ManageEngine OpManager vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

ManageEngine and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4, while Juniper is ranked #48 with an average rating of 9.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 51 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,326 Views
2,033 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

208 Views
134 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in the network management solutions category. Based on the comparison, ManageEngine OpManager stands out for its cost-effectiveness and monitoring capabilities, whereas Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is advantageous for AI-driven insights and advanced functionalities.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers robust network performance monitoring, fault management, and customizable dashboards, providing users with comprehensive infrastructure control. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant leverages AI capabilities for predictive insights, automated troubleshooting, and operational efficiency enhancements, making it ideal for sophisticated network environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could improve by incorporating AI functionalities, enhancing integration with modern technologies, and offering more user-friendly setups. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant may benefit from expanding network monitoring features, creating more customizable dashboards, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers a traditional on-premises deployment model with extensive support options for organizations preferring direct installation. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant utilizes a cloud-based deployment simplifying system integration and reducing setup time. Marvis also focuses on providing responsive customer support aimed at solution efficiency, contrasting OpManager's conventional methods.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is available with a competitive pricing structure suitable for budget-conscious businesses, providing favorable ROI through lower upfront costs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant, while requiring higher initial investment, demonstrates long-term cost-effectiveness through AI optimizations reducing operational expenses. OpManager offers immediate affordability, while Marvis delivers greater ROI with prolonged integration.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

48th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."

"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."

"The solution is scalable."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

"The tool is useful for SNMP monitoring."

"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

Cons

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

"With regard to configurations, however, it would be nice to have more documentation on SNMP configurations. For example, if I want to add a new vendor, it would be great if ManageEngine provided the requirements for that vendor, such as the commands needed."

"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface."

"There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones."

"What I'd like ManageEngine OpManager to improve on is artificial intelligence. In particular, the machine learning feature should be integrated with the sensor flow. Doing this will give leverage, especially when you look at other products such as the Cisco DNA Center. When a switch goes down, I should be able to build on the correlation of other physical devices it's connected to so that I can integrate that with my CA CMDB. The ManageEngine OpManager team needs to draw a long-term roadmap where that feature becomes an integral part of the solution because right now, machine learning in ManageEngine OpManager is a long process. The solution doesn't have MLS search and I want to see ML being developed and applied for CA CMDB to greatly reduce the burden of tying everything. For example, if I have a data center switch that goes down now, I should know what server it's connected to, and when that switch goes down at twenty-four ports, I would get twenty-four alerts for different devices plugged in. I should be able to make a correlation that the major problem lies in the switch and not with the twenty-four elements connected to that switch. That is where machine learning should come into play and the ManageEngine OpManager AI should indicate "This is where the root of your problem is." It could be difficult, but this is a feature that should be improved or added to the solution."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It is reasonably priced."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

35%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

12%

Educational Organization

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 25% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 13% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 30% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 23% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 23% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

April 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

April 2025

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.