KACE Desktop Authority [EOL] vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Quest Software and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Client Desktop Management category. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

KACE Desktop Authority [EOL]

Read 1 KACE Desktop Authority [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Read 69 ManageEngine Endpoint Central reviews

8,546 Views
684 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

KACE Desktop Authority [EOL]

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

ManageEngine Endpoint Central and KACE Desktop Authority EOL compete in IT management, focusing on endpoint management. ManageEngine tends to have an edge in pricing and support, while KACE Desktop Authority EOL is known for its robust feature set.

Features: ManageEngine Endpoint Central includes comprehensive endpoint management capabilities like patch management, remote control, and asset management. KACE Desktop Authority EOL is noted for desktop configuration management and security settings, providing a feature-rich environment for desktop control.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Endpoint Central offers cloud-based and on-premises deployments, providing flexibility. Its customer service is responsive, aiding in smoother implementation. KACE Desktop Authority EOL, primarily on-premises, requires more involved setup, experiencing mixed service feedback. Endpoint Central's dual deployment model and supportive service offer an advantage here.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Endpoint Central is known for competitive pricing with a strong ROI, facilitated by efficient resource management. KACE Desktop Authority EOL may incur higher initial costs, but its extensive feature range can justify the investment for businesses seeking advanced desktop management. Endpoint Central's economical pricing model and quick returns appeal to businesses aiming to manage costs effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Client Desktop Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Client Desktop Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,473 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KACE Desktop Authority [EOL]

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Client Desktop Management (1st), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (6th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (2nd)

Featured Reviews

it_user1762365

IT Manager at ABLE STEEL FABRICATORS

Saves me time and effort when adding and subtracting drives, and Premier Support handles updates

Desktop Authority is nice for us because we can pass out all of our drive mappings and our printers, throughout the office and the shop. Our environment is a very big place because we're a steel fabricator. We don't fabricate steel racks for your kitchen. We're fabricating steel buildings and beams for highrises. We're sitting on a few acres of property, so it's nice to be able to deploy and fix things without always having to walk everywhere or physically go to a machine to map a drive. It's easier to use than doing it in Windows Active Directory, which I never have loved at all. One of the benefits is time savings. If we make a change to a job and I want to pull a drive off of a set of computers, I can do it without having to leave my desk. Before we started using the solution, I would have had to go to every machine. That was a much more cumbersome way of handling it. That is one way it does save me time, probably a few hours every month. I don't have to mess around with something that I can do by opening up Desktop Authority. I can make a few changes, apply those changes, and I'm done in a matter of a few minutes. In the old days, I would have had to go outside, to every machine and every computer. We have jobs that run anywhere from two months to two years. We did a lot of steel for the Rams' stadium, SoFi Stadium in California. That job is still going and it's four years in. But at some point, we're going to want to shut that job down, and we'll shut that particular drive off of the network. And that's the advantage. I can individually go in and say, "Okay, we're done fabricating steel for this job. The shop doesn't need to see this information anymore," and I can pull it away from them really easily with this software. That's one of the things that is a huge benefit for me. That's where it's saving me time.

Read full review

reviewer1908987

Ict Manager at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Centralized endpoint management has improved patching, software deployment, and asset control

ManageEngine Endpoint Central is what I am personally working with and using, along with the Service Desk, which is another tool we use. We have been working with ManageEngine Endpoint Central for four years or more. The customizable packages in software deployment are very positive; you can apply different policies for the package that you are going to deploy. This is something we are still using and working with. ManageEngine has a very large portfolio of products. There is some functionality that is not managed from ManageEngine Endpoint Central, but you can find that functionality in another module of ManageEngine's portfolio.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For what I use the solution for, it works really well."

"If we make a change to a job and I want to pull a drive off of a set of computers, I can do it without having to leave my desk. Before we started using the solution, I would have had to go to every machine. That was a much more cumbersome way of handling it."

"It is a very stable solution, there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"The solution is stable."

"The dashboard has been very useful."

"The ROI was three months for us."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend ManageEngine Endpoint Central to others if it fits their budget and technical requirements, as it is one of the best tools available in comparison to its peers in the market."

"We've looked at a lot of solutions and, value for money, this product can't be beat."

"Desktop Central is easy to deploy, manage, and integrate with other ManageEngine products."

"ManageEngine Endpoint Central has significantly simplified my device management practices."

More ManageEngine Endpoint Central pros

Cons

"It would be nice if it were a little easier to maneuver around the patch management. I would like to use that more, but it got very cumbersome and complicated when I tried to use it in the past. I haven't used that much since then."

"The ability to backup and restore or move user profiles to another PC would be a fantastic addition to the feature set."

"We are looking for a complete solution for patch management with central management and the cloud which ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not provide."

"At one time, they delivered an agent that ate up your CPU and your memory."

"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great."

"The support could be faster."

"The team should work on improving the stability, particularly with massive patches deployment, clients are not 100% getting patches and the information provided by the system does not help; more detailed report would be very useful."

