NTT-AT WinActor vs WorkFusion comparison

NTT DATA and WorkFusion are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. NTT DATA is ranked #39, while WorkFusion is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.3. NTT DATA holds a 0.8% mindshare in RPA, compared to WorkFusion’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of NTT DATA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of WorkFusion users who would recommend it.

NTT-AT WinActor

Read 2 NTT-AT WinActor reviews

621 Views
590 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

WorkFusion

Read 32 WorkFusion reviews

3,002 Views
1,801 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

WorkFusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

WorkFusion and NTT-AT WinActor compete in the automation software market. WorkFusion has an edge for larger enterprises needing scalable solutions, while NTT-AT WinActor is better suited for smaller organizations due to its simplicity.

Features: WorkFusion offers scalable automation, AI-driven capabilities, and integrates machine learning for digital transformation. NTT-AT WinActor provides a user-friendly design, quick automation setup, and requires minimal technical expertise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkFusion supports a flexible deployment model adaptable to various business environments with comprehensive support for seamless system integration. NTT-AT WinActor allows efficient deployment with strong customer service assisting in setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: WorkFusion has a higher initial cost, justified by extensive features and significant ROI for large operations. NTT-AT WinActor is more cost-effective for tight budgets, providing reasonable ROI through simpler automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,824 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkFusion

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (28th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkFusion is 1.5%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
WorkFusion	1.5%
NTT-AT WinActor	0.8%
Other	97.7%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Arjun N

Associate II at Affirm

Enhance task automation through efficient processing of email and document workflows

WorkFusion works well with Microsoft 365, especially Outlook, allowing for efficient processing of multiple emails at once. Code automation is robust, enabling processing of multiple emails in a single transaction. It also supports reusable code components through Java, making it efficient for developers. WorkFusion has clear documentation that facilitates training.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The cognitive features of this solution are good."

"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to use."

"We have seen Workfusion improve on accuracy and compliance... With the Workfusion model, we reduce human error and the need for further QC. We switch more to a QA process where we're testing whether the model is effective."

"It takes care of simple tasks so users can focus more on exceptions than on regular use cases. They only focus on orders where they need to handle an exception, some information was not given, or there is an issue that they had to focus on. The rest of it goes straight through without human touch. We want to see our employees as engineers, wherein they think and solve problems, not necessarily have to do repetitive tasks. I think WorkFusion helps with avoiding repetitive tasks."

"We recommend different solutions based on our customers' needs, and WorkFusion is what we offer for those who need a premium solution."

"In our opinion this group are the leaders in providing RPA solutions."

"If you compare it to its competitors in the market, it is more Java-native."

"The Robotic Desktop Automation Express component allows us to do rapid development outside the normal, time-consuming processes."

More WorkFusion pros

Cons

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"A better graphical user interface that allows business users to perform automation would make this solution number one in the market."

"There could be better version control through their web platform. That is something that could be improved on. Integration from the IDE, e.g., from WorkFusion Studio directly into Control Tower, would be nice to have too."

"If we're talking from a developer perspective, the task of actually building automation is not ideal. That's not their strong side."

"Where it can be improved is the speed. I built two bots, one with WorkFusion and the same thing with Python. My feeling was that the speed at which Python did things, how fast it did them, was quite cool. It was faster."

"I would like it if they provided a more detailed roadmap in terms of where they are going with the product. As we are trying to make decisions about the things that we are going to do to try to augment our capabilities, we could know whether they are thinking about the same things or not."

"I frequently face issues with infrastructure and some WorkFusion-related problems, such as login issues."

"It is difficult for non-technical users to use WorkFusion. If we really want to build automation, we definitely need Java developers. Their RPA is not for non-technical people. If I look at competing products, like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Blue Prism, or even Power Automate, a non-technical person can build basic automations and deploy them. Since non-technical people can easily build basic automations, they can be deployed in no time. With WorkFusion, there isn't a similar feature that works well. One needs to write code from scratch to build automation. That is definitely a deterrent if we really want to do quick, dirty automation. I would not rate WorkFusion very high on their no-code, low-code paradigm. In this area, I would definitely expect them to improve."

"It should integrate with more ERP solutions like SAP. It doesn't currently have that ability."

More WorkFusion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

"Find it online."

"I can't speak to pricing. It's a contract signed by upper management."

"The solution was not the cheapest, but it was also not the most expensive. Workfusion was very open to negotiating pricing and to working within the objectives of our firm."

"In addition to the licensing fee, there is also an implementation cost for each use case and technical support costs."

"As a first-time customer who wants to engage with WorkFusion, not working for my company, then I would want to do a PoC. The cost is prohibitive because they will ask me to get infrastructure with six or seven servers. Then, you must buy a WorkFusion license to do a PoC, which is expensive. I would then have to set up a team to build the PoC and see the benefits. That is very prohibitive."

"My client is using RPA Express, which is available for them to use free of charge."

"It is not the most expensive solution, but it is also not the cheapest."

"The overall cost could come down a bit in terms of maintaining the servers. Because it can handle complicated things in big use cases, the infrastructure is also correspondingly big. It would be nice to bring that cost down."

More WorkFusion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WorkFusion?

WorkFusion is cheaper than Kofax, but I cannot compare it to UiPath ( /products/uipath-reviews ) without exact pricing. It is worth the money as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WorkFusion?

In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity. The system can break down, requiring numerous exception cases, thus complic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WorkFusion?

I used WorkFusion ( /products/workfusion-reviews ) mainly for automating tasks related to Microsoft 365, such as automating cases from emails sent to Outlook. This included processing documents usi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 14% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 12% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 11% of the time

Nividous RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 8% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

UiPath Platform vs WorkFusion

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs WorkFusion

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs WorkFusion

Compared 6% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs WorkFusion

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs WorkFusion

Compared 5% of the time

More WorkFusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

March 2026

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Buyer's Guide

WorkFusion

February 2026

Download WorkFusion product report

Also Known As

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

No data available

Overview

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

WorkFusion, Inc. is the creator of AI-enabled Digital Workers designed specifically for banking and financial services organizations. Its Digital Workers are true knowledge workers that effectively augment existing teams in functions like anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, customer onboarding, Know Your Customer (KYC), and customer service. WorkFusion’s digital workforce solutions help solve talent shortages, increase workforce capacity, save money, enhance employee and customer satisfaction, and ensure ongoing compliance. For more information visit workfusion.com.

WorkFusion

Sample Customers

Exeo Tech Corporation

Deutsche Bank, Amerant Bank, Bank of Asia, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, LPL Financial, Carter Bank & Trust, Selective Insurance, HPE, Canadian Tire, Standard Bank, Humana, New York-Presbyterian, Houston Methodist, Six Financial, State Street

Buyer's Guide

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion

February 2026

Free Report: NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion

Find out what your peers are saying about NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.