Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Polarion ALM comparison

OpenText and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Siemens is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 5.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to Siemens’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Siemens users who would recommend it.
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Read 205 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews
  • 7,225 Views
  • 2,979 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Polarion ALM
Read 20 Polarion ALM reviews
  • 4,608 Views
  • 3,098 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText ALM/Quality Center and Polarion ALM operate in the application lifecycle management market. Each product delivers unique advantages, though both excel in traceability and integration abilities. OpenText ALM/Quality Center seems slightly favored in scalability and data integrity, appealing to larger organizations.

Features: OpenText ALM/Quality Center offers robust traceability, high customization capabilities, and seamless integration with various automation tools. It maintains high data integrity and is highly scalable, making it ideal for large enterprises. Polarion ALM stands out for its all-in-one platform that manages requirements, coding, testing, and release processes with strong tool integrations. It is well-suited for highly regulated environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM/Quality Center faces criticism for high licensing costs, complex setup, limited browser support, and a lack of agile methodology support. Users desire a more user-friendly interface and enhanced reporting features. Polarion ALM could improve by refining its user interface and enhancing integration with external tools. Additional plugin costs are noted as a drawback for expanding functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both OpenText ALM/Quality Center and Polarion ALM are available as on-premises and cloud deployments. OpenText ALM/Quality Center users report varied customer service experiences, some favoring third-party support due to inconsistency depending on location and support tier. Polarion ALM is praised for responsive customer service, though advanced support incurs extra costs.

Pricing and ROI: Pricing for OpenText ALM/Quality Center is considered high, limiting its appeal for smaller enterprises. However, its strong ROI for large projects stems from process streamlining and efficiency improvements. Polarion ALM, while considered expensive, is valued in enterprises needing robust compliance and traceability. Additional plugin expenses are noted for function expansion.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Polarion ALM
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
OpenText ALM / Quality Center optimizes testing, enhances collaboration, reduces costs, and improves project efficiency and application traceability.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText ALM customer service is inconsistent, with mixed reviews on response times, expertise, and overall service quality.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText ALM/Quality Center scales well, with stable performance for large user bases, but licensing may affect scalability costs.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText ALM/Quality Center is stable and reliable, with minor issues often linked to network or hardware constraints.
No sentiment score available
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Polarion ALM report
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText ALM faces challenges with expensive licenses, outdated UI, limited integration, and performance issues, hindering usability and efficiency.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Polarion ALM report
 

Setup Cost

OpenText ALM is costly, requiring careful evaluation and negotiation, but global license sharing and SaaS could reduce expenses.
Polarion ALM's high pricing suits larger enterprises, justified by its functionality, with varying costs based on configuration and needs.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Polarion ALM report
 

Valuable Features

OpenText ALM/Quality Center provides comprehensive traceability, integration, scalability, and secure management for lifecycle, test cases, and defects.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Polarion ALM report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (1st)
Polarion ALM
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 7.3%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage
The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.
Read full review
Dina Bindi - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility
It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
63%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult. Issues with mapping multiple functional test cases to one automated test case nee...
See all answers
What do you like most about Polarion ALM?
It is a very stable solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?
I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system. This could greatly enhance requirement checking, improve form, content, and clarity, an...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?
We use Polarion ALM for software development, including requirements management, testing, change requests, and task tracking. We set up the environment by configuring items and reports based on use...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 24% of the time
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 22% of the time
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 14% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 10% of the time
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors
Jira vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jira vs Polarion ALM
Compared 29% of the time
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM Logo
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM
Compared 23% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM
Compared 18% of the time
PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM Logo
PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM
Compared 7% of the time
More Polarion ALM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
December 2024
OpenText ALM / Quality Center reportDownload OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Polarion ALM
December 2024
Polarion ALM reportDownload Polarion ALM product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
No data available
 

Learn More

OpenText
Siemens
 

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Polarion ALM
December 2024
Free Report: OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Polarion ALM
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Polarion ALM report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.