Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs Zabbix comparison

Lenovo and Zabbix are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Lenovo is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while Zabbix is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Lenovo holds a 6.2% mindshare in SM, compared to Zabbix’s 21.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lenovo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.
Lenovo XClarity Controller
Read 3 Lenovo XClarity Controller reviews
  • 1,370 Views
  • 1,158 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Zabbix
Read 103 Zabbix reviews
  • 9,587 Views
  • 7,310 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Zabbix and Lenovo XClarity Controller are two prominent solutions in the IT monitoring and management space. Lenovo XClarity Controller stands out for its ease of use and streamlined deployment process.

Features: Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including network, server, cloud, and applications. Lenovo XClarity Controller provides hardware management features and an intuitive control panel. Zabbix enables greater customization, while Lenovo XClarity Controller focuses on simplification and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix setup complexity and steep learning curve are noted. Enhancements in integration capabilities with third-party tools are suggested for Lenovo XClarity Controller. Both products need more user-friendly documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix deployment is time-consuming and needs skilled administrators. Lenovo XClarity Controller has a quick and straightforward installation process. Lenovo XClarity Controller's customer service is highly praised, while Zabbix's is rated positively, though not exceptionally.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is cost-effective initially as an open-source solution but may accrue costs through customization and maintenance. Lenovo XClarity Controller has a higher upfront cost but delivers strong ROI through reduced downtime and efficient management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Lenovo XClarity Controller
Ranking in Server Monitoring
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zabbix
Ranking in Server Monitoring
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (10th), Network Monitoring Software (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Lenovo XClarity Controller is 6.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 21.1%, down from 23.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Ambast - PeerSpot reviewer
Good remote management capability and easy to setup and to manage but slow performance
For the betterment of the server, I'm not sure, but it worked very slowly. It was not well on performance. So, that could be improved. There was no issue or problem with the software. In the beginning, there was a lack of knowledge, but it was good and handy because once we understood it, it was easy to manage and take care by ourselves.
Read full review
ASM Naushad Alam - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes
We have not yet purchased the commercial version so have a lack of technical ability. We do not yet fully know the key points or key features of the solution. We just use what we use along with WhatsUp Gold. Based on our use only, stability is rated a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to provide insights into server status and alerts."
"The most valuable feature of Lenovo XClarity is the ease of use because of the interface browser that is highly compatible and it has mobile web management."
"The remote management capability was also good."
"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"Zabbix has a roadmap and they are continuously and frequently adding new features."
"It provides high scalability, alerting, notification, templating, and end-to-end security."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
More Zabbix pros
 

Cons

"They could enable notifications on emails and phones regarding control panel information."
"Lenovo XClarity can improve the dashboard integration. For example, graphs could be better. Additionally, more integration with other vendors is needed. For example, VMware has integration with a lot of vendors."
"It worked very slowly. It was not well on performance."
"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."
"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."
"​I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes.​"
"I'm using the free version of Zabbix, and I'd like to see more customization options, especially for setting trigger thresholds."
"Correlation of events would be a wonderful addition."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
"Improvement is needed as per customer requirements."
"There is a bit of a learning curve during installation."
More Zabbix cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."
"I was using the free, Community Edition."
"Zabbix is an open-source tool, and it's free to use."
"It is worth every cent to pay or even study to do your own installation."
"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
"The solution is free to use but they offer support as a paid service. If you can go read the manuals and do the fine-tuning based on your needs, you do not need to pay anything and you will have a full solution."
"This solution is open-source and free to use."
More Zabbix pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Media Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lenovo XClarity Controller?
The product's most valuable feature is its ability to provide insights into server status and alerts.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Lenovo XClarity Controller?
For the betterment of the server, I'm not sure, but it worked very slowly. It was not well on performance. So, that could be improved. There was no issue or problem with the software. In the beginn...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Lenovo XClarity Controller?
It's used to manage the OS on the servers, which are Windows Server 2016 and 2019. We also use it for storage, with 3 to 6 TB of space, and for software deployment from our business solutions. We p...
See all answers
What do you like most about Zabbix?
The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?
I use the tool's free version.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zabbix?
I'm using the free version of Zabbix, and I'd like to see more customization options, especially for setting trigger thresholds.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

HPE System Management Homepage vs Lenovo XClarity Controller Logo
HPE System Management Homepage vs Lenovo XClarity Controller
Compared 43% of the time
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Lenovo XClarity Controller Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Lenovo XClarity Controller
Compared 8% of the time
Huawei iBMC vs Lenovo XClarity Controller Logo
Huawei iBMC vs Lenovo XClarity Controller
Compared 3% of the time
More Lenovo XClarity Controller Competitors
LibreNMS vs Zabbix Logo
LibreNMS vs Zabbix
Compared 9% of the time
Icinga vs Zabbix Logo
Icinga vs Zabbix
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmk vs Zabbix Logo
Checkmk vs Zabbix
Compared 7% of the time
Centreon vs Zabbix Logo
Centreon vs Zabbix
Compared 4% of the time
More Zabbix Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
November 2024
Lenovo XClarity Controller reportDownload Lenovo XClarity Controller product report
Buyer's Guide
Zabbix
October 2024
Zabbix reportDownload Zabbix product report
 

Also Known As

XClarity Controller, Lenovo XCC
No data available
 

Learn More

Lenovo
Zabbix
 

Overview

Lenovo ThinkSystem servers contain an integrated service processor, XClarity Controller (XCC), which provides advanced service-processor control, monitoring, and alerting functions. This document summarizes the features of XCC and the upgrades available to ThinkSystem servers.

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services. 

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting. 

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba
Buyer's Guide
Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix
October 2024
Free Report: Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix
Find out what your peers are saying about Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.