ManageEngine OpManager vs Wireshark comparison

"Device monitoring is a good tool of this solution."

"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."

"ManageEngine OpManager positively impacts organizations by allowing users to practically manage their network, so they can understand exactly what's happening and where the problems are coming from, ensuring proactive monitoring."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager makes it easy to monitor all the network alerts on the application."

"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."

"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

"Wireshark is a good tool to start with network analyzing and packet capturing."

"It has a good syntax to put the commands in and get information out of."

"Wireshark's best feature is that it's adaptive, which means it's the go-to tool for network-related developers."

"It's easy to troubleshoot issues because there's a large online community."

"I find Wireshark a very useful tool. Its best feature is that it allows me to deeply understand what's going on at the packet level, as well as any adverse signatures that I can analyze. When I need to create an IPS rule, I need to check the traffic deeply to get more insights about the actual traffic, what's the name of certain flags, etc., and I'm able to do all that through Wireshark. The tool is also user-friendly."

"You can use Wireshark to see the traffic packet format, the IP layers, the fields, and the enabled flags."

"The initial setup is simple."

"The session-level filtering features are valuable."

"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."

"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."

"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."

"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."

"The main drawback is there is less documentation available, both public documentation and partner-available documentation."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

"The installation of ManageEngine OpManager was difficult mainly due to the business view feature, as many customers in Vietnam want the team to develop more detailed capabilities regarding the business view."

"The product is great but I wish there were more of an emphasis on the command line tools."

"Wireshark is similar to an OS defense tool, meaning that it runs on an OS such as Ubuntu and Fedora, but I'm unsure if it's compatible with Windows or if it's a straightforward process to run it on Windows. Right now, my team needs to run Wireshark from a dongle to use it, so it's an OS-dependable tool, and that's an area for improvement. I was unable to use Wireshark on Windows, and I couldn't capture it, as I'm unsure how to configure the wireless card into monitoring mode on Windows. The process was straightforward on Linux, but it wasn't the case on Windows OS. It seems Wireshark isn't compatible with all OS. For example, you can analyze the log, and you can analyze it on the Windows server, but you can't do a capture in Windows. Configuring Wireshark for Windows isn't as easy as configuring it for Linux."

"I would like better control of bandwidth from the service provider."

"I would like to see Wireshark improve the ease of application of the command. The command is very powerful, but not easy to apply."

"The speed of the Internet could be improved, especially its performance."

"I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated."

"I have not used Wireshark to an advanced point where I could provide a detailed opinion on improvements needed."

"We would like the product to be developed so that it doesn't rely on internet access for installation. We would like to see all of the components required to be integrated into the installer."

"The product is not worth the money."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"It is reasonably priced."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"The tool is free."

"I've never personally had to pay for it, making it a highly valuable internet resource that's accessible for use. While they offer some paid versions, our firm has utilized the free version for the past three years."

"Wireshark is free of charge, and there's no license involved."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"Wireshark is open-source and free of charge."

"Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark."

"Wireshark is open source and gives great value and functionality to the network investigation."

"We're using the free version of Wireshark."