NTT-AT WinActor vs WorkFusion comparison

Read 32 WorkFusion reviews

3,483 Views
2,090 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

WorkFusion and NTT-AT WinActor compete in the automation software market. WorkFusion has an edge for larger enterprises needing scalable solutions, while NTT-AT WinActor is better suited for smaller organizations due to its simplicity.

Features: WorkFusion offers scalable automation, AI-driven capabilities, and integrates machine learning for digital transformation. NTT-AT WinActor provides a user-friendly design, quick automation setup, and requires minimal technical expertise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkFusion supports a flexible deployment model adaptable to various business environments with comprehensive support for seamless system integration. NTT-AT WinActor allows efficient deployment with strong customer service assisting in setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: WorkFusion has a higher initial cost, justified by extensive features and significant ROI for large operations. NTT-AT WinActor is more cost-effective for tight budgets, providing reasonable ROI through simpler automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion Report (Updated: April 2026).

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion

Download the complete report

Helped 890,088 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkFusion

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (25th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkFusion is 1.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
WorkFusion	1.6%
NTT-AT WinActor	0.9%
Other	97.5%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Arijit-Ghosh

Intelligent Automation SME at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud platform orchestrates business processes with AI capabilities

I find the capabilities that a normal orchestrator should have to be valuable in WorkFusion. The WorkFusion 10 cloud-based platform is different from the earlier on-prem version, WorkFusion 9. The platform now includes auto machine learning and AI capabilities. We haven't used these extensively, but they are a nice feature they are working on. The platform remains stable with well-designed processes, despite being a complex and technical tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"NTT-AT WinActor has allowed our employees to focus on other things rather than the repetitive tasks that can now be given to the robot."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

"In terms of stability, it's quite good. It's an internal IP product."

"For automating mundane activities, I can recommend WorkFusion."

"The tool itself is easy. I started using it without really having any coding experience... After just a few clicks, it was doing reconciliations for me."

"Recently, our recons team was audited, and when the auditing was done, the process done by the reconciliation bot was the only process that was passed by the auditor."

"The cognitive features of this solution are good."

"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to use."

"It is useful that WorkFusion provides the entire infrastructure, which allows me to focus on writing code without worrying about maintenance."

"We recommend different solutions based on our customers' needs, and WorkFusion is what we offer for those who need a premium solution."

More WorkFusion pros

Cons

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"One of the issues that we are facing here in China, is that we cannot access the material for training because it is on YouTube."

"However, we've had use cases where we decided not to employ WorkFusion because it lacked capabilities that were important for the business processes in our company."

"The problem with the solution is that it is agnostic, so it's not made for banks."

"I would like it if they provided a more detailed roadmap in terms of where they are going with the product. As we are trying to make decisions about the things that we are going to do to try to augment our capabilities, we could know whether they are thinking about the same things or not."

"This is an expensive solution. They have a very expensive license compared to any other automation tool."

"WorkFusion comes packed with certain libraries and .jars. At times, you understand that you're using a system in which a library or .jar is outdated and you need to upgrade it... They need to better manage quickly making changes in WorkFusion to accommodate a situation where other technologies are not supporting the platform."

"We have executed our robots thousands of times in our enterprise environment. However, in an enterprise environment, WorkFusion has performance problems; it is slow in production."

"It is complex for enterprise implementation. The solution needs a needs minimum, of 20-22 servers. It's no small task. This is not a straightforward setup. It's a large undertaking and there are many moving parts."

More WorkFusion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

"The overall cost could come down a bit in terms of maintaining the servers. Because it can handle complicated things in big use cases, the infrastructure is also correspondingly big. It would be nice to bring that cost down."

"We have a good deal from WorkFusion. We have an unlimited global licensing deal with WorkFusion. For us, it is a no-worry solution. We can go ahead and use it as much as possible anywhere we need it. If WorkFusion has a different kind of a deal for licensing with others, then their business decisions need to be evaluated based on that."

