We performed a comparison between Kaseya IT Center and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's technical support is good."
"It is a product that is very easy to learn."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability."
"There is a faster time to rollout. If we get a new PC, it can be ready for productivity right away."
"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is valuable in keeping our systems updated. We are able to send updates to all the systems. Additionally, the Intune integration is helpful."
"We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."
"It's helped us solve problems surrounding patching, installing, and reporting different patches, etc., on the virtual machines."
"One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined process has significantly improved our software distribution workflows."
"At times, there is degradation in performance."
"In Kaseya, agents are shown as offline at times, and it is an area that is being improved."
"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."
"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."
"I'm looking for a single solution for all discovery needs. It fulfills about 40% of the requirements, and I'd like to see the other 60% so that I don't have to keep doing this."
"I would like to see more automation."
"I would like to see an agentless version of the solution."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"The App to upgrades to the server needs to be improved."
"One area of improvement is regarding the patching of Office 365 products. We have some difficulties on this side, and it can be improved."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaseya IT Center is ranked 21st in Server Monitoring with 3 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. Kaseya IT Center is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kaseya IT Center writes "A tool that helps a user speed up the process of installation and automate certain processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Kaseya IT Center is most compared with Tanium, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Microsoft Intune and Tanium. See our Kaseya IT Center vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.