Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs pCloudy comparison

OpenText and pCloudy are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while pCloudy is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 24.5% mindshare in MTT, compared to pCloudy’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of pCloudy users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 3,717 Views
  • 2,358 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
pCloudy
Read 2 pCloudy reviews
  • 290 Views
  • 83 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

OpenText UFT One and pCloudy compete in testing automation. Despite pCloudy offering more comprehensive features, OpenText UFT One stands out for ease of deployment and customer service. In terms of pricing and ROI, pCloudy is a cost-effective solution with strong user satisfaction and significant ROI.

Features: OpenText UFT One offers functional testing, API testing, and integration with various tools. pCloudy provides a cloud-based platform allowing extensive mobile application testing, real device access, and specialized mobile testing capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One is known for its straightforward deployment process and dependable customer support. pCloudy, with its cloud-based infrastructure, has more complex deployment but offers robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One usually involves higher setup costs, aligning with its performance. pCloudy features a competitive pricing model with lower initial costs and includes real device access providing better return on investment over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. pCloudy
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)
pCloudy
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 24.5%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of pCloudy is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
Rabindra Kumar Maharana - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good on the UI level and reasonably priced
We are customers of pCloudy.  We only use cloud devices and pCloudy is cheaper compared to Amazon and other tools. The product is also very good on the UI level where they can see the logs. They can discover any problem at the app level, so that the development team can fix that. The connectivity…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers."
"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."
"Automation of tests is done very fast with UFT One."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."
"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."
"It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications."
"The solution's recording option is the most beneficial for test script creation and maintenance."
"On a scale of one to ten, I would give OpenText UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis."
More OpenText UFT One pros
"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."
"The product is very good on the UI level."
 

Cons

"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."
"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."
"We'd like it to have less scripting."
"The tool needs to improve its performance since it can become heavy."
"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."
"The solution does not have proper scripting."
"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."
"The UA objects are sometimes hard to recognize, so the coverage should be increased. Open-source alternatives have a broad scope. Also, it's sometimes difficult to make connections between two of the components in the UFT mobile center. It should be easier to set up the wireless solution because we have to set both. We directly integrate Selenium and APM, so we should try to cover all the features they have in APM and Selenium with the UFT mobile."
More OpenText UFT One cons
"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."
"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."
"The pricing of the product is an issue."
"The price is one aspect that could be improved."
"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."
"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."
"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."
"The tool's price is high."
More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...
See all answers
What do you like most about pCloudy?
The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with pCloudy?
The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for pCloudy?
My company's ground crew and cabin crew use an application. The solution helps the application to be compatible with other devices.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
March 2025
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
Mobile App Testing Tools
March 2025
pCloudy reportDownload pCloudy product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro
No data available
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

pCloudy is the next-gen mobile app testing platform powered by emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics. You can perform manual as well as automation testing on more than 5000 device-browser combination hosted on cloud. It provides hosts of other services like bot testing, in-field user experience testing.

pCloudy
 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. pCloudy
March 2025
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. pCloudy
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. pCloudy report.
See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.