"In addition to the licensing fee, there is also an implementation cost for each use case and technical support costs."

"The solution was not the cheapest, but it was also not the most expensive. Workfusion was very open to negotiating pricing and to working within the objectives of our firm."

"They have a very expensive license compared to any other automation tool. For instance, at $50,000 - $60,000, you can bring in an Automation Anywhere solution. For this solution, you need at least $250,000 to get something going."

"As a first-time customer who wants to engage with WorkFusion, not working for my company, then I would want to do a PoC. The cost is prohibitive because they will ask me to get infrastructure with six or seven servers. Then, you must buy a WorkFusion license to do a PoC, which is expensive. I would then have to set up a team to build the PoC and see the benefits. That is very prohibitive."

"One upgrade took a year to do, from the first server being built to the last bot being migrated. This was because we had to migrate all our existing bots. This is the same process and time frame that we are expecting towards the upcoming upgrade. I will end up spending half a million dollars to do an upgrade."

"We are on an annual contract to use the solution."

More WorkFusion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WorkFusion?

WorkFusion is cheaper than Kofax, but I cannot compare it to UiPath ( /products/uipath-reviews ) without exact pricing. It is worth the money as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WorkFusion?

In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity. The system can break down, requiring numerous exception cases, thus complic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WorkFusion?

I used WorkFusion ( /products/workfusion-reviews ) mainly for automating tasks related to Microsoft 365, such as automating cases from emails sent to Outlook. This included processing documents usi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 13% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 13% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 9% of the time

Syntel SyntBots vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 7% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

UiPath Platform vs WorkFusion

Compared 15% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs WorkFusion

Compared 9% of the time

Blue Prism vs WorkFusion

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs WorkFusion

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs WorkFusion

Compared 4% of the time

More WorkFusion Competitors

Product Reports

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Download WorkFusion product report

Also Known As

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

No data available

Overview

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

WorkFusion specializes in automating tasks such as invoice processing and order entry, leveraging advanced technologies like OCR and ML, making it ideal for industries requiring efficiency and decreased manual labor.

WorkFusion offers comprehensive robotic process automation, known for its reliable document processing engine utilizing machine learning and OCR technologies. While enhancing workflow management capabilities through Control Tower, it interfaces well with systems lacking APIs, making it flexible for various implementations. The solution is customizable and scalable to handle complex tasks efficiently. Despite its technical nature, user-friendly dashboards and workspaces ensure accessibility for non-technical stakeholders with minimal training. However, areas needing improvement include dynamic feature integration and better ERP solution compatibility, addressing the calls for simplified infrastructure setups.

What are the key features of WorkFusion?

Robust Automation Process: Effectively automates tasks like invoice processing through RPA.
Document Processing: High automation rates using OCR and machine learning.
Control Tower: Enhances workflow management for optimized operations.
Integration Flexibility: Interfaces seamlessly with systems lacking APIs.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Minimal training required, accessible for all stakeholders.

What benefits or ROI should users expect in WorkFusion reviews?

Process Efficiency: Significant reduction in manual labor for tasks like order entry.
Scalability: Easily handles complex and evolving operational requirements.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by minimizing reliance on human resources.
Ease of Use: User-oriented interface requiring minimal training, improving deployment speed.

WorkFusion sees implementation across industries like banking, transportation, and finance, where businesses leverage its capabilities for compliance, credit, and operations automation. While often employed in cloud-based or on-premises models, some organizations prefer hybrid installations to balance control with flexibility. Using machine learning, it optimizes processes like document reading and reduces reliance on human capital, enabling companies to focus on strategic initiatives and economic growth.

Sample Customers

Exeo Tech Corporation

Deutsche Bank, Amerant Bank, Bank of Asia, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, LPL Financial, Carter Bank & Trust, Selective Insurance, HPE, Canadian Tire, Standard Bank, Humana, New York-Presbyterian, Houston Methodist, Six Financial, State Street

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion