Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 27, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.0
Organizations save costs and reduce manual effort by automating updates and downloading them to a central point.
Sentiment score
8.8
Quest KACE streamlines system management, boosting productivity and cost savings, with minimal training needed for quick adoption.
The return on investment is seen in the quick access to information, good inventory management, and efficient systems management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
Customer service for Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is mixed, with praise for premium support but issues with wait times and responsiveness.
Sentiment score
8.3
Quest KACE SMA support is praised for fast, accurate responses, knowledgeable staff, and 24/7 availability through Premier Support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services supports high scalability, multi-level environments, hierarchical updates, and cloud integration for large enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.0
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance is scalable, user-friendly, and efficiently manages devices in varying network sizes despite some training challenges.
The product is very scalable as it supports 10,000 thousand endpoints with just one appliance.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is highly stable and reliable, though occasional bugs may occur depending on version and environment.
Sentiment score
7.4
Quest KACE SMA is reliable and stable, with quick support and performance improvements despite occasional infrastructure-related issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services requires improvements in usability, package validation, update grouping, reporting, integration, automation, stability, and security.
Quest KACE System's scalability, interface design, automation, and support need improvement, complicating software patching and integration processes.
The user interface needs improvement as customers have mentioned they do not like the interface since it is not an SMA-based interface.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is free with Windows Server, but additional storage and broader licensing costs may apply.
Quest KACE SMA offers competitive per-device pricing with robust features, valued by larger deployments despite some cost concerns.
The pricing is in the middle range of the market, not too expensive but not the cheapest either.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services offers centralized, scalable update management, detailed control, automated deployment, and compliance reporting for security and feature updates.
Quest KACE SMA enhances IT operations with integration, automation, and management tools, boosting productivity, security, and user experience.
The most valuable features include simplicity, which makes systems management easier and faster, especially for device management.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Windows Server Up...
Ranking in Patch Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Quest KACE Systems Manageme...
Ranking in Patch Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (14th), Endpoint Compliance (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is 9.2%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is 7.5%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Mashood Atitebi - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust and stable platform for centralized update management enhancing system security
One area for potential improvement involves the administrative portal, where numerous options, including asset management and patch management, are integrated. There's a suggestion that decoupling these integrated tools might be beneficial. This decoupling could involve separating services or options to provide more flexibility and potentially reduce costs, allowing for a more modular approach to the utilization of these tools.
Scott Tweed - PeerSpot reviewer
Low maintenance, reliable, and easy to create packages
I like how when you click on the device, it shows you everything that has changed as well as the software versioning. I am really enjoying the inventory aspect of it. The deployment process for both deploying and creating a package is straightforward. I believe the inventory in KACE is superior to SCCM's. I know with SCCM I could do things like remote console into machines via the agent's remote console, but that is not a feature that is provided in KACE. I know that at least in the Systems Management Appliance, I can't get to it. I'm not sure how distribution works, with distribution points. I'm not sure if KACE has that feature. You could use an SCCM to set up distribution points at remote sites so that they don't have to download patches or software from across the country. If you have a DP or something similar, they could pull it down.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
11%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Windows Server Update Services?
Our experience with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services involves no setup cost or licensing fees, as it is included with our existing licenses.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services?
There are several areas needing improvement, including the management of third-party patches, better enforcement of patch deployment on user PCs, and the ability to schedule updates at specific tim...
What do you like most about Quest KACE Systems Management?
KACE automatically tracks this information and saves it for me, allowing me to call it up on the dashboard. For example, if I need to find Juliano's computer in the system, I don't need to search t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Systems Management?
The pricing is in the middle range of the market, not too expensive but not the cheapest either.
What needs improvement with Quest KACE Systems Management?
The user interface needs improvement as customers have mentioned they do not like the interface since it is not an SMA-based interface and lacks a manual configuration option.
 

Also Known As

Windows Server Update Services, Microsoft WSUS, WSUS, Microsoft Software Update Services, Software Update Services, Microsoft SUS, SUS, MS Windows Server Update Services
Dell KACE Systems Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Waypoint, Mattos Filho, Meetic, Gems Education, Green Clinic HealthSystem, Service King
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.