Malwarebytes vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Malwarebytes and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.9, while Trellix is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.6. Malwarebytes holds a 1.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes

Read 36 Malwarebytes reviews

4,702 Views
4,082 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

6,318 Views
4,828 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Malwarebytes and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) compete in the cybersecurity space. Users are generally happier with the features of Malwarebytes, but Trellix ENS has more robust enterprise capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger organizations.

Features: Malwarebytes is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness in malware detection and removal. Trellix ENS offers comprehensive security features, including advanced threat detection and response, making it more suitable for complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Users mention that Malwarebytes could improve its reporting and analytics. Trellix ENS users highlight the need for a more streamlined configuration process. Both products receive feedback on enhancing their integration with other security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes is noted for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS, while requiring a more involved setup, offers robust support for enterprise deployments and complex security needs. Users appreciate the dedicated support teams provided by Trellix.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes is often seen as cost-effective with a good return on investment for small to mid-sized companies. Trellix ENS, despite higher setup costs, is considered worth the investment by large enterprises due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.7%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"The endpoint protection and response that allows us to restore a machine back to a pre-infected state are the most valuable features."

"The solution has a good management interface."

"It comprehensively finds and removes malicious software."

"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system."

"Being able to cloud manage it from just a cloud login is valuable. We can get to it from anywhere, which is really helpful. The fact that we can remediate from the cloud console is one of our favorite features."

"I like the solution's ability to detect potentially unwanted programs. For some reason, it seems superior to other solutions, or at least in comparison to McAfee."

"When it comes to frontend protections, it has some of the best definitions. In addition, they do traditional signature and heuristic detection a lot better than Microsoft and some other players in that space."

More Malwarebytes pros

"MVISION offers decent protection."

"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."

"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."

"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."

"Technical support is excellent."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the way it is deployed, in terms of being able to distribute it. Right now we have to get our hands on a machine to deploy it. It would be nice if there was an easier system."

"We had a little performance problem with the solution, but that's been resolved. Since then, it's been running well."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

"The product is a little bit more expensive than the other brands."

"The product could be improved in blocking malicious traffic, such as communication with known malicious IP addresses."

More Malwarebytes cons

"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."

"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."

"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."

"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."

"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"It is expensive."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

"The product pricing is high."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

Malwarebytes is a bit pricey for some regions, such as Ukraine, since it's priced in US dollars. I prefer to use the paid version, and I am a pay-to-play person.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have me...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 26% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 5% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes

January 2025

Download Malwarebytes product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

December 2024

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Learn More

Malwarebytes

Trellix

Overview

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

January 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.