


Microsoft Defender XDR and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response compete in the cybersecurity space. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior threat detection capabilities, although Microsoft Defender XDR is preferred for its seamless integration with Microsoft environments.
Features: Microsoft Defender XDR offers robust threat intelligence, integration with Microsoft services, and automated incident response. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides advanced threat hunting, rich endpoint telemetry, and extensive forensics.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender XDR users suggest improvements in customization options, more detailed reporting, and enhanced flexibility. Kaspersky users highlight the need for better integration with third-party services, a more intuitive process for setting up rules and policies, and expanded compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender XDR is noted for its straightforward deployment within Microsoft ecosystems and responsive customer support. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has a more complex deployment process but provides comprehensive support once operational.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender XDR is often found to be more cost-effective, appealing to budget-conscious users. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response tends to be more expensive but is viewed as a worthwhile investment due to its extensive features and higher satisfaction with its ROI.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
We can quarantine and isolate a device within minutes.
Microsoft Defender XDR has saved me at least 50% of my time.
It helped stop multiple intrusion points where we would have had millions in lost revenue if the attackers got in.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
You get stuck in low-level support for way longer than you should, instead of them escalating the issue up the chain.
It's critical to escalate SEV B issues immediately to a domestic engineer.
Once issues are escalated to the second or third layer, the support is much better.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
My concern is about the scale of events and alerts being generated, and the product is doing a very good job of only surfacing the important items for us.
Microsoft Defender XDR shows tremendous scalability, much more so than on-premises solutions.
Microsoft Defender XDR scales pretty well.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
The service has remained consistently online, with any issues isolated to specific components, suggesting a well-designed and modular architecture.
The services within our ecosystem have been reliable, meeting their SLAs.
It provides high-fidelity signals.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
The licensing process needs improvement and clarification.
Improvements are needed in automated response capabilities.
Some inconsistencies exist between blades, which could be improved for a more seamless user and UI experience.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
There are certainly savings when using Microsoft Defender XDR, which can range from 30%, 40%, and even up to 50%.
I would rate the pricing as eight out of ten, indicating it is a reasonable cost for the product.
Microsoft purposefully obfuscates this through marketing ploys to hide costs.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The main network is being monitored through the firewall at that level.
With Microsoft threat intelligence information, it detects various types of threats, including insider attacks, malicious content, and data exfiltration.
This allows us to secure our systems in advance and proactively improve security, rather than waiting for incidents to occur.
Once we have it on the security dashboard, we can see a real-time storyline.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Microsoft Defender XDR | 2.6% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response | 1.1% |
| Other | 92.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 26 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides robust malware detection, endpoint security, integration with SIEM, control of USB devices, and behavior analysis, deployed on servers, mobile devices, and laptops.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids organizations in scanning environments, blocking sites, handling data transfers, and offering visibility into quarantine systems. Utilizing features such as encryption, machine learning analysis, caching, and automation, Kaspersky ensures enhanced security. The unified agent incorporates antivirus and EDR functionalities, centralizes management, and provides sandbox analysis alongside early-stage threat detection. Automated response capabilities improve efficiency, and the tool's lightweight nature maintains device performance despite high detection rates and advanced threat prevention mechanisms.
What are some of the key features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response can be implemented to protect sensitive data and critical systems against advanced threats. Financial institutions may leverage its high detection rates and behavior analysis to secure transactions and customer information. Healthcare organizations can utilize its sandbox analysis and early-stage threat detection to protect patient data. Retail businesses benefit from the enhanced security and efficient automated responses, ensuring customer data remains safe during transactions.
Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.
It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.
Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.
Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.