Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
Tanium and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are both strong contenders in the endpoint detection and response market. Based on user reviews, Tanium seems to have an edge in performance and customer support, while Kaspersky is favored for its robust features and better value proposition.
Features: Tanium is praised for its real-time data collection, comprehensive endpoint visibility, and efficient incident response capabilities. Kaspersky users highlight its advanced threat detection, ease of use, and automation features. However, Kaspersky is noted to offer more extensive threat intelligence and seamless integration with other security tools, making it a preferred choice for the feature set.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Tanium could improve in areas such as reducing complexity and enhancing training resources. Kaspersky users indicate a need for better customization options and lower system resource usage. Kaspersky appears to have fewer areas needing improvement compared to Tanium.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tanium offers flexible deployment options but requires significant expertise, with users noting strong customer support. Kaspersky has a straightforward deployment process and efficient customer service, making it accessible for organizations with varying IT skill levels. Kaspersky's ease of deployment and supportive customer service make it more favorable in this category.
Pricing and ROI: Tanium's setup cost is considered high, but many users find the return on investment justifiable due to its performance benefits. In contrast, Kaspersky offers competitive pricing with strong ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Users generally perceive Kaspersky as providing better overall value for money compared to Tanium.
