OpenText UFT One and OpenText Business Process Testing are strong competitors in the software testing domain. While UFT One is favored for its extensive automated testing capabilities across multiple technologies, Business Process Testing has an edge in handling complex enterprise environments and process integration.
Features: UFT One provides automated testing for a wide range of applications including web, mobile, and API, with advanced integration features. It offers comprehensive support for various testing scenarios, including GUI and API testing, and includes built-in frameworks like BPT and LeanFT. Business Process Testing focuses on end-to-end business process management, scripting, and execution, catering specifically to enterprises with complex processes and integration needs. It allows for better modular testing by incorporating business components and offers ease of test content reusability.
Room for Improvement: UFT One could enhance its features by integrating more intuitive AI-driven test creation tools and simplifying the setup process for non-technical users. Improved support for cross-platform operations would also be beneficial. Meanwhile, Business Process Testing can improve by streamlining initial setup, enhancing user interface design for better usability, and expanding pre-built components for quicker testing implementation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UFT One provides flexible deployment options with strong customer support, making it adaptable to various business needs. Its deployment is more straightforward for technical testing applications. Business Process Testing, however, emphasizes seamless integration into existing business systems, requiring more detailed configuration and planning, yet also offers robust customer support services for enterprise systems.
Pricing and ROI: UFT One generally entails higher upfront costs due to its extensive feature set, which can deliver significant ROI for companies engaged in comprehensive technical testing. In contrast, Business Process Testing typically has lower initial costs but offers value through its focus on efficient business process testing, potentially resulting in substantial efficiency gains and ROI in enterprise settings.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
