Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs Qt Squish comparison

OpenText and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 10.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 7,434 Views
  • 4,702 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Qt Squish
Read 20 Qt Squish reviews
  • 2,493 Views
  • 1,298 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Qt Squish are competitive tools in the automated testing landscape. OpenText UFT One has the upper hand in enterprises requiring broad application support and extensive integration capabilities, whereas Qt Squish is preferred for its cross-platform support and effective GUI application testing.

Features: OpenText UFT One integrates easily with diverse systems, offers comprehensive regression testing, and provides strong support for multiple technologies. Qt Squish supports automated test creation with popular scripting languages, excels in identifying complex GUI elements, and provides robust cross-platform functionality.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One can enhance performance in complex deployments, reduce the complexity of its initial setup, and improve resource usage efficiency. Qt Squish may advance object recognition for non-Qt applications, streamline its scripting interface, and enhance integration with complementary testing tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One's deployment is complex due to its rich feature set, yet it provides solid documentation and support. Qt Squish, while simpler to deploy, focuses on offering rapid customer service responses with technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One involves higher setup costs but delivers significant ROI for larger organizations utilizing its expansive features. Qt Squish has a lower cost of entry, making it appealing for smaller projects, particularly those focused on GUI applications, promising a compelling ROI without extensive infrastructure dependencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Qt Squish
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText UFT One enhances efficiency and productivity with automation, AI capabilities, and supports achieving up to 300% ROI.
Sentiment score
7.3
Qt Squish reduced manual testing time, enabled agile cycles, improved efficiency, and optimized processes with stable automation suites.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewerLuc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText UFT One's customer service is generally efficient but inconsistent, with varied experiences in support quality and response time.
Sentiment score
6.9
Qt Squish's customer service is efficient and knowledgeable, with quick responses, but video support can be expensive.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText UFT One is scalable, integrating with Jenkins, but success depends on licensing, automation quality, and deployment strategy.
Sentiment score
7.2
Qt Squish is praised for scalability, especially with floating licenses, but some face minor issues like image recognition glitches.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText UFT One generally exhibits stability, though some users report performance issues, often resolved through updates. Satisfaction remains high.
Sentiment score
8.0
Users report high stability with Qt Squish, experiencing minimal issues, which are quickly resolved by support and updates.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One requires improvements in stability, compatibility, speed, memory use, object recognition, and integration with open-source tools.
Qt Squish needs improvements in object identification, testing stability, integration, and enhanced support for non-Qt applications while addressing pricing and speed issues.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One licensing is costly, leading organizations to mix different license types and evaluate ROI against open-source alternatives.
Qt Squish receives mixed reviews for its pricing, with high costs and inflexible licensing compared to other tools.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewerLuc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One provides versatile automation with cross-platform compatibility, easy use, robust testing, and integration with key technologies.
Qt Squish is a versatile UI testing tool praised for cross-platform support, Python compatibility, and seamless CI integration.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewerLuc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)
Qt Squish
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.0%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
17%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
See all answers
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish
Compared 22% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish
Compared 18% of the time
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish Logo
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish
Compared 12% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish
Compared 11% of the time
Selenium HQ vs Qt Squish Logo
Selenium HQ vs Qt Squish
Compared 4% of the time
More Qt Squish Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
March 2025
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish
March 2025
Qt Squish reportDownload Qt Squish product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro
froglogic Squish
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group
 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Qt Squish
February 2025
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Qt Squish
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. Qt Squish report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.