No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management) vs OneLogin by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Intercede MyID PSM (Passwor...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Password Managers (35th)
OneLogin by One Identity
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management) and OneLogin by One Identity aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management) is designed for Enterprise Password Managers and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
OneLogin by One Identity, on the other hand, focuses on Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS), holds 3.2% mindshare, up 1.8% since last year.
Enterprise Password Managers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Intercede MyID PSM (Password Security Management)0.7%
Azure Key Vault12.9%
AWS Secrets Manager12.2%
Other74.2%
Enterprise Password Managers
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OneLogin by One Identity3.2%
Microsoft Entra ID16.3%
Google Cloud Identity10.8%
Other69.7%
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Robin Schechinger - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Owner at Telekom Deutschland GmbH
A tool to encrypt and decrypt emails that can also be useful for general access management
I rate the initial setup process of Intercede MyID an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. The solution was deployed throughout the whole organization, meaning the solution was rolled out in my company, and that's it. The solution was deployed in a couple of days. Two people were required for the solution's deployment and maintenance phases.
Amit Rathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited
Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle
The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the access management."
"The feature for signing documents is important to me."
"OneLogin has impacted my organization positively by reducing costs as well as increasing efficiency."
"The single sign-on and the fact that we can integrate everything in one place and control from there were valuable features of this solution."
"The single sign-on feature of OneLogin is the most valuable and useful for me, as it allows one-click access to all apps, eliminating password juggling and frustration while providing centralized access control."
"OneLogin is efficient."
"OneLogin provides a seamless end-user experience, and we are receiving very good and positive responses from end-users."
"OneLogin has positively impacted the organization mainly by saving time for the IT team, as everything is enabled through MFA and single sign-on with all applications, which saves considerable time and enhances security."
"OneLogin by One Identity has positively impacted my organization by cutting implementation time by fifty to eighty percent and decreasing the workforce required to implement it by fifty percent."
"The solution's ability to save and manage of all my passwords is great."
 

Cons

"Reporting features would be a good addition to Intercede MyID, as it is one of the areas where the solution lacks."
"I'm not sure whether the solution has a mobile version or mobile dashboard, but that would be nice."
"The debugging feature is a bit problematic."
"I think OneLogin could improve by providing more features that make everything more unified."
"OneLogin could be improved with more flexible reporting and analytic options, especially for detailed access monitoring and compliance tracking."
"Overall, the experience with OneLogin by One Identity has been very good, but I feel there are some improvements that can be made, particularly regarding how the integrations happen and providing more support to some of the niche applications."
"I would like better reporting from SmartFactor Authentication when a user is not able to sign in due to a new location, new IP, new device, et cetera."
"OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process."
"There are a couple of areas for improvement in OneLogin. While it is strong overall, the key areas that could be worked on include the ease of configuration for advanced workflows, as setting up complex role-based policies or integration across different systems in the HealthTech market requires considerable technical effort."
"One area for improvement would be providing more granular reporting and analytics along with an even more intuitive administration interface for managing large-scale deployments."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."
"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."
"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."
"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."
"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."
"The price of the licensing is fine."
"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."
"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business140
Midsize Enterprise41
Large Enterprise73
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?
One area for improvement for OneLogin by One Identity is the integration complexity; having clearer documentation, practical integration examples, and an easier configuration workflow would enable ...
What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?
My main use case for OneLogin by One Identity is for identity and access management, which establishes clear rules for authentication. A specific example of how I use OneLogin by One Identity for a...
What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?
My advice for others considering OneLogin by One Identity is that it is a good choice, with reasonable pricing around three dollars, which translates to around three hundred Indian currency. The es...
 

Also Known As

MyID
OneLogin Workforce Identity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wells Fargo, Boeing, Airbus, United Health Group, U.S. Social Security Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kuwait Government
OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Idira by Palo Alto Networks and others in Enterprise Password Managers. Updated: October 2026.
921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.