Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
8th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (2nd)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
23rd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 3.7%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Karim Mostafa - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases
I primarily use this solution for security.  I appreciate the good control it offers, which simplifies management. So, I feel confident using this solution. We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system. I have been using Kaspersky for eight years. I use the latest version.  I…
Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good."
"We found the installation to be very straightforward and the deployment process to be very fast."
"As far as it functions, it works fine."
"We use the solution for endpoint protection, virus detection, and centralized administration."
"It has improved our performance and deployment."
"The tool's interface is good."
"Kaspersky protects our company from ransomware attacks. We have multiple sites across the country, including the principal headquarters and different towns. We can see any viruses that are in the network and take action."
"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."
"Technical support is excellent."
"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."
"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
 

Cons

"This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced."
"I would like the solution to be able to allow to have end to end security services from the final user to the server."
"It would be preferable if the product were more proactive and more modern in its approach to security and protection."
"The support must provide quick responses."
"The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky."
"We are having some troubles because some American companies we work with don't want to work with Kaspersky."
"They're restricted to endpoint protection for now, I'd like to see some additional products."
"The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."
"The solution can be expensive."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is too expensive compared to other products."
"The licensing is affordable. We bought a three-year license. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard license fees."
"We have an annual license and there is a fee per device used. The price is fair compared to the latest EDR solution."
"I received a very good deal with Kaspersky."
"The solution is available at a highly affordable price"
"The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products."
"It is a cost-effective product."
"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
I have some PCs with one gigabyte of RAM, and it's not easy to set up Kaspersky on these. Additionally, I want to improve how viruses are isolated and receive better notifications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
The pricing of Kaspersky is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten. Our current licensing costs are one hundred dollars per user for three hundred users, which was established three years ago.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.