MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Salesforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Salesforce is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

3,663 Views
2,293 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 9 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,558 Views
1,782 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Red Hat AMQ are leading integration platforms in the market. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and extensive features.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a vast array of connectors, pre-built templates, and a comprehensive toolkit which simplifies integration processes. Red Hat AMQ delivers robust messaging capabilities, seamless integration with other Red Hat products, and high performance and reliability. While both have strong features, MuleSoft's comprehensive toolkit provides an edge in versatility.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform could improve its monitoring tools, reduce complexity for new users, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. Red Hat AMQ needs better documentation, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced support for cloud-based deployments. Although both platforms have growth areas, MuleSoft's learning curve and monitoring tools are more frequently cited.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is known for its straightforward deployment process, user-friendly setup steps, and responsive customer service. Red Hat AMQ also offers easy deployment but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support responsiveness. MuleSoft’s combination of easier deployment and reliable support gives it an advantage.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is generally seen as more expensive, with costs justified by strong ROI due to extensive features and capabilities. Red Hat AMQ is viewed as more cost-effective, though its ROI might not match MuleSoft's due to fewer features. Despite the higher cost, MuleSoft tends to be seen as worth the investment for its additional functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Corydon Hinton

Principal Systems Engineer at Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc.

Mar 19, 2024

Can seamlessly translate protocols and produce fairly quick results

Using the solution was great. It was part of the project that we didn't worry that much about. What I also liked about it was that even though I'm not that technical, I could go in and look at thoughts and events and confirm that the information we were looking for was making it across. I could check at the interface level and lessen the burden on validation within the application. The instrumentation within the solution is important. The ease of implementation is very important. Our partner development team had little trouble dealing with these diverse systems, with JSON on the one hand and SOAP on the other. The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great. The API-led connectivity is great. The reason that we took on the product was that we wanted to learn about it. We wanted to figure out how to use it. A big payoff for this will be in EHR integrations. These systems are all alike, yet they are all different. They all use EPIC, and each installation is a little bit different. It’s a challenge when we go to different hospitals. MuleSoft has made a name for itself in using the integrations.

Read full review

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

Apr 9, 2024

An easy-to-learn solution that can be used with microservices

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility has been great overall."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

"The use of ACK is valuable."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."

"Initially, we faced challenges managing numerous scheduled jobs and duplicate entries in our SAP system. To address this, we developed a reusable component in Mule that all applications could use to interact with SAP."

"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."

"Mule Anypoint Platform should improve its pricing. In my experience, a customer using the sandbox version couldn't upgrade to the final version because it exceeded their budget. Another area for improvement is the login mechanism. We need to integrate with third-party products for strong authentication, but it would be better if MuleSoft had its own robust login mechanism."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

"The price could be improved."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"The product is still very expensive."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"The solution has a high price."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat AMQ?

AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The product needs to improve its documentation and training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

We just started working with Red Hat AMQ. We selected it as the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) platform for a new airport project. I manage the entire Master System Integration (MSI) project for one ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 29% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 28% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 20% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 6% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

October 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

October 2024

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Learn More

Salesforce

Red Hat

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

October 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.