Klocwork and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are both in the software security category. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive scanning capabilities, despite its higher price point.
Features: Klocwork is recognized for its efficient static code analysis, early defect detection, and integration simplicity. Tenable.io is valued for its comprehensive vulnerability scanning, continuous monitoring features, and enhanced web application security.
Room for Improvement: Klocwork users mention the need for a modern interface, improved reporting tools, and usability enhancements. Tenable.io users desire clearer documentation, smoother integration with other security tools, and better user support during setup and use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is known for straightforward deployment and a responsive support team. Tenable.io offers more extensive capabilities, challenges during installation, and longer deployment times but provides more deployment support once integrated.
Pricing and ROI: Klocwork is viewed as budget-friendly with quicker ROI due to its focus on code quality improvement. Tenable.io requires a larger initial investment, delivering long-term ROI through enhanced security, making the extra cost justifiable for comprehensive security needs.
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.