

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Zabbix are key players in system management solutions. Microsoft Configuration Manager seems to have the upper hand in terms of integration and comprehensive features, while Zabbix stands out for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility.
Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers software deployment, mobile management via Intune Connector, and comprehensive system management. Zabbix excels in monitoring with automated network discovery, versatile alerting, and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager needs improvements in application package deployment, PowerShell integration, and a simpler setup process. Zabbix's interface and reporting features could be enhanced, along with better support for predictive analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Microsoft Configuration Manager and Zabbix are primarily on-premises solutions with cloud options. Microsoft requires technical expertise due to a complex setup but has ample online resources. Zabbix is easier to deploy with extensive community support, albeit still requiring technical skills.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager is often more costly with justifiable features for large enterprises. In contrast, Zabbix offers a budget-friendly open-source model with optional paid support. This provides affordability for diverse monitoring needs despite potential higher initial setup efforts.
Their response time and first-level support quality need improvement.
For technical support from Microsoft, I would rate them a nine.
It is so straightforward that I have never had to use the support.
The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices.
Zabbix has high scalability.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
I would rate its scalability ten out of ten.
There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
I think the stability of Zabbix is around five to six on a scale of ten, where ten is the best and one is the worst.
Zabbix is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems with Zabbix itself.
A better command line interface for Microsoft Configuration Manager would be an additional feature I would to see in the future to make it closer to a perfect score.
Improvements are needed for servers. Servers are still not getting it properly, so we could add the servers in Microsoft Configuration Manager for things such as OS deployment and Autopilot as well.
The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best.
The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts.
The setup cost is considered sufficient.
The pricing for Microsoft Configuration Manager is okay for me.
Zabbix is providing everything free of cost.
It is literally free.
The most valuable features I find in Microsoft Configuration Manager are mostly patching, deploying software, deploying images, and running custom scripts.
Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices.
The product valuable for deployment recovery.
If disk usage surpasses a threshold, say 70%, I receive alerts and can take proactive action.
The alerting systems are very good in Zabbix, and it has helped us to reduce time for reaction.
People want to save costs, which is why they install Zabbix, but the reporting functionality is not properly developed.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zabbix | 18.1% |
| Microsoft Configuration Manager | 4.4% |
| Other | 77.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.
Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.
What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.
It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.
With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.