MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Salesforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Red Hat is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 56 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

3,432 Views
2,217 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 9 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,469 Views
1,717 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 8, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Red Hat AMQ are both key players in the API management and messaging market. MuleSoft seems to have an edge in integration capabilities with its extensive connectors, while Red Hat AMQ is notable for its scalability and affordability, especially within OpenShift deployments.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers remarkable API management flexibility, supporting cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments. It boasts over 200 connectors and includes DataWeave for data transformation. Its Anypoint Exchange facilitates API reuse. Red Hat AMQ is recognized for its reliability and scalability in large-scale message processing, especially in OpenShift, and supports multiple protocols and microservices.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft faces criticism for its complex pricing and runtime management. There are calls for simplifying integration and enhancing support. Red Hat AMQ requires better integration with other software, enhanced monitoring capabilities, and improved documentation to support users effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers diverse deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds, though its customer service receives varied feedback, with premium support being more responsive. Red Hat AMQ is primarily deployed on-premise, excelling in customer service with personalized and proactive support highly regarded by users.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft’s complex pricing model and high cost are challenges for smaller firms, though enterprise users experience significant ROI in maintenance reductions and enhanced integration. Red Hat AMQ presents a cost-effective, straightforward open-source licensing model, providing great value within OpenShift, appealing for its affordability.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (10th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at CBL Solutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

An easy-to-learn solution that can be used with microservices

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most beneficial features for handling data integration with Mule Anypoint Platform include its ability to integrate seamlessly with other popular platforms like IBM, Dell Boomi, and Microsoft Azure. MuleSoft stands out due to its unique one-point solution for various integration problems, including application and network integration, and its iPaaS services. The Design Center allows for designing APIs that can be made into reusable assets. Additionally, MuleSoft's capability to handle various technologies, such as Python and Java Spring Boot APIs, and monitor them using the Flex Gateway is valuable. Regarding API management, MuleSoft offers a gateway facility, including Flex Gateway, which supports API management with robust governance capabilities. Policies like rate limiting, blocklisting, allowlisting, and client ID enforcement can all be managed through the API Manager, providing comprehensive control over API operations."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."

"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."

"API management."

"It's easy to develop APIs."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"The stability could be better."

"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."

"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."

"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat AMQ?

AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The product needs to improve its documentation and training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

We just started working with Red Hat AMQ. We selected it as the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) platform for a new airport project. I manage the entire Master System Integration (MSI) project for one ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 29% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 28% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

December 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

December 2024

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Learn More

Salesforce

Red Hat

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

December 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.