Okta vs Veza comparison

Okta and Veza are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Okta is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Veza is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0. Okta holds a 3.1% mindshare in PAM, compared to Veza’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veza users who would recommend it.

Okta Platform

Read 94 Okta Platform reviews

10,099 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Veza

Read 1 Veza review

2,483 Views
472 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Okta Platform

Veza

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Okta Platform and Veza compete in identity and access management. Okta Platform has the upper hand in integration and security, while Veza leads in access governance and feature richness, justifying higher costs.

Features: Okta Platform is known for identity integration, robust authentication, and seamless integration. Veza excels with advanced access governance, compliance tools, and comprehensive access management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Okta Platform offers quick deployment and strong technical support. Veza provides a tailored deployment experience with excellent support, requiring more initial time.

Pricing and ROI: Okta Platform has competitive pricing with strong ROI across enterprises. Veza's higher cost reflects its specialized features and governance capabilities, with potential ROI justifying the investment for businesses prioritizing advanced access management.

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,160 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Okta Platform

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (5th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (2nd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (1st), AI IT Support (2nd)

Veza

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (26th), Identity Management (IM) (19th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (11th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (7th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Okta Platform is 3.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Okta Platform	3.1%
Veza	1.3%
Other	95.6%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer9216065

Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Centralized identity has streamlined zero trust access and automated user lifecycles

Okta Platform does what it promises that it does. It is certainly all cloud-based as a SaaS solution. For enterprises which really prefer to have their own identity within their own perimeter, Okta Platform might not be the solution they might look for. Of course, there are ways you can get your dedicated tenant, especially for governments and federal agencies and all of those things. I have not tried those use cases. I think Okta Platform is the best of the class and appears consistently at the top of the Gartner report and other research. Based on the use cases I had, I was fairly happy with it. The PAM capabilities and attribute-based access controls, ABAC, represent a new paradigm. How practical that is for enterprises to deploy largely depends upon the use cases. There is always room for improvement, and it is not just for Okta Platform but typically for every single customer identity provider. There are a lot of other things the biometric and FIDO and all of those which can certainly be improved. However, that is more of a technological constraint rather than the vendor itself.

Read full review

Brooke Lynne Bowman

Senior Compliance Manager at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees

Streamlined compliance process with custom control framework and AI-driven security questionnaire management

Vanta has made the security questionnaire process much easier, thanks to AI. It automatically extracts answers and populates them within the SIG. The custom control framework allows me to incorporate our HITRUST controls and additional ISO twenty-seven thousand and one and financial controls. Moreover, it includes a knowledge bank for questionnaires and RFPs, making information updates more streamlined.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."

"The tool helps improve our security and productivity."

"The product is easy to use."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"You can only log in if you have the access, which protects the applications by avoiding cross-site scripting."

"The MFA part is the best. MFA provided most of the security that we were looking at with respect to the second level of authentication. Okta Workforce Identity provides a number of options with respect to multifactor authentication, such as the app, phone call, and text. These options provide different ways of logging in for users, and they were a lot more than what we needed. This is certainly a very good feature of Okta Workforce Identity."

"The most useful features of Okta for my organization are identity and access management, single sign-on, and the flexibility for hybrid setups."

"It is very seamless."

More Okta Platform pros

"It's the only current GRC vendor with licensing rights for HITRUST 11.3 framework, and I've avoided expensive HITRUST licensing costs through a custom control framework."

Cons

"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."

"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."

"If the organization is big, I can say Okta Platform is affordable; however, for small-scale industries, I would not recommend it, but for medium and enterprise organizations, it is good."

"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."

"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."

"Okta Customer Identity analytics and reporting tools do not help much to improve customer engagement strategies."

"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."

"The stability could be better."

More Okta Platform cons

"The support experience could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is per user per month and includes full technical support."

"The price of the solution is good."

"I believe it competes well. The pricing is pretty competitive. I know that Microsoft also provides something similar with its MFA and identity services."

"Okta's pricing is right where it needs to be and right in the middle of the market."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"It could be a bit too pricey for small companies. Okta Workforce Identity can add a lot of benefits, but smaller companies may not have a lot of applications that need to be managed by Okta Workforce Identity. In larger organizations, there are more departments, applications, and users to manage. Okta Workforce Identity adds a bit more value to those bigger organizations. In addition to standard licensing fees, there are also additional costs for things"

"The price of the solution is fair for what it offers."

"The licensing model is fine for general service usage. However, the charges for API features and API tokens can be quite high."

More Okta Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	44

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?

Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?

The overall price point of Vanta is commendable, especially considering the custom control framework that allows me to evade the high costs associated with HITRUST licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veza?

The support experience could be better. We often need to escalate our issues to the account executive to receive a response, especially when support is needed for integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veza?

We are currently in the implementation stages of Vanta. It's been challenging to build out as it is not as intuitive as OneTrust, especially in terms of scoping and needs.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Okta Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Okta Platform Competitors

Lumos vs Veza

Compared 21% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Veza

Compared 10% of the time

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs Veza

Compared 7% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Veza

Compared 6% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Veza

Compared 4% of the time

More Veza Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Okta Platform

January 2026

Download Okta Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

January 2026

Download Veza product report

Also Known As

Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity

No data available

Overview

Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.

Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.

What are Okta's key features?

Active Directory Sync: Simplifies app management by synchronizing user directories.
Single Sign-On: Provides desktop SSO for easier access to multiple apps.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust security options for different scenarios.
Universal Directory: Supports flexible identity management and configuration.
Integration Capability: Enables connections with both in-house and SaaS applications.

What benefits do organizations find in Okta?

Enhanced Security: Multi-layered authentication to prevent unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines user provisioning and app assignments.
Increased Compliance: Ensures secure access management aligning with IT policies.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connections with various applications enhancing operational workflows.

Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.

Okta

Veza Core Authorization Platform enhances data access visibility, centralizes control, and simplifies user permissions management. Its robust security through zero-trust principles, seamless integration, and automated compliance reporting boost organizational efficiency, productivity, and security, while streamlining workflows and minimizing vulnerabilities.

Veza

Sample Customers

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.