New Relic vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

New Relic and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while SolarWinds is ranked #58 with an average rating of 6.0. New Relic holds a 8.1% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 158 New Relic reviews

18,442 Views
14,557 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

686 Views
412 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

New Relic

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

New Relic and SolarWinds Pingdom both provide monitoring solutions. New Relic stands out for its advanced data analysis and real-time monitoring, while SolarWinds Pingdom is known for its simplicity and effective website performance monitoring. New Relic generally receives better reviews for support services, but SolarWinds Pingdom is recognized for its intuitive setup and lower costs.

Features: New Relic offers extensive data monitoring, real-time analytics, and deep performance insights. SolarWinds Pingdom provides straightforward web performance monitoring, user experience tracking, and effective web performance features.

Room for Improvement: New Relic could benefit from more straightforward configuration options, improved user-friendliness, and simplification of certain aspects. SolarWinds Pingdom could enhance its comprehensive analytics capabilities, advanced reporting features, and overall analytical depth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: New Relic's deployment process is comprehensive but sometimes complex, supported by strong customer service. SolarWinds Pingdom is commended for its easy and quick deployment process along with effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: New Relic has higher setup costs but offers substantial returns on investment due to its powerful monitoring tools. SolarWinds Pingdom has lower setup costs and provides good value for standard monitoring needs. Users find New Relic worth the investment for advanced capabilities, while SolarWinds Pingdom is cost-effective for simpler use.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), AIOps (3rd)

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

58th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 8.1%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Iqbal Khowaja

Chief Technology Officer at State of Hawaii

Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features

My organization uses many application performance management solutions, such as AppDynamics, New Relic APM, Splunk, and Datadog. I'm the CTO for the state of Hawaii, and across the board, different departments use different APM tools. I'm using the latest version of New Relic APM, but I cannot recall the exact version. My company has a dozen engineers using and monitoring New Relic APM. I'd tell anyone planning to use New Relic APM that it has to fit what you have. For example, most of my company's payload is in AWS, and the tool has adopters and features that CloudWatch cannot provide. Still, New Relic APM can, so you should do a demo or trial run first and see if it's a tool that'll help you with end-to-end monitoring. New Relic APM is working well for my company, so an excellent way to start is to do a trial run to see how the tool works out for your current applications. My rating for the tool is nine out of ten because my experience with it has been great. New Relic also worked closely with my company and has always been upfront on what's available and what's not. My company is a New Relic APM customer.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful."

"Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort."

"Sometimes, I monitor the user's time of response and use this information to improve the number of servers on the back-end. Or, I can use it to change my back log for front-end developers and improve their response times. It's very important in this case because I can improve the experience of the final user."

"Their technical support is pretty good and responsive. We have a real good relationship with them."

"End-user Synthetics and monitoring are very good."

"As soon as it monitors all our systems and is integrated with PagerDuty, the operations team just needs to wait for alerts on their cellphones to fix things."

"The solution is quite stable."

"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."

More New Relic pros

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

Cons

"It is complicated, especially in how you interpret the data that it provides. If it had a bit more canned, out-of-the-box features, especially some of the reporting features, that would be more useful."

"I think that there have been some questionable product enhancements. Over a year ago, New Relic rolled out a new navigation that really disrupted our workflow."

"We would like a dashboard feature to be created for this product. This would allow us to monitor both the front and back-end of our UIs performance, and then report on it."

"I would like to have storage monitoring. E.g., being able to monitor SANS, specifically protocols, like NFS and CIFS metrics."

"Documentation is one of the biggest things that I have a problem with since its documentation is not clear sometimes."

"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."

"We have had issues with our agents going offline."

"The solution must provide better support for Azure Web Apps service."

More New Relic cons

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The monthly cost os $1000 per server per month, but it could be even more. We pay about $250 for the server, and then New Relic wants over $1000 to give us statistics on those servers."

"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that."

"The new licensing model is great, as we pay for what we use (in computational units). However, the pricing is expensive compared to other tools."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy. The product is easy to deploy and manage, which is why our company purchased through the AWS Marketplace."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive. You have to pay a lot for each user. There is an additional cost for extra features."

"We deploy everything on AWS. Purchasing the product on AWS Marketplace made it easier for us."

"I recommend using the free version of New Relic. If you like the free version and understand its importance for your company, you can move to the trial. Then, you can migrate to the paid version."

"The price of New Relic APM could be less expensive. We are using the New Relic APM pro account and it is more costly. When compared to competitors the solution's pricing should be much more realistic."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

54%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

59%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about New Relic Insights?

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

Email alert customization is limited; it cannot be tailored much, which makes the system more rigid than optimal. The handling of logs from integration tools is not as advanced compared to other to...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Pingdom?

One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Pingdom?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds Pingdom?

SolarWinds Pingdom and Cloudflare are third-party applications that we utilize through a browser without any additional setup. We simply rely on their services, which is why I lack familiarity with...

See all answers

Comparisons

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana vs New Relic

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 49% of the time

Grafana vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 36% of the time

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 16% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

January 2025

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

December 2024

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

No data available

Learn More

New Relic

SolarWinds

Overview

New Relic is a powerful tool for optimizing web pages, tracking user behavior, and monitoring application performance. It helps detect anomalies, generate metrics, and create dashboards for synthetics monitoring, container workloads, stress tests, and more.

New Relic provides organizations with comprehensive insights into APIs, infrastructure, and scalability. It supports mobile and web applications with features like java tracking, health maps, customizable dashboards, and drill-downs. Users benefit from its easy initial setup, accurate alerts, UI monitoring, error tracking, and traceability. New Relic supports multiple ecosystems with straightforward pricing and new feature introductions, offering end-to-end monitoring, thorough data analysis, and effective problem resolution.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Java Tracking: Efficiently monitor Java applications.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Comprehensive overview of infrastructure health.
APM: In-depth application performance monitoring.
Tight Integration: Seamless integration across different system layers.
Health Maps: Visual representation of system health.
Customizable Dashboards: Personalized data display and insights.
Drill-Downs: Detailed analysis at multiple levels.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Application Insights: Detailed understanding of application performance.
Accurate Alerts: Immediate notifications for issues.
Traceability: Enhanced end-to-end traceability for problem resolution.
Scalability: Accommodation of growing infrastructure.
Flexible Query Design: Adaptable search and analysis functionality.
Reliable Performance: Consistent application monitoring and upkeep.

New Relic is leveraged in industries such as e-commerce, finance, and technology. It helps monitor web traffic, evaluate load balancing, and ensure applications meet performance standards. Companies use it for stress tests, container-based workloads, API monitoring, and infrastructure management. Its integration capabilities are valuable for maintaining performance and scalability across diverse ecosystems, aiding in thorough data analysis and problem resolution.

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

January 2025

Free Report: New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.