Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (2nd)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
22nd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Karim Mostafa - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2023
Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases
I primarily use this solution for security.  I appreciate the good control it offers, which simplifies management. So, I feel confident using this solution. We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system. I have been using Kaspersky for eight years. I use the latest version.  I…
Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has improved our performance and deployment."
"Overall, the product is quite flexible."
"The solution provides protection for all our systems, file servers, endpoints and domain controllers."
"The malware threat detection has been excellent overall."
"I like that Kaspersky isn't heavy."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides total security, everything in one."
"The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics."
"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
"The technical support services are good."
"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
 

Cons

"There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have a built-in DLP (data loss prevention) solution."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"I would like to see the inclusion of support for device management and device control."
"I would like to see integration to many different systems easier."
"It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features."
"This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced."
"It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
"Search feature could be made more user-friendly."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
"I would like to see more automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution requires a license and there are different license packages depending on the number of users you need."
"I find the solution to be inexpensive compared to other solution like Crowdstrike."
"For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD)."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is an expensive solution."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business' pricing is reasonable, and licensing costs are annual."
"The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents."
"There is a license required for this solution and we have 1,800 licenses. The cost is a bit high and we are looking for an alternative."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The product pricing is high."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."
"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
60%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
Kaspersky used to have a feature for data recovery or data backup. Initially, their documentation mentioned this capability, allowing users to recover or back up their data within their systems. Ho...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
Pricing is very reasonable for a small companies. It cost around 64 dollars.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.