NTT-AT WinActor vs WorkFusion comparison

Read 32 WorkFusion reviews

3,002 Views
1,801 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

WorkFusion and NTT-AT WinActor compete in the automation software market. WorkFusion has an edge for larger enterprises needing scalable solutions, while NTT-AT WinActor is better suited for smaller organizations due to its simplicity.

Features: WorkFusion offers scalable automation, AI-driven capabilities, and integrates machine learning for digital transformation. NTT-AT WinActor provides a user-friendly design, quick automation setup, and requires minimal technical expertise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkFusion supports a flexible deployment model adaptable to various business environments with comprehensive support for seamless system integration. NTT-AT WinActor allows efficient deployment with strong customer service assisting in setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: WorkFusion has a higher initial cost, justified by extensive features and significant ROI for large operations. NTT-AT WinActor is more cost-effective for tight budgets, providing reasonable ROI through simpler automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion Report (Updated: March 2026).

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkFusion

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (28th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkFusion is 1.5%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
WorkFusion	1.5%
NTT-AT WinActor	0.8%
Other	97.7%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Arjun N

Associate II at Affirm

Enhance task automation through efficient processing of email and document workflows

WorkFusion works well with Microsoft 365, especially Outlook, allowing for efficient processing of multiple emails at once. Code automation is robust, enabling processing of multiple emails in a single transaction. It also supports reusable code components through Java, making it efficient for developers. WorkFusion has clear documentation that facilitates training.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

"NTT-AT WinActor has allowed our employees to focus on other things rather than the repetitive tasks that can now be given to the robot."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"I would definitely recommend WorkFusion because I think over the last six months it has matured and it is stable."

"It is useful that WorkFusion provides the entire infrastructure, which allows me to focus on writing code without worrying about maintenance."

"It's a pretty robust product."

"In terms of stability, it's quite good. It's an internal IP product."

"It takes care of simple tasks so users can focus more on exceptions than on regular use cases. They only focus on orders where they need to handle an exception, some information was not given, or there is an issue that they had to focus on. The rest of it goes straight through without human touch. We want to see our employees as engineers, wherein they think and solve problems, not necessarily have to do repetitive tasks. I think WorkFusion helps with avoiding repetitive tasks."

"The dashboard is the solution's most valuable feature; when clients want to look at the data it's very easy for them to do so, and the dashboard for the IT manager is very useful if there are issues and to create and follow processes."

"The dashboard is the solution's most valuable feature. When clients want to look at the data it's very easy for them to do so. The dashboard for the IT manager is very useful if there are issues and to create and follow processes."

"In terms of stability, it's quite good."

More WorkFusion pros

Cons

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"The solution is not user-friendly, this is something they should improve."

"Machine learning models for document-heavy processes have room for improvement because they require significant effort to train and update."

"The product needs to be "simple and easy" to use."

"The product could do more to expand its 'codeless' coding options by adding drag-and-drop assistance in building bots for non-technical users."

"For me, where it can be improved is the speed. I built two bots, one with WorkFusion and the same thing with Python; my feeling was that the speed at which Python did things, how fast it did them, was quite cool, it was faster."

"The problem with the solution is that it is agnostic, so it's not made for banks. Sometimes we are challenged because of this. We have to make everything from scratch to make it work for our clients."

"The user experience could be better both from an RPA perspective and from a business perspective."

"In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity. The system can break down, requiring numerous exception cases, thus complicating workflow creation."

More WorkFusion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

"As a first-time customer who wants to engage with WorkFusion, not working for my company, then I would want to do a PoC. The cost is prohibitive because they will ask me to get infrastructure with six or seven servers. Then, you must buy a WorkFusion license to do a PoC, which is expensive. I would then have to set up a team to build the PoC and see the benefits. That is very prohibitive."

"The pricing is fair because WorkFusion's out-of-the-box solution is appealing."

"My client is using RPA Express, which is available for them to use free of charge."

"I can't speak to pricing. It's a contract signed by upper management."

"The solution was not the cheapest, but it was also not the most expensive. Workfusion was very open to negotiating pricing and to working within the objectives of our firm."

"We have a good deal from WorkFusion. We have an unlimited global licensing deal with WorkFusion. For us, it is a no-worry solution. We can go ahead and use it as much as possible anywhere we need it. If WorkFusion has a different kind of a deal for licensing with others, then their business decisions need to be evaluated based on that."

"The overall cost could come down a bit in terms of maintaining the servers. Because it can handle complicated things in big use cases, the infrastructure is also correspondingly big. It would be nice to bring that cost down."

"We are on an annual contract to use the solution."

More WorkFusion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

29%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WorkFusion?

WorkFusion is cheaper than Kofax, but I cannot compare it to UiPath ( /products/uipath-reviews ) without exact pricing. It is worth the money as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WorkFusion?

In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity. The system can break down, requiring numerous exception cases, thus complic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WorkFusion?

I used WorkFusion ( /products/workfusion-reviews ) mainly for automating tasks related to Microsoft 365, such as automating cases from emails sent to Outlook. This included processing documents usi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 14% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 13% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 10% of the time

Nividous RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 7% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

UiPath Platform vs WorkFusion

Compared 17% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs WorkFusion

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs WorkFusion

Compared 5% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs WorkFusion

Compared 5% of the time

Blue Prism vs WorkFusion

Compared 4% of the time

More WorkFusion Competitors

Product Reports

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Download WorkFusion product report

Also Known As

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

No data available

Overview

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

WorkFusion, Inc. is the creator of AI-enabled Digital Workers designed specifically for banking and financial services organizations. Its Digital Workers are true knowledge workers that effectively augment existing teams in functions like anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, customer onboarding, Know Your Customer (KYC), and customer service. WorkFusion’s digital workforce solutions help solve talent shortages, increase workforce capacity, save money, enhance employee and customer satisfaction, and ensure ongoing compliance. For more information visit workfusion.com.

Sample Customers

Exeo Tech Corporation

Deutsche Bank, Amerant Bank, Bank of Asia, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, LPL Financial, Carter Bank & Trust, Selective Insurance, HPE, Canadian Tire, Standard Bank, Humana, New York-Presbyterian, Houston Methodist, Six Financial, State Street

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion