ManageEngine OpManager vs Wireshark comparison

"The solution is scalable."

"Desktop central products feature dashboards that are neat and offer comprehensive information."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."

"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."

"The dashboard is unique and user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."

"I can save the traffic and analysis when I want to. Also, it's especially helpful to follow the stream (TCP, UDP, etc.)."

"Wireshark has a lot of features. It's a powerful tool if you're familiar with it. You can see everything on the network with it."

"Wireshark is a good tool to start with network analyzing and packet capturing."

"The solution is easy to install and use."

"It's easy to troubleshoot issues because there's a large online community."

"I have found the most valuable feature you can design your sniffer the way you want to."

"I find Wireshark a very useful tool. Its best feature is that it allows me to deeply understand what's going on at the packet level, as well as any adverse signatures that I can analyze. When I need to create an IPS rule, I need to check the traffic deeply to get more insights about the actual traffic, what's the name of certain flags, etc., and I'm able to do all that through Wireshark. The tool is also user-friendly."

"The filter option provided by Wireshark is its most valuable feature...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."

"What I'd like ManageEngine OpManager to improve on is artificial intelligence. In particular, the machine learning feature should be integrated with the sensor flow. Doing this will give leverage, especially when you look at other products such as the Cisco DNA Center. When a switch goes down, I should be able to build on the correlation of other physical devices it's connected to so that I can integrate that with my CA CMDB. The ManageEngine OpManager team needs to draw a long-term roadmap where that feature becomes an integral part of the solution because right now, machine learning in ManageEngine OpManager is a long process. The solution doesn't have MLS search and I want to see ML being developed and applied for CA CMDB to greatly reduce the burden of tying everything. For example, if I have a data center switch that goes down now, I should know what server it's connected to, and when that switch goes down at twenty-four ports, I would get twenty-four alerts for different devices plugged in. I should be able to make a correlation that the major problem lies in the switch and not with the twenty-four elements connected to that switch. That is where machine learning should come into play and the ManageEngine OpManager AI should indicate "This is where the root of your problem is." It could be difficult, but this is a feature that should be improved or added to the solution."

"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."

"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface."

"We get a lot of false alerts."

"It is difficult to scale this solution."

"The solution’s user interface could be improved."

"Wireshark is restricted when any sort of encryption is involved, such as XSL encryption or DLX."

"I would like to see Wireshark improve the ease of application of the command. The command is very powerful, but not easy to apply."

"Wireshark gets stuck when it is a larger file."

"There is a disadvantage when it comes to sampling intervals. Additionally, I've heard from a colleague that Wireshark might be less effective in the voice domain."

"Wireshark could make the filtering rules easier to apply and offer a drag-and-drop option as opposed to type and text."

"I would like better control of bandwidth from the service provider."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Wireshark is free of charge, and there's no license involved."

"It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"It is an open-source solution."

"It is free."

"It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?"

"I am using the free version of this solution."