NTT-AT WinActor vs WorkFusion comparison

Read 32 WorkFusion reviews

2,927 Views
1,756 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

WorkFusion and NTT-AT WinActor compete in the automation software market. WorkFusion has an edge for larger enterprises needing scalable solutions, while NTT-AT WinActor is better suited for smaller organizations due to its simplicity.

Features: WorkFusion offers scalable automation, AI-driven capabilities, and integrates machine learning for digital transformation. NTT-AT WinActor provides a user-friendly design, quick automation setup, and requires minimal technical expertise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkFusion supports a flexible deployment model adaptable to various business environments with comprehensive support for seamless system integration. NTT-AT WinActor allows efficient deployment with strong customer service assisting in setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: WorkFusion has a higher initial cost, justified by extensive features and significant ROI for large operations. NTT-AT WinActor is more cost-effective for tight budgets, providing reasonable ROI through simpler automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion Report (Updated: February 2026).

NTT-AT WinActor vs. WorkFusion

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

28th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkFusion

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (28th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkFusion is 1.5%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WorkFusion	1.5%
NTT-AT WinActor	0.7%
Other	97.8%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Arijit-Ghosh

Intelligent Automation SME at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud platform orchestrates business processes with AI capabilities

I find the capabilities that a normal orchestrator should have to be valuable in WorkFusion. The WorkFusion 10 cloud-based platform is different from the earlier on-prem version, WorkFusion 9. The platform now includes auto machine learning and AI capabilities. We haven't used these extensively, but they are a nice feature they are working on. The platform remains stable with well-designed processes, despite being a complex and technical tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

"It takes care of simple tasks so users can focus more on exceptions than on regular use cases. They only focus on orders where they need to handle an exception, some information was not given, or there is an issue that they had to focus on. The rest of it goes straight through without human touch. We want to see our employees as engineers, wherein they think and solve problems, not necessarily have to do repetitive tasks. I think WorkFusion helps with avoiding repetitive tasks."

"The Control Tower enables us to create and use workflows. It helps us run processes. There are a lot of small features, but the Control Tower is a very good feature, wherein we can create bots and schedule them as well as create different instances of them to run in different regions."

"Their robots have increased the rate of efficiency by two to five times in our organization. There is still a human element to code out the package running the robots. You can't just click something and have it run. However, once that has been done, you can parallelize it 10 or 100 times in a fairly straightforward manner."

"The customer support is very responsive."

"The most valuable features are the recorder because it's user-friendly and the integration with other tools Excel."

"We have seen Workfusion improve on accuracy and compliance... With the Workfusion model, we reduce human error and the need for further QC. We switch more to a QA process where we're testing whether the model is effective."

"We need to analyze documents in order to understand them. We don't need to dedicate much time to this because WorkFusion's machine learning capabilities are very good. We can easily extract information and classify these documents. The document processing engine is very important to our organization because it is the center for many use cases, as we need to control the information contained in documents."

"The most valuable features are the Excel activities. It has a number of Excel activities that are quite reliable."

More WorkFusion pros

Cons

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"We have had some problems in the past with the Inspector tool that looks at the elements on the screen. Replacing it or improving it is needed."

"The most common issue we have is with the OCR, but that also depends on the quality of the documents your scanning. Still, I would say the OCR is comparable to other solutions. I wouldn't say it's better or worse than other OCR engines."

"We have executed our robots thousands of times in our enterprise environment. However, in an enterprise environment, WorkFusion has performance problems. It is slow in production."

"It is difficult for non-technical users to use WorkFusion. If we really want to build automation, we definitely need Java developers. Their RPA is not for non-technical people. If I look at competing products, like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Blue Prism, or even Power Automate, a non-technical person can build basic automations and deploy them. Since non-technical people can easily build basic automations, they can be deployed in no time. With WorkFusion, there isn't a similar feature that works well. One needs to write code from scratch to build automation. That is definitely a deterrent if we really want to do quick, dirty automation. I would not rate WorkFusion very high on their no-code, low-code paradigm. In this area, I would definitely expect them to improve."

