JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs SAP S/4HANA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in ERP
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Activity Based Costing Software (3rd), Production Planning (2nd), Demand Management (1st)
SAP S/4HANA
Ranking in ERP
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the ERP category, the market share of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.9% and it decreased by 3.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of SAP S/4HANA is 15.1% and it decreased by 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP
Unique Categories:
Activity Based Costing Software
11.5%
Production Planning
6.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PV
Sep 27, 2021
Scalable and reliable, but implementation could be easier
We use JD Edwards EnterpriseOne as a standard financial ERP package but we mainly for finance and accounting reporting I have been using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for six months. The solution was stable. We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. We had a…
Madhava Pemmaraju - PeerSpot reviewer
May 22, 2024
Helps us provide customers with better visibility, forecasting, and smart data for decision-making, but the pricing should be more flexible
We've integrated SAP S/4HANA into our implementation projects for customers, not internally. We use SAP S/4HANA for real-time analytics and decision-making.  It helps us provide customers with better visibility, forecasting, and smart data for decision-making. This streamlines our business…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"There are numerous good features."
"Because I'm a procure-to-pay consultant, I mostly look at that angle, and I have a bit of experience with sales and distribution. I also like the integration between S/4HANA and other ERPs because S/4HANA is a suite. For example, the integration between S/4HANA and EWM Transportation Management, and Ariba."
"The solution provides real-time compliance and auditing"
"Provides multiple tools for easy integrations"
"I find the Production Planning Cockpit (PPC) and Material Requirements Planning (MRP) most valuable modules."
"It seamlessly integrates with all the SAP Business Suite products such as IoT, AI, Analytics and all other SaaS solutions. The product is very robust and comprehensive."
"SAP S/4HANA is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"S4HANA is a completely integrated solution. It's an end-to-end ERP system with strong manufacturing and financial integration, which is not common among ERPs. And it's a solution that's driven by industry best practices."
"Provides SAP Fiori apps with numerous dashboards and KPIs"
 

Cons

"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"Maybe its user interface and reporting can be improved across the board, but it is manageable."
"This product would be improved by adding more reports."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"Technical support has been declining. They aren't as responsive as they used to be."
"The scalability could be better."
"The solution’s pricing could be reduced."
"The product could be improved in several key areas, particularly in API granularity and ease of configuration."
"The install can be difficult. There's something called secondary sales solutions that is not there in SAP. We need to have third-party tools to integrate to do the automatization. The two parts are missing on the secondary sales solution and automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."
"In terms of price, it is not on the high end."
"In terms of pricing, we have a lot of problems because companies here don't have enough resources to acquire the product. So we need to evaluate the price according to our demographic...The license cost is around 1,00,000 euros."
"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."
"There is an annual license for this solution."
"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."
"The solution is really expensive."
"The solution's pricing depends on the deal and the number of users."
"The licensing format is complicated for SAP S/4HANA"
"Licensing costs are not transparent"
"Depending on the solution there can be a different way of doing the license. Most of the licenses are annual, but there are some models where it is that offer pay-as-you-go. Additionally, there are some solutions that offer monthly per user."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The solution is expensive."
"It is very expensive. It is not cheap."
"Licensing works on a subscription model for the cloud version and it's a one-time fee for the on-premises version."
"The pricing is a five out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Educational Organization
35%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
The solution’s pricing depends on the module you’re purchasing.
Are there any advantages of SAP S4 HANA over SAP Business One (SAP B1) apart from the cost?
SaP Business One is a complete solution for business management. The software applications are broad, ranging from accounting to project management and human resources. It is very versatile and com...
What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA?
The solution’s pricing could be reduced.
What is your primary use case for SAP S4HANA?
Many companies are currently going for SAP S/4HANA because the maintenance for their SAP ERP or SAP ECC will be over the next year. Even their extended maintenance will be over by 2028. Some compan...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP S4HANA
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
Nestle, O.C. Tanner, Sabre, New York Life Insurance Co., MEMEBOX, Siemens AG.
Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP S/4HANA and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.