"I really feel like asset explorer should be a component of desktop central."

"The pricing could be a bit better."

More ManageEngine Endpoint Central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cost was a big factor when we made the decision to go with it. It wasn't very expensive, and it's not even very expensive now. I pay less than $500 a year for it."

"The licensing is very easy to understand and pricing is right for what you get."

"The price is moderate."

"We pay about $250 a year for our license."

"Compared to other products, ManageEngine Endpoint Central is a very cheap solution."

"Choose wisely between the Professional and Enterprise editions, based on your needs."

"The initial purchase was around $6,000 or $7,000. We most probably are not on an annual subscription. We bought it, and then we pay for the maintenance. I'm not 100% sure how that's working out."

"Affordable for any customer."

"The product is cheap."

More ManageEngine Endpoint Central pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Client Desktop Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Endpoint Central?

I would rate the pricing as seven; it is quite expensive from my point of view for ManageEngine Endpoint Central.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Endpoint Central?

It would be great to see some additional options within ManageEngine Endpoint Central. A better monitoring tool to analyze network traffic related to patch management would be something good to see...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Intune vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Compared 4% of the time

Jamf Pro vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Client Desktop Management

August 2026

Download KACE Desktop Authority [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

August 2026

Download ManageEngine Endpoint Central product report

Also Known As

No data available

ManageEngine Desktop Central, Desktop Central, ManageEngine Desktop Management MSP

Overview

KACE Desktop Authority [EOL] was a trusted endpoint management tool that allowed IT administrators to optimize, manage, and secure networked Windows endpoints efficiently and effectively through automation and policy-based controls.

The effectiveness of KACE Desktop Authority [EOL] centered on its ability to streamline the management of Windows endpoints via centralized control. This tool helped reduce complexity in managing devices by automating tasks such as software deployment, security patching, and configuration management. Its support for group policy initiation and network auditing made it a favorite in many IT departments. Its easy integration with existing network infrastructure further enhanced its utility for IT professionals.

What are the key features of KACE Desktop Authority [EOL]?

Software Deployment: Automates installation and updates, saving admin time.
Security Management: Provides layered protection through centralized security controls.
Configuration Management: Simplifies policy application for consistent endpoint settings.
Asset Inventory: Offers comprehensive device tracking and reporting capability.
Patch Management: Streamlines the updating process to keep systems secure and compliant.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks through automation and policy enforcement.
Cost Savings: Minimizes labor and downtime through effective resource allocation.
Improved Security: Enhances endpoint security with proactive management features.
Scalability: Accommodates growing networks with ease of deployment and operation.

In industries with extensive IT infrastructures, such as finance and healthcare, KACE Desktop Authority [EOL] was implemented to maintain compliance, ensure security, and improve IT efficiency. Its deployment enabled these industries to meet rigorous standards and respond to technological changes swiftly.

Quest Software

ManageEngine Endpoint Central focuses on patch management, remote control, and asset management. It offers centralized management to facilitate software deployment and mobile device administration across various operating systems, consolidating functionalities for improved usability and streamlined processes.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central integrates multiple capabilities like remote troubleshooting and cross-platform updates, supporting Windows, Linux, and macOS. Its seamless integration with ManageEngine tools enhances usability while users appreciate its remote access, configuration management, and reporting instruments. The intuitive interface promotes easy training and adaptation in different environments. Though welcomed for its capabilities, users suggest improvements in software QA, interface intuitiveness, and customizable reporting. Desires also include better Linux patch management, quicker deployment times, enhanced security, and simpler support channels. Managing macOS effectively and comparing its management with Windows shows some disparity.

What are the most essential features?

Patch Management: Efficient patching for OS and applications, ensuring system security.
Remote Control: Easy access and support for troubleshooting and maintenance.
Asset Management: Comprehensive tracking and management of IT assets.
Software Deployment: Streamlined deployment across diverse platforms.
Cross-platform Updates: Simplifies updates across Windows, Linux, and macOS.

What should be considered for ROI and benefits?

Improved Efficiency: Speeds up troubleshooting and maintenance tasks.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces labor costs with centralized management.
Scalability: Adapts as organizational needs grow and change.
Security Enhancement: Ensures robust protection against threats.
Integration: Works seamlessly with existing ManageEngine tools.

ManageEngine Endpoint Central finds application across diverse sectors, particularly for IT operations that require managing patches, software deployment, and asset oversight. It supports IT teams in maintaining compliance and security policies. By easing software deployment and enabling effective remote troubleshooting, it enhances IT support workflows without impacting productivity.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Elevion

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Strathallan School, BMI Healthcare, Comercial Kywi, First Priority Federal Credit Union, Gerab National Enterprises

Buyer's Guide

Client Desktop Management

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine, Quest Software, Broadcom and others in Client Desktop Management. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Client Desktop Management vendors.

We monitor all Client Desktop Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.