ManageEngine OpManager vs Wireshark comparison

"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."

"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."

"The solution is scalable."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."

"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."

"The alerting feature has improved our organization. We can create multiple alerts and refine them to how we need to use them."

"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."

"Being able to dissect email data and figure out what is inside email messages was the most valuable feature. Such a feature is pretty helpful for an ongoing forensic investigation or when there is a potential insider threat that you are trying to investigate. It allows you to see the network activity of the users you are investigating. It also gives you more visibility into your network. It was very easy to set up. There is a lot of information out there on Google and YouTube about how to use it. There is also community support. If you have any trouble, it is pretty easy to find an answer online. You will have to do some digging only if you have a very specific use case."

"I have found the most valuable feature you can design your sniffer the way you want to."

"The GUI is easy to use."

"Wireshark has a lot of features. It's a powerful tool if you're familiar with it. You can see everything on the network with it."

"It's easy to troubleshoot issues because there's a large online community."

"The session-level filtering features are valuable."

"What's best about Wireshark is that it doesn't require installation. It supports cards and monitoring permissions and is sufficient for appending and capturing activities. You won't need to install other tools to use Wireshark, so this saves you time. You can capture packets at any time from your laptop through Wireshark."

"Wireshark saves a lot of time, especially with network troubleshooting."

"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."

"The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly."

"We get a lot of false alerts."

"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."

"The licensing model is confusing."

"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."

"The pricing could be cheaper. The initial integration does cost a bit."

"The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles."

"In the future, it would be nice to see color coding. It is just black and white."

"It would be better if they offered a hybrid version like My Cloud Control."

"Wireshark could be improved by adding more monitoring features."

"I would like better control of bandwidth from the service provider."

"A room for improvement in Wireshark is its ease of use for beginners. It could be better. Another room for improvement in the tool is for it to provide more details about the traffic load. At the moment, Wireshark is adequate for me, so there isn't anything I'd like added to it in its next version."

"You need some basic knowledge to work with Wireshark. Maybe it could be more user-friendly just for new users. Just for the new generation."

"The only thing that I don't like is sometimes there is an update, and something that I was using is either no longer there or it has changed."

"The product has been using the same GUI for many years."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"It is reasonably priced."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"Wireshark is free software, so you can download it and use it for free with no licensing fees."

"Wireshark is open source and gives great value and functionality to the network investigation."

"I've never personally had to pay for it, making it a highly valuable internet resource that's accessible for use. While they offer some paid versions, our firm has utilized the free version for the past three years."

"It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?"

"It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."

"Wireshark is an open-source product, so it's free to use."

"We're using the free version of Wireshark."