Okta vs Veza comparison

Okta and Veza are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Okta is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Veza is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0. Okta holds a 3.1% mindshare in PAM, compared to Veza’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veza users who would recommend it.

Okta Platform

Read 94 Okta Platform reviews

10,099 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Veza

Read 1 Veza review

2,483 Views
472 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Okta Platform

Veza

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Okta Platform and Veza compete in identity and access management. Okta Platform has the upper hand in integration and security, while Veza leads in access governance and feature richness, justifying higher costs.

Features: Okta Platform is known for identity integration, robust authentication, and seamless integration. Veza excels with advanced access governance, compliance tools, and comprehensive access management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Okta Platform offers quick deployment and strong technical support. Veza provides a tailored deployment experience with excellent support, requiring more initial time.

Pricing and ROI: Okta Platform has competitive pricing with strong ROI across enterprises. Veza's higher cost reflects its specialized features and governance capabilities, with potential ROI justifying the investment for businesses prioritizing advanced access management.

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,260 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Okta Platform

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (5th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (2nd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (1st), AI IT Support (2nd)

Veza

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (26th), Identity Management (IM) (19th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (11th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (7th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Okta Platform is 3.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Okta Platform	3.1%
Veza	1.3%
Other	95.6%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer9216065

Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Centralized identity has streamlined zero trust access and automated user lifecycles

Okta Platform does what it promises that it does. It is certainly all cloud-based as a SaaS solution. For enterprises which really prefer to have their own identity within their own perimeter, Okta Platform might not be the solution they might look for. Of course, there are ways you can get your dedicated tenant, especially for governments and federal agencies and all of those things. I have not tried those use cases. I think Okta Platform is the best of the class and appears consistently at the top of the Gartner report and other research. Based on the use cases I had, I was fairly happy with it. The PAM capabilities and attribute-based access controls, ABAC, represent a new paradigm. How practical that is for enterprises to deploy largely depends upon the use cases. There is always room for improvement, and it is not just for Okta Platform but typically for every single customer identity provider. There are a lot of other things the biometric and FIDO and all of those which can certainly be improved. However, that is more of a technological constraint rather than the vendor itself.

Read full review

Brooke Lynne Bowman

Senior Compliance Manager at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees

Streamlined compliance process with custom control framework and AI-driven security questionnaire management

Vanta has made the security questionnaire process much easier, thanks to AI. It automatically extracts answers and populates them within the SIG. The custom control framework allows me to incorporate our HITRUST controls and additional ISO twenty-seven thousand and one and financial controls. Moreover, it includes a knowledge bank for questionnaires and RFPs, making information updates more streamlined.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most beneficial features of the solution is the user provisioning and the de-provisioning feature."

"The main benefits Okta Customer Identity provides to users include single point of login for all applications and single authentication, which saves time and reduces frustration."

"You can only log in if you have the access, which protects the applications by avoiding cross-site scripting."

"The solution so far has been very stable."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The most valuable feature is the identity access authentication."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."

More Okta Platform pros

"It's the only current GRC vendor with licensing rights for HITRUST 11.3 framework, and I've avoided expensive HITRUST licensing costs through a custom control framework."

Cons

"This solution would be improved by adding biometrics features."

"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."

"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."

"The product is expensive compared to other tools."

"The only issue with Okta Customer Identity is after the upgrade process; we have some issues with the integration between Okta Customer Identity and Jamf."

"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."

"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."

"Okta could improve by making their learning materials more user-friendly."

More Okta Platform cons

"The support experience could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing needs to be reasonable. You are dealing with a lot of components and the pricing is component-based."

"Workforce Identity is well-priced."

"Price-wise, Okta Workforce Identity is a cheap solution. The overall cost depends on the license since you can negotiate with Okta or any of Okta's partners only if you opt for many licenses."

"We pay 23 pence (approximately $0.30 USD) per user, annually, for 150,000 users."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The price of Okta Workforce Identity is reasonable."

"The price of Okta Workforce Identity is competitively priced. We pay annually for the use of the solution."

"The solution is really expensive."

More Okta Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	44

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?

Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?

The overall price point of Vanta is commendable, especially considering the custom control framework that allows me to evade the high costs associated with HITRUST licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veza?

The support experience could be better. We often need to escalate our issues to the account executive to receive a response, especially when support is needed for integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veza?

We are currently in the implementation stages of Vanta. It's been challenging to build out as it is not as intuitive as OneTrust, especially in terms of scoping and needs.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Okta Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Okta Platform Competitors

Lumos vs Veza

Compared 21% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Veza

Compared 10% of the time

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs Veza

Compared 7% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Veza

Compared 6% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Veza

Compared 4% of the time

More Veza Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Okta Platform

January 2026

Download Okta Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

January 2026

Download Veza product report

Also Known As

Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity

No data available

Overview

Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.

Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.

What are Okta's key features?

Active Directory Sync: Simplifies app management by synchronizing user directories.
Single Sign-On: Provides desktop SSO for easier access to multiple apps.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust security options for different scenarios.
Universal Directory: Supports flexible identity management and configuration.
Integration Capability: Enables connections with both in-house and SaaS applications.

What benefits do organizations find in Okta?

Enhanced Security: Multi-layered authentication to prevent unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines user provisioning and app assignments.
Increased Compliance: Ensures secure access management aligning with IT policies.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connections with various applications enhancing operational workflows.

Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.

Okta

Veza Core Authorization Platform enhances data access visibility, centralizes control, and simplifies user permissions management. Its robust security through zero-trust principles, seamless integration, and automated compliance reporting boost organizational efficiency, productivity, and security, while streamlining workflows and minimizing vulnerabilities.

Veza

Sample Customers

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.