OpenText Silk Central vs TestRail comparison

OpenText and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. OpenText is ranked #21, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 12.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Central

Read 9 OpenText Silk Central reviews

245 Views
156 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 21 TestRail reviews

2,491 Views
1,139 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Central

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText Silk Central and TestRail are prominent software testing management tools. Users tend to prefer TestRail based on its overall features and value for price, although OpenText Silk Central excels in some areas.

Features: OpenText Silk Central offers comprehensive test management capabilities, integration with other OpenText products, and strong reporting features. TestRail provides user-friendly navigation, extensive customization options, and powerful reporting tools.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Central needs better integration with third-party tools, improved performance speed, and a more intuitive user interface. TestRail could enhance its email notifications, offer more detailed analytics, and improve mobile accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central's deployment process is smooth but requires more configuration time. Customer service is reliable but slow. TestRail features quick and easy deployment with minimal setup time. Customer service is highly responsive and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central has higher initial setup costs but offers good ROI over time. TestRail provides a more affordable setup cost and quicker return on investment due to its lower pricing and efficient functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Central vs. TestRail Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Central vs. TestRail

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Central

Ranking in Test Management Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Design Automation (4th)

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 12.8%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

it_user685080

Test Governance at Poste Italiane

A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions

We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."

"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."

"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."

"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."

"I use the solution for test management."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."

"Better prediction of text."

"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."

"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."

"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."

"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"The product is not much expensive."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail should improve its pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Silk Central Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 21% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 17% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail

Compared 8% of the time

QMetry Test Management vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

December 2024

Download OpenText Silk Central product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

November 2024

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central

TestRail by Gurock

Learn More

OpenText

IDERA

Overview

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

Sample Customers

AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Central vs. TestRail

December 2024

Free Report: OpenText Silk Central vs. TestRail

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Central vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Central vs. TestRail report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.