"I would like it if they provided a more detailed roadmap in terms of where they are going with the product. As we are trying to make decisions about the things that we are going to do to try to augment our capabilities, we could know whether they are thinking about the same things or not."

"Where it can be improved is the speed. I built two bots, one with WorkFusion and the same thing with Python. My feeling was that the speed at which Python did things, how fast it did them, was quite cool. It was faster."

"We had some issues in the past, but it is fairly stable now. From what I hear, it is more stable in the later versions. With version 10.1.4, there were some issues relating to load distribution. However, it is good now."

"I would also like for it to be NLP-based."

More WorkFusion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

"One upgrade took a year to do, from the first server being built to the last bot being migrated. This was because we had to migrate all our existing bots. This is the same process and time frame that we are expecting towards the upcoming upgrade. I will end up spending half a million dollars to do an upgrade."

"We have a good deal from WorkFusion. We have an unlimited global licensing deal with WorkFusion. For us, it is a no-worry solution. We can go ahead and use it as much as possible anywhere we need it. If WorkFusion has a different kind of a deal for licensing with others, then their business decisions need to be evaluated based on that."

"The overall cost could come down a bit in terms of maintaining the servers. Because it can handle complicated things in big use cases, the infrastructure is also correspondingly big. It would be nice to bring that cost down."

"The pricing is fair because WorkFusion's out-of-the-box solution is appealing."

"They have a very expensive license compared to any other automation tool. For instance, at $50,000 - $60,000, you can bring in an Automation Anywhere solution. For this solution, you need at least $250,000 to get something going."

"As a first-time customer who wants to engage with WorkFusion, not working for my company, then I would want to do a PoC. The cost is prohibitive because they will ask me to get infrastructure with six or seven servers. Then, you must buy a WorkFusion license to do a PoC, which is expensive. I would then have to set up a team to build the PoC and see the benefits. That is very prohibitive."

"We are on an annual contract to use the solution."

"Find it online."

More WorkFusion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NTT-AT WinActor?

The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.

What needs improvement with NTT-AT WinActor?

The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.

What advice do you have for others considering NTT-AT WinActor?

For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternatively, we can use another method where we set up the task or schedule on the manag...

What do you like most about WorkFusion?

If you compare it to its competitors in the market, it is more Java-native.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WorkFusion?

WorkFusion is cheaper than Kofax, but I cannot compare it to UiPath ( /products/uipath-reviews ) without exact pricing. It is worth the money as a tool.

What needs improvement with WorkFusion?

In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity. The system can break down, requiring numerous exception cases, thus complic...

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 13% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 11% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 9% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

UiPath Platform vs WorkFusion

Compared 18% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs WorkFusion

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs WorkFusion

Compared 9% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs WorkFusion

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism vs WorkFusion

Compared 4% of the time

More WorkFusion Competitors

Product Reports

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

January 2026

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Download WorkFusion product report

January 2026

Also Known As

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

No data available

Overview

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

WorkFusion, Inc. is the creator of AI-enabled Digital Workers designed specifically for banking and financial services organizations. Its Digital Workers are true knowledge workers that effectively augment existing teams in functions like anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, customer onboarding, Know Your Customer (KYC), and customer service. WorkFusion’s digital workforce solutions help solve talent shortages, increase workforce capacity, save money, enhance employee and customer satisfaction, and ensure ongoing compliance. For more information visit workfusion.com.

Sample Customers

Exeo Tech Corporation

Deutsche Bank, Amerant Bank, Bank of Asia, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, LPL Financial, Carter Bank & Trust, Selective Insurance, HPE, Canadian Tire, Standard Bank, Humana, New York-Presbyterian, Houston Methodist, Six Financial, State Street