Malwarebytes vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Malwarebytes and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.9, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.6. Malwarebytes holds a 1.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes

Read 36 Malwarebytes reviews

5,000 Views
4,321 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 53 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

6,882 Views
5,189 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Malwarebytes and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) compete in the cybersecurity space. Users are generally happier with the features of Malwarebytes, but Trellix ENS has more robust enterprise capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger organizations.

Features: Malwarebytes is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness in malware detection and removal. Trellix ENS offers comprehensive security features, including advanced threat detection and response, making it more suitable for complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Users mention that Malwarebytes could improve its reporting and analytics. Trellix ENS users highlight the need for a more streamlined configuration process. Both products receive feedback on enhancing their integration with other security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes is noted for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS, while requiring a more involved setup, offers robust support for enterprise deployments and complex security needs. Users appreciate the dedicated support teams provided by Trellix.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes is often seen as cost-effective with a good return on investment for small to mid-sized companies. Trellix ENS, despite higher setup costs, is considered worth the investment by large enterprises due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Venugopal Potumudi

Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

"The solution has a good management interface."

"It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly."

"The platform is straightforward to install."

"The solution is very good at scanning."

"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."

"The technical support services are good."

"The behavior-based detection is very nice, and it combats zero-day threats by looking for anomalous behaviors."

More Malwarebytes pros

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

"The seamless deployment is very valuable."

"The agents are easy to deploy."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."

"The independent modules are very good."

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"They should make it faster, less taxing on the processor."

"We experience a lot of false positives."

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

"There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity."

"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."

"The product is a little bit more expensive than the other brands."

"There is room for improvement in the way it is deployed, in terms of being able to distribute it. Right now we have to get our hands on a machine to deploy it. It would be nice if there was an easier system."

More Malwarebytes cons

"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."

"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."

"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."

"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."

"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."

"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."

"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"The product pricing is high."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Government

Retailer

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

Malwarebytes is a bit pricey for some regions, such as Ukraine, since it's priced in US dollars. I prefer to use the paid version, and I am a pay-to-play person.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have me...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 24% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes

December 2024

Download Malwarebytes product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

November 2024

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Learn More

Malwarebytes

Trellix

Overview

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

December 2024

Free Report: Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.