We performed a comparison between Lenovo XClarity Controller and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's most valuable feature is its ability to provide insights into server status and alerts."
"The most valuable feature of Lenovo XClarity is the ease of use because of the interface browser that is highly compatible and it has mobile web management."
"The solution is stable."
"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."
"The performance and bandwidth are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the support for monitoring Cisco switches."
"The integration capabilities and APIs are the best part."
"The most valuable feature is the protocol to manage anything."
"The implementation process is very straightforward."
"They could enable notifications on emails and phones regarding control panel information."
"Lenovo XClarity can improve the dashboard integration. For example, graphs could be better. Additionally, more integration with other vendors is needed. For example, VMware has integration with a lot of vendors."
"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."
"Outside of the normal standard monitoring, I would like to extend patching, importing patching, and supporting patching for Windows Servers."
"Zabbix claims that there is an auto-discovery process but my team member was facing difficulty and was told that it's not really automatic, and there are some manual steps."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
"The stability could be better."
"If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice."
"The user web interface is a little bit too basic, we need to link Zabbix to Grafana to have more options, such as graphs and charts. The interface needs to be improved. Additionally, there could be better integration with Grafana API."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
Lenovo XClarity Controller is ranked 16th in Server Monitoring with 2 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Server Monitoring with 101 reviews. Lenovo XClarity Controller is rated 9.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Lenovo XClarity Controller writes "Quick scaling, easy to use, and useful mobile management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Lenovo XClarity Controller is most compared with HPE System Management, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and Huawei iBMC, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Lenovo XClarity Controller vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.