OpenText UFT One and LEAPWORK compete in automated testing. LEAPWORK appears to have the upper hand with its intuitive design and powerful capabilities, despite a higher cost.
Features: OpenText UFT One provides broad compatibility, integration with numerous platforms, and a comprehensive test automation solution. LEAPWORK offers a no-code platform, simplifies test creation, and provides accessibility for non-technical teams. LEAPWORK's inclusive design enhances user-friendliness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One may be complex to deploy, but it benefits from strong support services to address challenges. LEAPWORK offers quicker deployment with a simpler setup process and responsive customer service, providing an advantage.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One usually has a lower initial setup cost with moderate ROI, suitable for larger enterprises with extensive testing needs. LEAPWORK requires a higher initial investment but yields a strong ROI due to its efficiency and time-saving features, offering better long-term value.
LEAPWORK is a no-code automation platform. This solution’s main purpose is to make it easy for business and IT administrators to automate repetitive processes.
LEAPWORK Features
LEAPWORK has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
LEAPWORK Benefits
Some of the benefits of using LEAPWORK include:
Reviews from Real Users
PeerSpot user Timothy C., Founder and Chief Technologist at Spider Technologies, says, “It provides automated testing. Instead of us doing manual testing, we can utilize LEAPWORK, and it tests most of our critical processes. In the next phase, we also plan to do some process work with it, such as using Leapwork to create reports or provide certain extracts of data.”
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.