Malwarebytes vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Malwarebytes and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while Trellix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.5. Malwarebytes holds a 1.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes

Read 37 Malwarebytes reviews

3,980 Views
3,462 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

4,570 Views
3,544 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Malwarebytes and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) compete in the cybersecurity space. Users are generally happier with the features of Malwarebytes, but Trellix ENS has more robust enterprise capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger organizations.

Features: Malwarebytes is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness in malware detection and removal. Trellix ENS offers comprehensive security features, including advanced threat detection and response, making it more suitable for complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Users mention that Malwarebytes could improve its reporting and analytics. Trellix ENS users highlight the need for a more streamlined configuration process. Both products receive feedback on enhancing their integration with other security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes is noted for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS, while requiring a more involved setup, offers robust support for enterprise deployments and complex security needs. Users appreciate the dedicated support teams provided by Trellix.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes is often seen as cost-effective with a good return on investment for small to mid-sized companies. Trellix ENS, despite higher setup costs, is considered worth the investment by large enterprises due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

27th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is its ability to customize for different groups."

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"It comprehensively finds and removes malicious software."

"The endpoint protection and response that allows us to restore a machine back to a pre-infected state are the most valuable features."

"Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"The most valuable feature is that it stops malware, which is important."

"This solution helps us by providing central management of anti-malware and anti-exploit functionality."

More Malwarebytes pros

"I found the initial setup to be easy."

"The product can be installed in almost any environment"

"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."

"Technical support is excellent."

"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."

"It's a stable solution with good performance."

"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"Malwarebytes is too simplistic. From a SOC IR perspective, it doesn't give you very much data around it. It doesn't tie things or provide SHA-1 and SHA-256 detection information, which makes it hard to do an additional investigation."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

"Malwarebytes is not there in the reports from Gartner or IDC...If we look at the market trends and the industry, most customers look at Gartner's reports to identify whether a product is a leader, challenger, or a big product, depending on which they choose."

"We had a little performance problem with the solution, but that's been resolved. Since then, it's been running well."

"The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

"My clients have frequently encountered some tech support scams where when you go to a particular website, it throws up a fake warning to you and states that you need to call this number."

More Malwarebytes cons

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."

"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."

"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."

"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."

"They could provide better integration capabilities for the product with other services."

"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."

"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."

"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

University

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 14% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes

March 2025

Download Malwarebytes product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Overview

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.