and technological capabilities make it very valuable for my customers."

"I like that JD Edwards World is perfect for my use cases, but what I like best about it is its navigation."

More JD Edwards World pros

Cons

"IFS Applications can improve the reporting capabilities and increase the speed of feedback time in the IFS Applications. This would help with the overall performance of the solution and provide better experiences for customers."

"The CRM was shaky and although this improves in Apps 10, there is room for improvement."

"Sometimes from the sales perspective, clients don't always fully understand how large a task or a project they're getting involved in when they decide, "We're going to switch across to IFS." They could probably do a little bit more, maybe around preparing people for these projects."

"Customization needs to be improved."

"The solution's reporting tools still require improvement."

"IFS Applications is not robust enough to handle high-volume transactions, so it's not suitable for larger enterprises."

"The support provided by IFS Applications has room for improvement. I'm based in Poland, and when my company had an issue, finding people from IFS to give my company the support it needed was difficult."

"There are some stability issues."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"There is no support from Oracle here. We only have third-party support."

"There are a lot of new technologies coming out and JD Edwards World could improve by having better integration with other databases. The integration with the databases and applications should be in real-time, such as with Oracle."

"The integration technology could be stronger at this point."

"The technical support from Oracle needs a lot of improvement. Both the response time and quality of support require enhancement."

"The interfaces need to be more user-friendly. For example, our purchaser had difficulties updating prices as it required updating line by line."

"I have more than 18 years of JDE experience in JDE EnterpriseOne and World versions. I think JDE is good but compared to SAP and Oracle EPS, we can see which area needs to have some improvement for JDE."

"Improvements are needed in transitioning JD Edwards World to a more stable and reliable cloud product, particularly in terms of GDPR and data privacy compliance."

"Having tools that allow for small but fast adaptations of packages is crucial, as needing skilled programmers for every minor report or mask adaptation is a constraint my customers no longer favor."

More JD Edwards World cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions."

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable."

"The price of JD Edwards World is reasonable. Since it is a legacy solution the price has been reduced."

"You have to pay for a license, and the license cost is calculated based on the number of users you have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

What do you like most about JD Edwards World?

The most valuable feature for me is the traceability customization, which allows me to track the movement and history of artifacts in our ecosystem.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JD Edwards World?

The flexibility and ability to integrate external applications are increasingly vital. For instance, integrating Salesforce with JD Edwards or SAP ERP provides significant power. The ERP system sho...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JD Edwards World?

I have two different kinds of customers. One produces mass market goods like toilet paper and similar products. The other operates in the food environment, producing food packages for retailers. Bo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 12% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs JD Edwards World

Compared 67% of the time

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards World

Compared 20% of the time

Pronto Xi vs JD Edwards World

Compared 13% of the time

More JD Edwards World Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

April 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards World

April 2025

Download JD Edwards World product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

No data available

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

Oracle's JD Edwards World single platform solution enables better collaboration both within and outside your business network. Get all of your lines of business working together sharing information, boosting performance, trimming costs, and driving profitable growth. ERP Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

SICIM S.p.A., Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A, Atrium European Real Estate, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Calumet Specialty Partners, LP Products, Grupo Arcor, Original BUFF S.A., Shelf Drilling Ltd., African + Eastern, Westfield Group LLC, Sportmaster Ltd., Beijing Xinladao Restaurant Group

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards World

April 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards World

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards World and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards World report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.