Logz.io vs Trellix ESM comparison

Logz.io and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logz.io is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.4, while Trellix is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.2. Logz.io holds a 0.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Trellix’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Logz.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Logz.io

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

524 Views
368 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix ESM

Read 36 Trellix ESM reviews

2,492 Views
916 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Logz.io

Trellix ESM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and Logz.io are two prominent solutions in the security information and event management (SIEM) category. While Logz.io appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, Trellix ESM offers a cost-effective solution.

Features: Trellix ESM provides integrated threat intelligence, customizable dashboards, and comprehensive support. Logz.io features machine learning capabilities, extensive integrations with other tools, and advanced analytics, making it more robust for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM requires better reporting functionalities, enhanced real-time analytics, and improved log management. Logz.io needs improvements in log storage capacity, more detailed documentation, and optimized data ingestion processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM is known for straightforward deployment and commendable customer support. Logz.io's deployment is slightly more complex, but it offers responsive customer service to mitigate these challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM offers a lower setup cost and faster ROI, making it financially attractive. Logz.io, although higher in initial cost, provides long-term value through its rich features and robust performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (20th)

Trellix ESM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

28th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix ESM is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

Daniel Durian

Senior Information Security Manager at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Helps to monitor and detect cyberattacks

The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick. Trellix ESM provides situation awareness. On the dashboard, I can see outbound and inbound communications to known threat hosts, IPS/IDS activity, and threat intelligence of the perimeter defense in the firewall. This information helps preempt attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"It blocks the things which are not to be allowed. It has an adaptive mode where it learns for itself."

"It is easy to use."

"I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. The deployment is completed in two days."

"I like the ease of deployment."

"The support I have received from the vendor has been great."

"It can be easily deployed with the other solutions."

"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."

"The solution's technical support is great."

More Trellix ESM pros

Cons

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"The initial setup is difficult and could improve."

"The user interface could be more user-friendly."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There's no software support from McAfee."

"It is not a very advanced solution, and it is for very generic use cases. It cannot cope with the advanced requirements that we're going to have. For example, for multiple authentication failures, it is still based on Windows events for detecting multiple login failures, whereas other companies are going beyond and working on implementing two-factor authentication. It is time to correlate the two-factor authentication results with authentification failures, which is not happening with McAfee ESM. The performance of the tool should be improved because it is very slow. The data display on the console is very slow in McAfee ESM. Its data storage is still old-fashioned, and it should be improved and upgraded to the latest versions. They have to come up with some new ideas to match what other leaders in the same domain are doing. For example, in Splunk, when you search for information for the last 60 days or five months, it quickly shows the information, but that is not the case with McAfee. The results should be quicker and faster on the console. They should integrate some additional features such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and automation. The threat intelligence part should also be improved on McAfee."

"I would like to see fingerprint recognition included in the next release of this solution."

"The disk space needed for events is not clear. In all clients, we had at least more than 100GB free that we could not use."

"We acquired the IBM product because McAfee is slightly confusing to use, and it's broader."

More Trellix ESM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The product is a little expensive."

"The tool is an open source product."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"The price is good. It's moderate. We follow a pay-as-you-go model. There are different models available, and they can also be monthly. You can choose monthly or yearly. It's very flexible. If our existing customers exceed the current plan, you can just call McAfee and get it extended."

"The licensing cost is based on EPS."

"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."

"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."

"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."

"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."

"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"The pricing is fair."

More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

77%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee ESM?

The solution's technical support is great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?

Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?

The product is mature and needs little improvement, but we could enhance the customized dashboarding based on use cases.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 29% of the time

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 21% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io

Compared 11% of the time

Wazuh vs Logz.io

Compared 9% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs Trellix ESM

Compared 25% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM

Compared 20% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 10% of the time

More Trellix ESM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io

March 2025

Download Logz.io product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix ESM

March 2025

Download Trellix ESM product report

Also Known As

Logz

McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager

Overview

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Logz.io

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM

March 2025

Free Report: Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM

Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logz.io vs. Trellix ESM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.