MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Salesforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Salesforce holds a 7.7% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 60 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

10,232 Views
1,535 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 10 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,003 Views
1,482 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Red Hat AMQ are both strong contenders in the integration platform market, each offering distinct advantages. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive API management capabilities and visually driven interface.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a comprehensive suite for API management and integration, featuring an easy-to-use, visually driven interface, extensive connectors, and scalable performance across cloud and on-premise deployments. Red Hat AMQ provides reliable messaging features, supports various messaging patterns, and emphasizes stability, making it ideal for message-driven applications.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft needs enhancements in batch processing capabilities, runtime management, and offers high pricing which could be prohibitive for smaller businesses. Its user interface can be daunting for beginners, and documentation for troubleshooting could be improved. Red Hat AMQ could enhance monitoring tools, integrate better with external tools like Jira, and accelerate deployment speeds for updates, with pricing also being an area for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides flexible deployment options across public, private, and hybrid cloud environments, offering helpful customer service that could improve in response time. Red Hat AMQ offers robust deployment capabilities and is notable for its client-centric support, delivering a more personalized and responsive customer service experience.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's pricing is perceived as high and complex, potentially intimidating smaller businesses yet delivering good ROI for larger organizations due to its comprehensive features. Red Hat AMQ presents itself as a cost-effective option with a simpler licensing model, making it attractive to a broader range of business sizes while offering competitive potential ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 7.7%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 9.5%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	7.7%
Red Hat AMQ	9.5%
Other	82.8%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Greg O

Senior Validation Engineer at Weir Group PLC

Integration workflows have become transparent and secure while error tracking is streamlined

The best features in MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for me are transparency between logging in or deploying and using different environments. Managing different environments for the transparency of error logins or how to trace traceability is very important. It's very easy to use and sort, so you can see where everything has gone right and everything has gone wrong. I'm aware of the drag-and-drop interface in MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, and it's very, very quick. It's very time-saving and very efficient. The security features on MuleSoft Anypoint Platform help maintain data integrity in my organization; I would say it's second to none. It's one of the best out there that I have worked with because of the encryption and decryption, and there are a lot of security aspects. I would assess the platform's data mapping and transformation capabilities as amazing. Automation has been straightforward; the transformation and mapping have been easy to use, easy to source, and from the source to the target. I would say it has been very good.

Read full review

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Efficiently manages high availability and fault tolerance for critical systems with user-friendly management features

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MuleSoft's integration with Salesforce products makes it a preferred choice for those setups."

"The most valuable feature for me is the Exchange sub-tool."

"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."

"The API-led connectivity approach of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers specific functionality based on various conditions."

"The flexibility has been great overall."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring; on the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails, and it also shows utilization in the tool."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."

"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"The product is expensive."

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"The solution has a high price."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"The product is still very expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 32% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 26% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

January 2026

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management and integration capabilities with scalability, ensuring seamless connectivity across systems.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers API management and integration capabilities within a user-friendly interface. With a range of connectors and the ability to handle integration patterns, it enables data integration across environments with support for API-led connectivity. High scalability, observability, batch processing, and tooling are key features, enhancing performance while simplifying deployment.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

API Management: Comprehensive tools for managing APIs effectively.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates diverse integration patterns.
Connectors: Extensive library for connecting various systems.
Observability: Enhances monitoring and performance tracking.
Batch Processing: Manages large volumes of data efficiently.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Scalability: Adaptable to growing data demands across platforms.
Performance: Simplifies complex deployments and improves processing.
Flexibility: Supports multiple environments, from cloud to on-premises.
User-Friendly: Streamlines integration processes with robust tools.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is employed by organizations for API management and seamless integration across systems in industries like retail and e-commerce. It connects enterprise applications in environments such as SAP and Salesforce. Users leverage it for data transformation and synchronization, achieving efficient real-time processing and a middleware layer across systems.

Salesforce

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

December 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.