Infor LX vs QAD Cloud ERP comparison

Infor and QAD are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while QAD is ranked #24 with an average rating of 5.0. Infor holds a 1.5% mindshare in ERP, compared to QAD’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of QAD users who would recommend it.

Infor LX

Read 7 Infor LX reviews

1,016 Views
809 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QAD Cloud ERP

Read 2 QAD Cloud ERP reviews

403 Views
300 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Infor LX

QAD Cloud ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Infor LX and QAD Cloud ERP are competing ERP solutions in the enterprise resource planning sector. While Infor LX offers customization and pricing flexibility, QAD Cloud ERP is generally preferred for its advanced features and cloud framework.

Features: Infor LX provides strong manufacturing capabilities, customization options, and is tailored for specific industry demands. QAD Cloud ERP offers robust supply chain management, advanced analytics, and integrated AI tools, distinguishing itself from Infor LX.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor LX is typically on-premise with detailed setup guidance, but may require more time for implementation. QAD Cloud ERP favors a SaaS model, enabling faster deployment with excellent customer service and seamless updates due to its cloud-first approach.

Pricing and ROI: Infor LX is attractive for its lower setup costs, offering a balanced ROI through reduced initial investment. QAD Cloud ERP might involve higher setup costs but provides a higher ROI potential through operational efficiency and comprehensive features, ensuring long-term value aligned with enterprise growth.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. QAD Cloud ERP

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LX

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QAD Cloud ERP

Ranking in ERP

24th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LX is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QAD Cloud ERP is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Eugenio Santos

IT and processes re-engineering manager at DEUTZ AG

Program adapts to our requirements and handles our operations effectively

The interface we use currently needs enhancement, as I am still using the outdated green screens. I would benefit for us to adpot the latest INFOR user interface, which is a more integrated interface. Additionally, improvements in warehouse handling with handheld terminal, quality management in warehouses, and managing a dual sourcing strategy would be beneficial. I have had to build my own applications for some features that are lacking, and aligning all components for uncertainty management in the market is necessary.

Read full review

Nicola Degliesposti

Information Technology Business Analyst at Caterpillar Inc.

The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market

The product lacks a lot of features and technology. It is really limited. The tool must improve in almost all areas. There are a lot of things that should be improved in the manufacturing and shop floor, logistics and warehousing, and master data both from a functionality and technology standpoint. The solution must have a better WMS to improve the logistics and workflow and handle the processes within the system. The collaboration must be improved. The product must be more flexible and allow customization. It must allow the users to personalize the application in a better way. The tool lacks a lot in the purchasing area. The documents and process of purchasing are limited and simple. In the sales domain, there are no enhancements to calculate forecast and shipment programs. We cannot optimize transportation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

"Infor LX is effective for planning, manufacturing, and distribution processes."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

"Infor LX has improved my customers' manufacturing processes by creating a standard in the process, which improves performance in manufacturing as well as finance, distribution, and supply chain."

"Infor LX's most valuable feature is that it's very interactive."

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

"I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."

More Infor LX pros

"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."

"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."

Cons

"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved."

"Infor needs more APIs, as in the current version, APIs are not fully developed."

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens. I would benefit from a more integrated interface."

"It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time."

"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens."

More Infor LX cons

"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."

"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."

"Pricing is variable due to different deals and discounts, typically starting at around $2000 US dollars for one license."

"Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Educational Organization

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor LX?

One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor LX?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LX?

I use Infor LX for the manufacturing business at our plant. I mainly use it for operations such as purchasing, engineering master data, shop floor, inventory, and customer orders. It is important t...

See all answers

What do you like most about QAD Cloud ERP?

It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QAD Cloud ERP?

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QAD Cloud ERP?

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor LX

Compared 57% of the time

SAP ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 25% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor LX

Compared 11% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor LX

Compared 8% of the time

More Infor LX Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 31% of the time

IFS Cloud Platform vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 27% of the time

Epicor ERP vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 26% of the time

SAP ERP vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 16% of the time

More QAD Cloud ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX

April 2025

Download Infor LX product report

Buyer's Guide

ERP

April 2025

Download QAD Cloud ERP product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LX, ERP LX

MFG/PRO

Overview

Infor LX is a comprehensive process manufacturing system that covers various manufacturing methods, including made to stock, made to order, configure to order, assemble to order, batch, repetitive, flow, and Lean manufacturing. A wide range of industries—including consumer packaged goods, food and beverage, life sciences, medical devices, chemicals, automotive, and general manufacturing—trust Infor LX to improve performance and profit margins at a lower total cost than comparable solutions.

Infor

QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

QAD

Sample Customers

Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko

Tower International, Kendra Scott

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. QAD Cloud ERP

April 2025

Free Report: Infor LX vs. QAD Cloud ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. QAD Cloud ERP and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LX vs. QAD Cloud ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.