Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs Trellix Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
32nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (24th)
Trellix Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security is 3.5%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Juan Ramón López Ruiz - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2024
Recognizes and mitigates a wide array of spam and phishing attempts
This is one of the best solutions for servers for advanced users. Advanced users, such as those working with banks and who have to make payments, are exposed to more attacks. The people whose job is to write, create invoices, register products, or do quotes. They don't need the EPR. They can use a…
AhmedEl-Tayeb - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2022
Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services
Some of our products have a first and second line owned by us. We are giving support services to the customers instead of the vendor. Some other products are supported directly by the technology vendor, however. Technical support from the vendor is very bad. Usually, when the customer submits a ticket, they put a severity level on the case. Whenever the case is very important, and there is a real malfunction in the product on the customer side, and there is something down that needs someone to have a look immediately, it takes more time than it should to even engage with the customer. When someone has to contact the customer and have a remote session within the customer environment, they sometimes lack in terms of communication with the customer. The support centers are located in the East and not all have an acceptable level of English in order to communicate directly with the customer.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It prevents our users from circumventing security. Everything is password protected so they can't get into it. They can't uninstall it. They can't do anything."
"It is easy to manage."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"It is stable, and the performance is good."
"The most valuable feature of Panda Security Adaptive Defense is we don't have to have dedicated infrastructure on-premise because it is cloud-based."
"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."
"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."
"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."
"The most valuable feature is the centralized console where everything can be controlled by the administration."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."
"The most valuable features of the solution include DLP (data loss prevention), CASB (cloud access security broker) functionality, endpoint encryption, and cloud workload security."
 

Cons

"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."
"Their MacOS support isn't that good."
"They could have more reports."
"The implementation was difficult."
"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."
"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."
"Occasionally, we suffer from little bugs that give us the wrong message."
"I would like to see better data protection."
"The security of this solution needs improvement."
"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."
"The software download features could stand improvement."
"We know that McAfee isn't the best antivirus and it can't protect us 100%, although we are okay with the level of protection that it gives us."
"We experienced some bad behavior when we first installed the product. The system also starts slowly in some instances. If for some reason this solution crashes, we could lose all our data."
"There are certain shortcomings in the features concerning DLP in Trellix, where certain additions must be made in the future."
"The platform needs improvement in terms of handling heavy databases."
"The local technical support could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."
"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."
"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."
"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."
"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."
"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."
"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."
"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."
"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."
"Trellix Endpoint Security is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution."
"This product is costly."
"The pricing is more or less the same as the other tools in the market."
"I am happy with the pricing."
"Pricing is fair."
"It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together."
"It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Government
6%
Hospitality Company
6%
Educational Organization
40%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.
What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
The software can improve the number of messages we are receiving in case of an attack.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very ...
 

Also Known As

Panda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. Trellix Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.