Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Zabbix comparison

Lenovo XClarity Controller

Read 103 Zabbix reviews

9,886 Views
7,536 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Zabbix and Lenovo XClarity Controller are two prominent solutions in the IT monitoring and management space. Lenovo XClarity Controller stands out for its ease of use and streamlined deployment process.

Features: Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including network, server, cloud, and applications. Lenovo XClarity Controller provides hardware management features and an intuitive control panel. Zabbix enables greater customization, while Lenovo XClarity Controller focuses on simplification and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix setup complexity and steep learning curve are noted. Enhancements in integration capabilities with third-party tools are suggested for Lenovo XClarity Controller. Both products need more user-friendly documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix deployment is time-consuming and needs skilled administrators. Lenovo XClarity Controller has a quick and straightforward installation process. Lenovo XClarity Controller's customer service is highly praised, while Zabbix's is rated positively, though not exceptionally.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is cost-effective initially as an open-source solution but may accrue costs through customization and maintenance. Lenovo XClarity Controller has a higher upfront cost but delivers strong ROI through reduced downtime and efficient management.

To learn more, read our detailed Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: October 2024).

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix

Download the complete report

Helped 814,325 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Lenovo XClarity Controller

Ranking in Server Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Server Monitoring

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

103

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (10th), Network Monitoring Software (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Lenovo XClarity Controller is 6.1%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 21.2%, down from 23.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Nishant Ambast

Deputy Manager at Arya Omnitalk Wireless Solutions Private Limited

Jul 11, 2024

Good remote management capability and easy to setup and to manage but slow performance

It's used to manage the OS on the servers, which are Windows Server 2016 and 2019. We also use it for storage, with 3 to 6 TB of space, and for software deployment from our business solutions. We provide servers with our software and configuration to customers, ensuring 24/7 operation We used…

Read full review

ASM Naushad Alam

Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 16, 2022

Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes

Our company is a financial organization and we use the solution to check connectivity, CPU utilization, and hard disk utilization for all of our servers. We monitor networks to learn traffic conditions. We use threshold features to compare servers or routers and find each server's size before it…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Lenovo XClarity is the ease of use because of the interface browser that is highly compatible and it has mobile web management."

"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to provide insights into server status and alerts."

"The remote management capability was also good."

"The solution is open-source, easy to manage, and user-friendly making it easy for anyone to use."

"Health and communication links availability."

"The initial setup was very quick. The first time it was long because I didn't know it yet. I was only using Windows. The first time was very difficult because of the operating system."

"Zabbix is an excellent performance monitoring tool."

"The most valuable feature is the protocol to manage anything."

"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."

"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."

"During my testing, the features that I like the most are that it can be integrated with my system, and it provides me with reports of all of my servers."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"It worked very slowly. It was not well on performance."

"They could enable notifications on emails and phones regarding control panel information."

"Lenovo XClarity can improve the dashboard integration. For example, graphs could be better. Additionally, more integration with other vendors is needed. For example, VMware has integration with a lot of vendors."

"The reports are not great and should be improved."

"The event correlation could be better."

"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."

"I'm using the free version of Zabbix, and I'd like to see more customization options, especially for setting trigger thresholds."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."

"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."

"My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

"I was using the free, Community Edition."

"There are no licenses."

"It is worth every cent to pay or even study to do your own installation."

"Zabbix is open-source so if one wishes to implement it in-house, they must have qualified professionals to set up and optimize databases, Linux/Unix OS, PHP, Apache, and depending on what is monitored, a full-stack network and systems administrator may be needed."

"Zabbix is a free solution but the support contact costs money."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"The solution is open source so is free."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Media Company

Educational Organization

39%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lenovo XClarity Controller?

The product's most valuable feature is its ability to provide insights into server status and alerts.

What needs improvement with Lenovo XClarity Controller?

For the betterment of the server, I'm not sure, but it worked very slowly. It was not well on performance. So, that could be improved. There was no issue or problem with the software. In the beginn...

What is your primary use case for Lenovo XClarity Controller?

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I use the tool's free version.

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

I'm using the free version of Zabbix, and I'd like to see more customization options, especially for setting trigger thresholds.

HPE System Management Homepage vs Lenovo XClarity Controller

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Lenovo XClarity Controller

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei iBMC vs Lenovo XClarity Controller

Compared 3% of the time

More Lenovo XClarity Controller Competitors

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 8% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 7% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 5% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Server Monitoring

Download Lenovo XClarity Controller product report

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

XClarity Controller, Lenovo XCC

No data available

Learn More

Lenovo

Overview

Lenovo ThinkSystem servers contain an integrated service processor, XClarity Controller (XCC), which provides advanced service-processor control, monitoring, and alerting functions. This document summarizes the features of XCC and the upgrades available to ThinkSystem servers.

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix