ManageEngine OpManager vs Wireshark comparison

"I am satisfied with ManageEngine OpManager's monitoring features."

"Customer Service: Excellent. It was on my initial contact that the rep suggested I wait a day to download the product, as more functionality would be added to the free version."

"We monitor customer networks with it and the performance is extremely good."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."

"The alerting feature has improved our organization, as we can create multiple alerts and refine them to how we need to use them."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."

"Rich GUI tool to monitor infrastructure."

"One of the best products that can provide the details of what is happening with an application and the full life cycle of the response time."

"I believe everyone should use this tool if they need to analyze packets."

"Wireshark is a dynamic software that has developed and adapted to the latest technology advancements and network challenges."

"Wireshark is very user-friendly; even someone with basic IT knowledge can use it."

"The drill-down available for packet analysis is great, as it gives a network security engineer insight into what is going on at the packet level and enables better troubleshooting."

"Wireshark is a great tool to help network engineers identify network problems like broadcasting, injection, poisoning, etc."

"I can save the traffic and analysis when I want to. Also, it's especially helpful to follow the stream (TCP, UDP, etc.)."

"Wireshark is a good tool to start with network analyzing and packet capturing."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on."

"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."

"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."

"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them."

"With regard to configurations, however, it would be nice to have more documentation on SNMP configurations. For example, if I want to add a new vendor, it would be great if ManageEngine provided the requirements for that vendor, such as the commands needed."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

"The licensing model is confusing."

"A room for improvement in Wireshark is its ease of use for beginners. It could be better. Another room for improvement in the tool is for it to provide more details about the traffic load. At the moment, Wireshark is adequate for me, so there isn't anything I'd like added to it in its next version."

"It needs the ability to follow multiple interfaces for specific traffic from different network zones/virtual networks. It would help to understand how any packet is going through the network."

"It would be better if they offered a hybrid version like My Cloud Control."

"One con is that this software is only an observer, not an interactive component of the network, meaning you cant change anything with it."

"We'd like to be able to extract the output into an Excel table."

"The speed of the Internet could be improved, especially its performance."

"Wireshark could be improved with a delay option when getting data automatically."

"We would like the product to be developed so that it doesn't rely on internet access for installation. We would like to see all of the components required to be integrated into the installer."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"The pricing is moderate."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

"It is reasonably priced."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."

"It is free."

"We're using the free version of Wireshark."

"Wireshark is open-source and free of charge."

"Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"I am using the free version of this solution."

"It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?"