OpenText ALM/Quality Center and SpecFlow are two distinct tools for managing application lifecycle and quality assurance. Users seem more satisfied with the robust suite of features and integration capabilities of OpenText ALM/Quality Center, but the easier setup and flexible use of SpecFlow make it a strong contender in certain scenarios.
Features: Users value the comprehensive test management, defect tracking, and reporting capabilities of OpenText ALM/Quality Center. SpecFlow users appreciate its seamless integration with .NET, support for behavior-driven development (BDD), and tight integration with development workflows, which gives it an edge in developer-focused environments.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that OpenText ALM/Quality Center could benefit from enhancements to its flexibility, speed, and complexity. SpecFlow could improve its documentation, support for newer testing frameworks, and overall user experience. OpenText's complexity is a frequently noted issue.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM/Quality Center deployment can be intricate and time-consuming, with some users needing extensive support. Its customer service is well-regarded. SpecFlow offers quicker and simpler deployment but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support. SpecFlow’s easier initial setup may appeal to those preferring faster deployment cycles.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM/Quality Center typically involves higher upfront costs, with many users feeling the ROI justifies the investment over time. SpecFlow tends to have lower initial costs and offers good value, though some users question its long-term scalability compared to OpenText. SpecFlow is seen as cost-effective for simpler needs, while OpenText is preferred for large-scale, enterprise-level deployment.
SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.