Nagios Core vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,268 Views
1,665 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Nagios Core are competitors in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management space. ScienceLogic appears to have an upper hand with its extensive features and robust support, while Nagios Core stands out for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility.

Features: ScienceLogic offers dynamic apps, multi-tenancy support, and highly customizable features, enabling comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, advanced event management, and improved predictive analytics. Nagios Core presents a flexible and reliable system with customizable monitoring capabilities but primarily relies on community-driven plugins for additional features.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users point out the complexity in its interface, reporting limitations, and issues with integrating external platforms, alongside a demand for better automation and synthetic transaction monitoring. Nagios Core users face a steep learning curve during configuration, limited graphical interfaces, and basic reporting functions, calling for improvements in error reporting and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud deployments, providing excellent customer and technical support recognized for its responsiveness and expertise. Nagios Core, mainly used on-premises, is valued for its open-source nature, although it lacks formal support, depending on community resources for help.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is perceived as expensive, operating on a tiered pricing model based on device numbers. Its robust features often justify its cost for enterprises looking for long-term ROI. Nagios Core, being open-source, incurs no licensing costs, offering a cost-effective option for those with the skills for self-management and customization.

To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Nagios Core vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

8.8

Nagios Core reduces downtime and costs with quick alerts, providing full ROI and eliminating expensive monitoring tools.

Sentiment score

7.5

ScienceLogic enhances service quality, reduces incidents, and strengthens brand reputation, making it valuable for enterprises despite initial costs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.1

Nagios Core relies on community support, praised for stability and resources, but lacks official help compared to Nagios XI.

Sentiment score

7.8

ScienceLogic's support team is praised for professionalism and expertise, despite occasional delays, ensuring quick resolutions and customer satisfaction.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.7

Nagios Core shows scalability for large networks but may need customizations and integrations for distributed environments.

Sentiment score

6.9

ScienceLogic effectively handles global scalability, despite some hardware challenges, and supports enterprise growth with customizable automation features.

The solution is scalable.

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Nagios Core is highly stable and reliable with minimal footprint, supporting extensive monitoring without network burden.

Sentiment score

7.1

ScienceLogic is stable and scalable, though occasional bugs occur during upgrades; users rate its stability between six and nine.

I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Room For Improvement

Nagios Core needs a more intuitive interface, better scalability, and features like enhanced reporting and integration with modern tools.

ScienceLogic needs better reporting, user interface, vendor support, simpler integration, improved API, and efficient application monitoring for enterprises.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

Toshi Longkumer

Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy

Setup Cost

Nagios Core is a free, cost-effective open-source tool, but requires Linux expertise and incurs hosting and maintenance costs.

ScienceLogic offers flexible yet potentially high pricing, starting at $25K, with costs based on device count and features.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

It could be cheaper.

Toshi Longkumer

Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy

Valuable Features

Nagios Core provides flexible, low-resource monitoring with customization, automation, efficient alerts, and integration support for reliable IT performance visibility.

ScienceLogic provides scalable, customizable monitoring with advanced analytics and integration, enhancing service delivery through intuitive and flexible solutions.

It has a very handy dashboard, providing live alerts and visibility for everything.

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.

Toshi Longkumer

Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

The cost is medium. It could be cheaper.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 27% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 18% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 9% of the time

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download Nagios Core product report

Nagios Core

March 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

March 2025

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell