Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
8th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (2nd)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
24th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 3.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Karim Mostafa - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases
I primarily use this solution for security.  I appreciate the good control it offers, which simplifies management. So, I feel confident using this solution. We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system. I have been using Kaspersky for eight years. I use the latest version.  I…
Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has helped our company protect the confidential data of our customers."
"Ability to specify the level of protection on devices,"
"In EDR, they have a sandbox feature. Kaspersky's threat detection and response capability is very good, making it a strong feature."
"It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture."
"The admin capabilities are great."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good."
"It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine."
"The product is quite scalable."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"The platform's most valuable features are AI capabilities and its quick updates."
"The extendability is great."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."
 

Cons

"The installation is technical. You need to be certified."
"The solution could be more secure. It's an aspect the company needs to be mindful of."
"Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection."
"The cloud needs to be more robust. We have 1,500 users and Kaspersky has issues handling them. It's a problem."
"The product must improve its price to suit small and mid-size enterprises."
"The admin console must be a little bit easier."
"Maybe the solution's monitoring could be improved with more dashboards, so there's no back and forth, back and forth."
"It would be beneficial to have more robust cloud management capabilities for Endpoint."
"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."
"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."
"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."
"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."
"The solution can be expensive."
"We'd like better UI on the management screen."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
"Continued available training is important for people coming in to use it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"The solution is available at a highly affordable price"
"The tool is expensive."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution."
"The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years."
"Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical."
"The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates."
"I don't remember exactly what the licenses cost, but it's not too expensive. It's affordable, especially when you are dealing with on-prem. However, I don't know about the new prices because we are in the process of buying support."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
61%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
I have some PCs with one gigabyte of RAM, and it's not easy to set up Kaspersky on these. Additionally, I want to improve how viruses are isolated and receive better notifications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
The pricing of Kaspersky is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten. Our current licensing costs are one hundred dollars per user for three hundred users, which was established three years ago.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.