MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Salesforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Red Hat is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Salesforce holds a 11.0% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 57 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

3,231 Views
2,019 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 9 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,343 Views
1,639 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 8, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Red Hat AMQ are both key players in the API management and messaging market. MuleSoft seems to have an edge in integration capabilities with its extensive connectors, while Red Hat AMQ is notable for its scalability and affordability, especially within OpenShift deployments.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers remarkable API management flexibility, supporting cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments. It boasts over 200 connectors and includes DataWeave for data transformation. Its Anypoint Exchange facilitates API reuse. Red Hat AMQ is recognized for its reliability and scalability in large-scale message processing, especially in OpenShift, and supports multiple protocols and microservices.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft faces criticism for its complex pricing and runtime management. There are calls for simplifying integration and enhancing support. Red Hat AMQ requires better integration with other software, enhanced monitoring capabilities, and improved documentation to support users effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers diverse deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds, though its customer service receives varied feedback, with premium support being more responsive. Red Hat AMQ is primarily deployed on-premise, excelling in customer service with personalized and proactive support highly regarded by users.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft’s complex pricing model and high cost are challenges for smaller firms, though enterprise users experience significant ROI in maintenance reductions and enhanced integration. Red Hat AMQ presents a cost-effective, straightforward open-source licensing model, providing great value within OpenShift, appealing for its affordability.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 11.0%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 8.8%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

An easy-to-learn solution that can be used with microservices

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

"The tool helps with order management and automates the enterprise's orchestration, invoice creation, product maintenance, and product life cycle. The API manager feature helps us configure, secure, and call APIs."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

"It reduces manual loads in maintaining servers as it comes with the Cloud Hub feature."

"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."

"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."

"Good interface, simple to use and stable."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."

"The stability could be better."

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

"MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market."

"Over the years, Mule Anypoint Platform has undergone significant improvements. When I first started using it, the API gateway capabilities were fairly basic."

"Mule should have better B2B integration."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat AMQ?

AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The product needs to improve its documentation and training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

We just started working with Red Hat AMQ. We selected it as the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) platform for a new airport project. I manage the entire Master System Integration (MSI) project for one ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 31% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 27% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 21% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon SQS vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 1% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

February 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

February 2025

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

January 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.